Research Article

Perceptions of digital competence in learning and teaching English in the context of online education

Gulnara M. Kassymova 1 , Saule B. Tulepova 1 * , Madina B. Bekturova 2
More Detail
1 Department of Language Teacher Education, Faculty of Education and Humanities, Suleyman Demirel University, Kaskelen, KAZAKHSTAN2 Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Kazakh Ablai Khan University of International Relations and World Languages, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), January 2023, ep396, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12598
Published Online: 02 November 2022, Published: 01 January 2023
OPEN ACCESS   2819 Views   2381 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Digital competence has become a crucial capability in the learning process, in the working place, and in personal communication. The aim of the article is to explore master students’ perceptions of their digital competence by identifying frequency, expertise, and satisfaction in using information communication technologies (ICT) in their learning process when studying at university and teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) in the context of online education. The sample comprised 49 master students who participated in distant evening classes at a private university in Kazakhstan while working simultaneously as teachers of English in various educational institutions during the day. Master students’ perceptions of digital competence is one of the approaches to reveal the gaps in students’ digital competence development necessary for learning and teaching EFL online. The main research tool for data collection was the online survey allowing the master students to measure their level of digital competence. Evident from the results, the majority of respondents are digitally competent; yet there is a cohort of master students who scored low on ICT skills needed for teaching and admitted the necessity of improvement. Also, according to the findings, the respondents’ frequency, expertise, and satisfaction level by their digital competence needed in the learning is higher than that in teaching. This can also imply that even though the frequency and expertise in using digital technologies for learning contributes to the development of the expertise in using them for conducting their own classes, master students need special training on the use of ICT for pedagogical purposes.

CITATION (APA)

Kassymova, G. M., Tulepova, S. B., & Bekturova, M. B. (2023). Perceptions of digital competence in learning and teaching English in the context of online education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), ep396. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12598

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  2. Barr, D. (2016). Students and ICT: An analysis of student reaction to the use of computer technology in language learning. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 36(2), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.17161/iallt.v36i2.8408
  3. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.
  4. Casarotti, M., Filipponi, L., Pieti, L., & Sartori, R. (2002). Educational interaction in distance learning. Analysis of a one-way video and two-way audio system. PsychNology Journal, 1(1), 28-38. http://www.psychnology.org/File/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_1_1_CASAROTTI.pdf
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
  6. Cuhadar, C. (2018). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ levels of readiness to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6211
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  8. Dias-Trindade, S., Moreira J. A., & Ferreira A. (2020). Assessment of university teachers on their digital competences. Qwerty, 15(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000025
  9. Erstad, O. (2005). Digital kompetanse i skolen: en innføring [Digital literacy in schools: An introduction]. Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
  10. Evans, R. (2009). Foreign language learning with digital technology: A review of policy and research evidence. McMillan.
  11. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83167/lb-na-26035-enn.pdf
  12. From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence–between values, knowledge, and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43-50. http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43
  13. Gamito, R., Aristizabal, P., & Vizcarra, M. (2018). Pre-school education degree students’ prior knowledge and perception of digital competence. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (pp. 1421-1428). https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd18.2018.8218
  14. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
  15. Guillen-Gamez, F. D., Lugones A., & Mayorga-Fernandez, M. J. (2019). ICT use by pre-service foreign languages teachers according to gender, age and motivation. Cogent Education, 6, 1574693. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574693
  16. Heerwegh, D., De Wit, K., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2016). Exploring the self-reported ICT skill levels of undergraduate science students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 19-47. https://doi.org/10.28945/2334
  17. Hsieh, C.-N. (2009). Review of brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 22-28. https://doi.org/10125/44178
  18. Jordaan, W., & Jordaan, J. (1996). Man in context. Lexicon.
  19. Krumsvik, R. J. (2008a). Situated learning and digital competence. Education and Information Technology, 4(13), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5
  20. Krumsvik, R. J. (2008b). The emerging digital literacy among teachers in Norway (the story of one digital literate teacher). In R. Kobayashi (Ed.), New educational technology. Nova Science.
  21. Krumsvik, R. J. (2009). Situated learning in the network society and digitized school. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2(32), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802457224
  22. Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre Utbildning [Higher Education], 1(1), 39-51.
  23. Krumsvik, R. J. (Ed.) (2007). Skulenog den digitalelæringsrevolusjon [The school and the digital learning revolution]. Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
  24. López Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigCom 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5583
  25. Meirovitz, T., Russak, S., & Zur, A. (2022). English as a foreign language teachers’ perceptions regarding their pedagogical-technological knowledge and its implementation in distance learning during COVID-19. Heliyon, 8, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09175
  26. O’Dowd, R. (2013). Telecollaborative networks in university higher education: Overcoming barriers to integration. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.02.001
  27. Ottestad, G., Kelentrić, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2014). Professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-02
  28. Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071
  29. Putilovskaya, T. S., & Kassymova, G. M. (2021). Psychological readiness of students for digitalization of educational process. In E. G. Popkova, V. N. Ostrovskaya, & A. V. Bogoviz (Eds), Socio-economic systems: Paradigms for the future. Studies in systems, decision, and control (pp. 1337-1345). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_139
  30. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital competence framework for educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  31. Romero-Tena, R., Llorente-Cejudo, C., Puig-Gutiérrez, M., & Barragán-Sánchez, R. (2021). The pandemic and changes in the self-perception of teacher digital competences of infant grade students: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094756
  32. Shibutani, T. (1986). Social processes. An introduction to sociology. University of California Press.
  33. Tomte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Karstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005
  34. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  35. Wang, E., Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2012). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business & Information Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y
  36. Zhao, Y., Sanchez Gomez, M. C., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Zhao, I. (2021). Digital competence in higher education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability, 13, 12184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112184