Research Article
Exploring the Relationship Between Professional Development Experience and Skills in Educational Technology Integration Among Primary EFL Teacher
More Detail
1 College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, TX, USA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), January 2022, ep328, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11365
Published: 26 November 2021
OPEN ACCESS 2739 Views 1289 Downloads
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in professional development (PD) opportunities afforded to English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers based on years of teaching experience related to foreign language teaching. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in seven primary schools with 60 primary EFL teachers in a middle-sized urban school district in China. Descriptive statistics and multiple Chi-square tests were used in the study. The results indicated that more experienced primary EFL teachers had the least technological pedagogical knowledge, which is contrary to the traditional concept that more experienced teachers have better teaching knowledge. The study suggests the need to support EFL teachers in China with technology-based PD training including teachers with varied years of teaching experience, in order to enhance their instructional skills.
CITATION (APA)
Zhou, X., Padron, Y., & Waxman, H. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Between Professional Development Experience and Skills in Educational Technology Integration Among Primary EFL Teacher. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep328. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11365
REFERENCES
- Akturk, A. O., & Saka Ozturk, H. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK levels and students’ self-efficacy as predictors of students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 283-294.
- Angelova, M., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness, and language skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.907320
- Ansyari, M. F. (2015). Designing and evaluating a professional development programme for basic technology integration in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1675
- Baracaldo Guzmán, D. (2019). Technology Integration for the Professional Development of English Teachers. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, (46), 157-168.
- Bostancıoğlu, A., & Handley, Z. (2018). Developing and validating a questionnaire for evaluating the EFL ‘Total PACKage’: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1422524
- Caromawati, C. (2017). Evaluating a synchronous online teacher development program on creating call teaching materials. Indonesian EFL Journal, 3(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v3i2.663
- Cheng, K. H. (2017). A survey of native language teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 692-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1349805
- Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
- Debbagh, M., & Jones, W. M. (2018). Examining English language teachers’ TPACK in oral communication skills teaching. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(1), 43-62.
- Education informatization 2.0. (2018). Notice of the Ministry of Education on printing and distributing the education informatization 2.0 action plan. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.
- Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
- Hoesein, E. M. (2015). Using mobile technology and online support to improve language teacher professionalism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.076
- Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287-1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024
- Jabbari, N., Boriack, A. W., Barohona, E., Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (2017). Social networking. InJ. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-7). TESOL International Association and Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0430
- Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
- Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
- Karimi, M. N. (2011). The effects of professional development initiatives on EFL teachers’ degree of self efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 4. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n6.6
- Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A Review of the Research (Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute). https://doi.org/10.54300/625.642
- Levak, N., & Son, J. B. (2017). Facilitating second language learners’ listening comprehension with Second Life and Skype. ReCALL, 29(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000215
- Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.016
- Liu, M. H., & Kleinsasser, R. (2015). Exploring EFL teachers’ knowledge and competencies: In-service program perspectives. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 119-138.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
- Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., Marandi, S. S., & Wang, S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1632010. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010
- Rienties, B., Lewis, T., O’Dowd, R., Rets, I., & Rogaten, J. (2020). The impact of virtual exchange on TPACK and foreign language competence: Reviewing a large-scale implementation across 23 virtual exchanges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1737546
- SGO (Steering Group Office for Survey of Language Situation in China). (2006). Zhongguo Yuyan Wenzi Shiyong Qingkuang Diaocha Ziliao: Findings and Documents of Survey of Language Situation in China. Language Press.
- Statista Research Department (2021, Mar 3). The most spoken languages worldwide 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-languages-worldwide
- Wei, R., & Su, J. (2012). The statistics of English in China. English Today, 28(3), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078412000235
- Wu, Y. T., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in teaching English as a foreign language: Representation of primary teachers of English in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0240-7
- Xu, X., & Sun, Y. (2019). A Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) Framework for ESP teachers in tertiary education in China. The Asian ESP Journal, 193.
- Yuksel, I., & Yasin, E. (2014). Cross-sectional evaluation of English language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(2), 23.