Research Article

A case study of implementing generative AI in university’s general English courses

Yong Jik Lee 1 , Robert O. Davis 2 *
More Detail
1 Gongju National University, Gongju City, SOUTH KOREA2 Chonnam National University, Gwangju City, SOUTH KOREA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), October 2024, ep533, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15218
Published Online: 28 September 2024, Published: 01 October 2024
OPEN ACCESS   974 Views   634 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research investigated the effects of generative AI on affective factors (motivation, interest, and confidence) of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners enrolled in Korean university-level general English courses. During the Spring 2024 semester, this study involved 89 participants exposed to a generative AI-based instruction model. Compared to traditional methodologies, these results highlight the potential effectiveness of generative AI-based English instruction for writing and speaking in supporting linguistic proficiency and positive affective attitudes toward language learning among EFL learners.

CITATION (APA)

Lee, Y. J., & Davis, R. O. (2024). A case study of implementing generative AI in university’s general English courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep533. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15218

REFERENCES

  1. Barros, A., Prasad, A., & Śliwa, M. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implication for research, teaching and service. Management Learning, 54(5), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231201445
  2. Chaka, C. (2023). Generative AI chatbots-ChatGPT versus YouChat versus Chatsonic: Use cases of selected areas of applied English language studies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.1
  3. Davis, R. O., & Lee, Y. J. (2023). Prompt: ChatGPT, create my course, please!. Education Sciences, 14(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010024
  4. Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), Article 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
  5. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_107-1
  6. Hwang, S. I., Lim, J. S., Lee, R. W., Matsui, Y., Iguchi, T., Hiraki, T., & Ahn, H. (2023). Is ChatGPT a “fire of Prometheus” for non-native English-speaking researchers in academic writing? Korean Journal of Radiology, 24(10), Article 952. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0773
  7. Jin, S. H. (2022). The effects of using AI speaking application for English speaking courses on Korean EFL learners’ speaking skills and their affective attitudes. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 25(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2022.25.2.232
  8. Kim, N. Y. (2017). Effects of different types of chatbots on EFL learners’ speaking competence and learner perception. Center for Cross Culture Studies, 28(9), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.21049/ccs.2017.48..223
  9. Kim, S. W., & Lee, S. (2020). An analysis of a primary school English speaking lesson using an AI-powered conversational English learning application: A focus on student engagement and learners’ and teachers’ perceptions of the class. The Korea Association of Primary English Education, 26(3), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2020.26.3.177
  10. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156
  11. Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
  12. Lee, H. (2020). A systematic review of artificial intelligence use in English learning: Focus on higher education. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 6(43), 2027–2042. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.6.143
  13. Lee, S. (2019). The effects of gamification-based artificial intelligence chatbot activities on elementary English learners’ speaking performance and affective domains. The Korea Association of Primary English Education, 5(3), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2019.25.3.75
  14. Liao, H., Xiao, H., & Hu, B. (2023). Revolutionizing ESL teaching with generative artificial intelligence—Take ChatGPT as an example. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 5(20), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.052008
  15. Pack, A., & Maloney, J. (2023). Potential affordances of generative AI in language education: Demonstrations and an evaluative framework. Teaching English with Technology, 23(2), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.56297/BUKA4060/VRRO1747
  16. Voss, E., Cushing, S. T., Ockey, G. J., & Yan, X. (2023). The use of assistive technologies including generative AI by test takers in language assessment: A debate of theory and practice. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(4–5), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2288256