Research Article

Using WhatsApp in Teaching Chemistry and Biology to Tenth Graders

Marwan Abualrob 1 * , Safa Nazzal 1
More Detail
1 Arab American University, Palestine* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), January 2020, 55-76, https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.641772
OPEN ACCESS   2598 Views   1576 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study is to assess the extent to which WhatsApp Instant Messaging is used to teach chemistry and biology to the tenth-grade students. A mixed approach was used, whereby the authors drew on the content analysis model to analyze quantitative data. The sample consisted of 28 Palestinian tenth-grade students and their teachers, who used WhatsApp Instant Messaging for four months (the Spring semester of 2019). The collected data was divided into four categories: the nature of the message (instructional, organizational, or social); the form of the message (texts, pictures/graphs, voice recordings, videos, or link-sharing); the direction of communication flow (from a teacher to a student, from a student to a teacher, from a student to a student, or from a teacher to a teacher); and knowledge exchange. Our findings suggest that WhatsApp is used more for non-instructional purposes– particularly socialization– yet the portion of instruction-related messages was somehow enough to predict more effective future use of the application for teaching/learning purposes.

CITATION (APA)

Abualrob, M., & Nazzal, S. (2020). Using WhatsApp in Teaching Chemistry and Biology to Tenth Graders. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.641772

REFERENCES

  1. Abualrob, M., & Daniel, E. (2011). The Delphi Technique in Identifying Learning Objectives for the Development of Science, Technology and Society Modules for Palestinian Ninth Grade Science Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2538-2558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.610381
  2. Asterhan, C. S., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher-student interactions on Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.003
  3. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  4. Constine, J. (2018, January 31). WhatsApp hits 1.5 billion monthly users. $19B? Not so bad. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/31/whatsapp-hits-1-5-billion-monthly-users-19b-not-so-bad/
  5. Fewkes, A. M., & McCabe, M. (2012). Facebook: Learning tool or distraction? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 92 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784686
  6. Friedman, L.W., & Friedman, H. H. (2013). Using social media technologies to enhance online learning. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2013.1.5
  7. iPoke. (2019, January 15). Social Palestine. Retrieved from http://social.ipoke.co/?fbclid=IwAR12SffWAd0Y1Wn5AaVLYPBA5_p4iwNIOoxSm_ARGXbbfsyXoYQ2i6NWohw
  8. Plana, M. G- C., Escofet, M. I. G., Figueras, I. T., Gimeno, A., Appel, C., & Hopkins, J. (2013, July). Improving learners’ reading skills through instant short messages: A sample study using WhatsApp. 4th World-CALL Conference, Glasgow. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255718202_Improving_learners’_reading_skills_through_instant_short_messages_a_sample_study_using_WhatsApp
  9. Rambe, P., & Crispen C. (2013, August 23). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively-generated resources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African university. International Conference on Advanced Information and Technology for Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266645202_Using_mobile_devices_to_leverage_student_access_to_collaboratively_generated_resources_A_case_of_WhatsApp_instant_messaging_at_a_South_African_University
  10. Robert, L. & Dennis, A. (2005). Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 48(1), 10-21. http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2004.843292
  11. Schwarz, B., & Caduri, G. (2016). Novelties in the use of social networks by leading teachers in their classes. Computers & Education, 102, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.002
  12. Siemens, G. (2004, December 10). Constructivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
  13. Smit, I. (2011, November 12). WhatsApp with BlackBerry; Can messengers (BBM) be MXit? Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a126/55aae1de674c2147b2f5844450dc9a661c2a.pdf
  14. Smith, E. E. (2016). A real double-edged sword: Undergraduate perceptions of social media in their learning. Computers & Education, 103, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.009
  15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.