Research Article

Technology based self-monitoring for a student with EBD to improve academic engagement

Lane Maxcy 1 * , Denise A. Soares 2 , Judith Harrison 3
More Detail
1 University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO, USA2 University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA3 Rutgers University, New Brunswick–Piscataway, USA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), April 2025, ep563, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15864
Published Online: 16 January 2025, Published: 01 April 2025
OPEN ACCESS   3868 Views   3068 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The current study evaluated the effect of technology-based self-management on disruptive behavior and academic engagement (AE) with a student with an emotional and behavioral disorder. A multiple baseline design across three general education settings was used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, self-management using the CellF-Monitoring app. The use of technology based self-management resulted in an increase in AE across all three academic settings. Furthermore, students and teachers rated CellF-Monitoring app as highly social valid
Keywords: emotional behavior disorders, self-management, academic engagement, disruptive behavior, intervention

CITATION (APA)

Maxcy, L., Soares, D. A., & Harrison, J. (2025). Technology based self-monitoring for a student with EBD to improve academic engagement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), ep563. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15864

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213–262). Rand McNally & Company.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), Article 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Bedesem, P. L., & Dieker, L. A. (2014). Self-monitoring with a twist: Using cell phones to CellF-Monitor on task behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713492857
  4. Bowman-Perrot, L., Davis, H. V., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring. A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087490
  5. Briere, D. E., Simonsen, B., Sugai, G., & Myers, D. (2015). Increasing new teachers’ specific praise using a within-school consultation intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713497098
  6. Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self- management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988-2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016159
  7. Bruhn, A. L., Woods-Groves, S., Fernando, J., Choi, T., & Troughton, L. (2017). Evaluating technology-based self-monitoring as a tier 2 intervention across middle school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0198742917691534
  8. Bruhn, A., & Watt, S. (2012). Improving behavior by using multicomponent self-monitoring within a targeted reading intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 38(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203800102
  9. Bruhn, A., Gilmour, A., Rila, A., Van Camp, A., Sheaffer, A., Hancock, E., Fernando, J., & Wehby, J. (2022). Treatment components and participant characteristics associated with outcomes in self-monitoring interventions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720946651
  10. Bruhn, A., McDaniel, S., & Kreigh, C. (2015). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.17988/BD-13-45.1
  11. Bunch-Crump, K. R., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). An investigation of multitiered behavioral interventions on disruptive behavior and academic engagement of elementary students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(4), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717696939
  12. Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher, A. K., Eveleigh, A., McCarthy, M., Funero, M., Ponnock, A., Chow, J. C., & Durlak, J. (2021). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions. Child Development, 94(5), 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Cook, S. C., Rao, K., & Collins, L. (2017). Self-monitoring interventions for students with EBD: Applying UDL to a research-based practice. Beyond Behavior, 26(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295617694407
  15. Cruz, R. A., Firestone, A. R., & Rodl, J. E. (2021). Disproportionality reduction in exclusionary school discipline: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321995255
  16. Denune, H., R., Hawkins, L., Donovan, L., Mccoy, D., Hall, L., & Moeder, A. (2015). Combining self-monitoring and an interdependent group contingency to improve the behavior of sixth graders with EBD. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21846
  17. Gage, N. A., Whitford, D. K., & Katsiyannis, A. (2018). A review of the evidence-base for school-wide positive behavior support with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0029
  18. Graham-Day, K., Gardner, R., & Hsin, Y. (2010). Increasing on-task behaviors of high school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is it enough? Education and Treatment of Children, 33(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1353/ etc.0.0096
  19. Gulchak, D. J. (2008). Using a mobile handheld computer to teach a student with an emotional and behavioral disorder to self-monitor attention. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0028
  20. Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B. D., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R., & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030201
  21. Harrison, J. R., Evans, S. W., Baran, A., Khondker, F., Press, K., Noel, D., Wasserman, S., Belmonte, C., & Mohlmann, M. (2020a). Comparison of accommodations and interventions for youth with ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Psychology, 80, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.05.001
  22. Harrison, J. R., Kwong, C., Evans, S. W., Peltier, C., Mathews, L., & Chatman, T. (2020b). Game-based self-management: Addressing inattention during independent reading and written response. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 36(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2019.1660748
  23. Harrison, J. R., Soares, D. A., Rudzinski, S., & Johnson, R. (2019). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders and classroom-based interventions: Evidence-based status, effectiveness, and moderators of effects in single-case design research. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 569–611. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319857038
  24. Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices, and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699703100102
  25. Kalis, T. M., Vannest, K. J., & Parker, R. (2007). Praise counts: Using self-monitoring to increase effective teaching practices. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 51(3), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.3.20-27
  26. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Politics, civil rights, and disproportional identification of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 17(4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903231903
  27. Kern, L., & Gresham, F. (2002). Research exploring alternatives for children in schools (REACH). Office of Special Education Programs, National Center Grant funded by the Department of Education.
  28. Kern, L., Kelly, S., Rosati, S. A., Shera, S., Fluharty, M., Gabrilowitz, R., Carter, D., Liang, C. T. H., & Freeman, J. (2023). Systematic review of college and career readiness interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221136132
  29. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
  30. Kumm, S., Talbott, E., & Jolivette, K. (2021). A technology-based self-monitoring intervention for secondary students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211004450
  31. Landrum, T. J., Tankersley, M., & Kauffman, J. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030401
  32. Ling, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Weber, D. (2011). Effects of a classwide interdependent group contingency designed to improve the behavior of an at-risk student. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9125-x
  33. Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 762–797. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.4.3686k7x734246430
  34. Lloyd, B. P., Bruhn, A. L., Sutherland, K. S., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Progress and priorities in research to improve outcomes for students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918808485
  35. Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self- regulation. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 39–65). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  36. Martella, R. C., Nelson, J. R., Morgan, R. L., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2013). Understanding and interpreting educational research. Guilford Press.
  37. Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., & Jitendra, A. K. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance and classroom behavior of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9(1), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054705278832
  38. McCurdy, E. E., & Cole, C. L. (2014). Use of a peer support intervention for promoting academic engagement of students with autism in general education settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1941-5
  39. Menzies, H. M., Lane, K. L., & Lee, J. M. (2009). Self-monitoring strategies for use in the classroom: A promising practice to support productive behavior for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 18(2), 27–35.
  40. Mihalas, S., Morse, W. C., Allsopp, D. H., & Alvarez McHatton, P. (2009). Cultivating caring relationships between teachers and secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Implications for research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 30(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315950
  41. Mooney, P., Ryan, J. B., Uhing, B. M., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2005). A review of self-management interventions targeting academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-6298-1
  42. NCES. (2015). Digest of education statistics (vol. 46). US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Education Division, National Center for Education Statistics.
  43. NCES. (2022). Students with disabilities. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
  44. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). National Center for Special Education Research.
  45. Offerman, E. C., Asselman, M. W., Bolling, F., Helmond, P., Stams, G. J. J., & Lindauer, R. J. (2022). Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences in students with emotional and behavioral disorders in special education schools from a multi-informant perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), Article 3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063411
  46. Ota, K. R., & DuPaul, G. J. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), Article 242. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881
  47. Otero, T. L., & Haut, J. M. (2016). Differential effects of reinforcement on the self-monitoring of on-task behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(1), Article 91. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000113
  48. Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
  49. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500201
  50. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011a). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511399147
  51. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011b). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
  52. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
  53. Peltier, C., Vannest, K. J., Morin, K. L., Sinclair, T. E., & Sallese, M. R. (2020). A systematic review of teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 28(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717
  54. Peterson, L. D., Young, K. R., Salzberg, C. L., West, R. P., & Hill, M. (2006). Using self- management procedures to improve classroom social skills in multiple general education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(1), 1–21.
  55. Reid, R., Trout, A. L., & Schartz, M. (2005). Self-regulation interventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 71(4), Article 361.
  56. Renaissance Learning. (2016). STAR reading: Technical manual. Wisconsin Rapids.
  57. Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without exceptionalities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007050070010201
  58. Rock, M. L., & Thead, B. K. (2009). Promote student success during independent seatwork. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208326055
  59. Schardt, A. A., Miller, F. G., & Bedesem, P. L. (2019). The effects of CellF-Monitoring on students’ academic engagement: A technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718773462
  60. Smith, C. R., Katsiyannis, A., & Ryan, J. B. (2011). Challenges of serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Legal and policy considerations. Behavioral Disorders, 36(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003600304
  61. Soares, D. A., Harrison, J. R., Vannest, K. J., & McClelland, S. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR45-4.379-399
  62. Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Parker, R. I. (2013). Single case research in schools: Practical guidelines for school-based professionals. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203081426
  63. Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2011). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis. https://singlecaseresearch.org/
  64. Vogelgesang, K. L., Bruhn, A. L., Coghill-Behrends, W. L., Kern, A. M., & Troughton, L. C. (2016). A single-subject study of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9253-4
  65. Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  66. Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259301400206
  67. Wills, H. P., & Mason, B. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
  68. Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest?. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.2307/329492