Research Article

Sparse, Pair-Wise, Emotion-Focused Interactions: Educators’ Networking Patterns on Twitter at Early Pandemic

Yiyun Fan 1 * , Kathlyn Elliott 1
More Detail
1 Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), July 2022, ep373, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12058
Published: 28 April 2022
OPEN ACCESS   1792 Views   976 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Educators have increasingly turned to social media for their instructional, social, and emotional needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to see where support and professional development would be needed and how the educational community interacted online, we sought to use existing Twitter data to examine potential educators’ networking and discourse patterns. Specifically, this mixed-methods study explores how educators used Twitter as a platform to seek and share resources and support during the transition to remote teaching around the start of massive school closures due to the pandemic. Based on a public COVID-19 Twitter chatter database, tweets from late March to early April 2020 were searched using educational keywords and analyzed using social network analysis and thematic analysis. Social network analysis findings indicate that the support networks for educators on Twitter were sparse and consisted of mainly small, exclusive communities. The networks featured one-on-one interactions during the early pandemic, highlighting that there were few large conversations that most educators were part of but rather many small ones. Thematic analysis findings further suggest that both informational and nurturant support were relatively equally present on Twitter among educators, particularly pedagogical content knowledge and gratitude. This study adds to an understanding of the educational networks as a means of professional and personal support. Additionally, findings present the discourse featured in educator networks at the onset of an educational emergency (i.e., COVID-19) as decentralized as well as desiring pedagogical content knowledge and emotional sharing.
Keywords: data science applications in education, emergency online learning, Twitter, teacher professional development, social network analysis

CITATION (APA)

Fan, Y., & Elliott, K. (2022). Sparse, Pair-Wise, Emotion-Focused Interactions: Educators’ Networking Patterns on Twitter at Early Pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), ep373. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12058

REFERENCES

  1. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
  2. Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0019
  3. Banda, J. M., Tekumalla, R., Wang, G., Yu, J., Liu, T., Ding, Y., & Chowell, G. (2020). A large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter dataset for open scientific research--an international collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03688. https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia2030024
  4. Bastian, M., Heymann S., & Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: An open-source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf
  5. Beigi, G., Hu, X., Maciejewski, R., & Liu, H. (2016). An overview of sentiment analysis in social media and its applications in disaster relief. In W. Pedrycz, & S. M. Chen (Eds.), Sentiment analysis and ontology engineering. Studies in computational intelligence (pp. 313-340). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30319-2_13
  6. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Mech, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Bruguera, C., Guitert, M., & Romeu, T. (2019). Social media and professional development: a systematic review. Research in Learning Technology, 27. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2286
  9. Burnett, G. (2000). Information exchange in virtual communities: A typology. Information Research, 5(4), 82.
  10. Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2014.925701
  11. Carpenter, J. P., Trust, T., Kimmons, R., & Krutka, D. G. (2021). Sharing and self-promoting: An analysis of educator tweeting at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education Open, 2, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100038
  12. Carpenter, J., Tani, T., Morrison, S., & Keane, J. (2020). Exploring the landscape of educator professional activity on Twitter: An analysis of 16 education-related Twitter hashtags. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752287
  13. Conrado, S. P., Neville, K., Woodworth, S., & O’Riordan, S. (2016). Managing social media uncertainty to support the decision-making process during emergencies. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(sup1), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187396
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
  15. Darabi, A., Sikorski, E., & Harvey, R. (2006). Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education, 27(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600654809
  16. De Laat, M., & Schreurs, B. (2013). Visualizing informal professional development networks: Building a case for learning analytics in the workplace. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1421-1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479364
  17. EducationWeek. (2020). Map: Coronavirus and school closures in 2019-2020. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/map-coronavirus-and-school-closures-in-2019-2020/2020/03
  18. Elliott, J. C. (2017). The evolution from traditional to online professional development: A review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(3), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1305304
  19. Forte, A., Humphreys, M., & Park, T. (2012). Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Dublin, Ireland.
  20. Francera, S. (2021). A scale to measure school leaders’ use of Twitter for professional development and learning. NASSP Bulletin, 105(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365211008990
  21. Gilani, E., Salimi, D., Jouyandeh, M., Tavasoli, K., & Wong, W. (2019). A trend study on the impact of social media in decision making. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.004
  22. Greenhalgh, S. P. (2021). Differences between teacher-focused twitter hashtags and implications for professional development. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1161
  23. Greenhalgh, S. P., & Koehler, M. (2017). 28 days later: Twitter hashtags as “just in time” teacher professional development. TechTrends, 61, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0142-4
  24. Greenhalgh, S. P., Rosenberg, J., Staudt Willet, K. B., Koehler, M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2020). Identifying multiple learning spaces within a single teacher-focused Twitter hashtag. Computers & Education, 148, 103809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103809
  25. Greenhalgh, S.P., Nnagboro, C., Kaufmann, R., & Gretter, S. (2021) Academic, social, and cultural learning in the French #bac2018 Twitter hashtag. Education Tech Research Development, 69, 1835-1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10015-6
  26. Greenhow, C., Campbell, D., Galvin, S., & Askari, E. (2018, March). Social media in teacher professional development: A literature review. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2256-2264). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  27. Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning. https://visible-learning.org/
  28. Haythornthwaite, C. A. (2009). Participatory transformations. University of Illinois Press.
  29. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 413-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.799475
  30. Hjálmsdóttir, A., & Bjarnadóttir, V. S. (2021). “I have turned into a foreman here at home”: Families and work–life balance in times of COVID‐19 in a gender equality paradise. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(1), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12552
  31. Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00282
  32. Hunter, L. J., & Hall, C. M. (2018). A survey of K-12 teachers’ utilization of social networks as a professional resource. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 633-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9627-9
  33. Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532
  34. Jacobs, G., & Rogers, C. (1997). Remote teaching with digital video: Trans-national experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 292-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00036
  35. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
  36. Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304
  37. Landherr, A., Freidl, B., & Heidemann, J. (2010). A critical review of centrality measures in social networks. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3
  38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Lee-Johnson, J., & Henderson, L. (2019). Using social media to re(center) black women’s voices in educational research. In R. Winkle-Wagner, J. Lee-Johnson, & A. N. Gasket (Eds.), Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education (pp.222-235). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158860-16
  40. Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
  41. Mancinelli, D. (2020, July). Using social media to build a personal learning network. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-social-media-build-personal-learning-network
  42. Marcelo, C., & Marcelo, P. (2020). Educational influencers on Twitter. Analysis of hashtags and relationship structure. Communicar, 29(68), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-06
  43. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  44. Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y. Y., Onnela, J. P., & Rosenquist, J. (2011, July). Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 554-557.
  45. Moore-Adams, B. L., Jones, W. M., & Cohen, J. (2016). Learning to teach online: A systematic review of the literature on K-12 teacher preparation for teaching online. Distance Education, 37(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1232158
  46. Nagle, J. (2018). Twitter, cyber-violence, and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.014
  47. Prestridge, S. (2019). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003
  48. Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Fahlevi, M., Mufid, A., Agistiawati, E., Cahyono, Y., & Suryani, P. (2020). Impact of work from home (WFH) on Indonesian teachers performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 6235-6244.
  49. Quintanilla, B. U. (2016). The implications of social media use: Secondary teachers’ use of social media for personal, professional, and instructional purposes [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas].
  50. Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x
  51. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2021). Locked down but not isolated: Twitter collaboration among teachers in response to COVID-19. In A. Plutino, & E. Polisca (Eds.), Languages at work, competent multilinguals and the pedagogical challenges of COVID-19 (pp.71-77). Research-publishing.net.https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.49.1220
  52. Rosenberg, J. M., Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., Hamilton, E. R., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). An investigation of state educational Twitter hashtags (SETHs) as affinity spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1-2), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672351
  53. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
  54. Schlager, M. S., Farooq, U., Fusco, J., Schank, P., & Dwyer, N. (2009). Analyzing online teacher networks: Cyber networks require cyber research tools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328487
  55. Schoen, H., Gayo-Avello, D., Metaxas, P. T., Mustafaraj, E., Strohmaier, M., & Gloor, P. (2013). The power of prediction with social media. Internet Research, 23(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2013-0115
  56. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth Publishing.
  57. Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: Tweet types and purposes in# Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1611507
  58. Supovitz, J. A., Kolouch, C., & Daly, A. J. (2020). The social psychology of homophily: The collective sentiments of education advocacy groups. Teachers College Record, 122(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200603
  59. Tang, H. (2021). Teaching teachers to use technology through massive open online course: Perspectives of interaction equivalency. Computers & Education, 174, 104307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104307
  60. Tashakkori, A., & Teddie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE.
  61. Teaching Tolerance. (2020). About teaching tolerance. https://www.tolerance.org/about
  62. Torphy, K. T., Brandon, D. L., Daly, A. J., Frank, K. A., Greenhow, C., Hua, S., & Rehm, M. (2020). Social media, education, and digital democratization. Teachers College Record, 122(6), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200601
  63. Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693
  64. Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
  65. UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  66. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
  67. Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Belikov, O. (2019). Academics’ social media use over time is associated with individual, relational, cultural and political factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1713-1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12788
  68. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  69. Wesely, P. M. (2013). Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113489032
  70. Zeeman, L., Poggenpoel, M., Myburgh, C. P. H., & Van der Linde, N. (2002). An introduction to a postmodern approach to educational research: Discourse analysis. Education, 123(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v7i1.300
  71. Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers’ online collaborative learning activities. Computers & Education, 104, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.011
  72. Zimmerle, J., & Lambert, C. (2019). Globally connected: using Twitter to support rural pre-service teachers. Theory and Practice in Rural Education, 9(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2019.v9n1p91-104