Research Article

Perspectives of Students on Acceptance of Tablets and Self-directed Learning with Technology

Sahin Gokcearslan 1 *
More Detail
1 Gazi University, Turkey* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), January 2017, 40-55, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6186
OPEN ACCESS   2482 Views   2781 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Recent mobile learning technologies offer the opportunity for students to take charge of the learning process both inside and outside the classroom. One of these tools is the tablet PC (hereafter ‘tablet’). In parallel with increased access to e-content, the role of tablets in learning has recently begun to be examined. This study aims to reveal the relationship between the level of acceptance of tablets (TAM) and the level of selfdirected learning with technology (SDLT) of students and to differentiate these in terms of gender. A mixed method research design is used in this study. In addition, the qualitative part of the study aims to determine the reasons students have for using or not using tablets for supporting learning. The study group consisted of 414 high school students, involved in the pilot application group of the FATIH project in Turkey. According to the study, a significant positive relationship was determined between four of the variables of tablet acceptance and the SDLT level. While the degree of acceptance of tablets was different according to gender, the SDLT level was not.

Keywords: tablet computers, self-directed learning, secondary education, learning with technology, gender studies

CITATION (APA)

Gokcearslan, S. (2017). Perspectives of Students on Acceptance of Tablets and Self-directed Learning with Technology. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6186

REFERENCES

  1. Akerlind, G. S. & Trevitt, A. C. (1999). Enhancing self‐directed learning through educational technology: When students resist the change. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36(2), 96-105.
  2. Alotaibi, K. N. (2015). The learning environment as a mediating variable between self-directed learning readiness and academic performance of a sample of Saudi nursing and medical emergency students. Nurse Education Today, 36, 249-254. doi:10.1080/1355800990360202
  3. Alyahya, S. & Gall, J. E. (2012, June). iPads in education: a qualitative study of students’ attitudes and experiences. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (Vol. 2012, No. 1, pp. 1266-1271). Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/40913.
  4. Asfar, N., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Secondary students' perceptions of information, communication and technology (ICT) use in promoting self directed learning in Malaysia. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(4), 67-82.
  5. Atkinson, P. (2008). A bitter pill to swallow: the rise and fall of the tablet computer. Design Issues, 24 (4), 3–25.
  6. Bebell, D. & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational Outcomes and Research from 1: 1 Computing Settings. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), n1.
  7. Bryan, V. C. (2015). Self-directed learning and technology. The Education Digest, 80(6), 42-44.
  8. Cakmakci, N. (2015). Fatih’e yeni yol haritası. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/fatih-e-yeni-yol-haritasi-30268278
  9. Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
  10. Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 162-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00124.x
  11. Courtois, C., Montrieux, H., De Grove, F., Raes, A., De Marez, L., & Schellens, T. (2014). Student acceptance of tablet devices in secondary education: A three-wave longitudinal crosslagged case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014. 03.017
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel, nicel ve karma yontem yaklasimlari/arastirma deseni (Cev. ed. S. B. Demir). Ankara: Egiten Kitap.
  13. Cuhadar, C. (2014). Information technologies pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Tablet PCs as an innovative learning tool. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 741-753. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.2038
  14. Davis F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
  16. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/imms. 1993.1022
  17. Demir, A. G. O. & Yurdugul, H. (2013). Self-directed learning with technology scale for young students: A validation study. E-international Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 58- 73. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ijer/article/ view/1073000316
  18. Demir, O., Yasar, S., Sert, G., & Yurdugul, H. (2014). Examination of the relationship between students' attitudes towards computer and self-directed learning with technology. Education & Science, 39(176), 257-266. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3621
  19. Dundar, H. & Akcayir, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40-46. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.020
  20. EBA (2016). eba.gov.tr sosyal eğitim platformu istatistikleri. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.eba.gov.tr
  21. El-Gayar, O. & Moran, M. (2007). Evaluating students' acceptance and use of tablet PCs in collegiate classrooms. AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, 91. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/004d/fc1fb031b1d9b63cf4e21e348dae9950dfad.pdf
  22. El-Gayar, O., Moran, M., & Hawkes, M. (2011). Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs and Implications for Educational Institutions. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 58-70.
  23. Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505-521. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013 .06.006
  24. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, ıntention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237022
  25. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
  26. Gerpott, T. J., Thomas, S., & Weichert, M. (2013). Personal characteristics and mobile Internet use intensity of consumers with computer-centric communication devices: An exploratory empirical study of iPad and laptop users in Germany. Telematics and Informatics, 30(2), 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2012.03.008
  27. Gong, Z., & Wallace, J. D. (2012). A comparative analysis of iPad and other M-learning technologies: exploring students’ view of adoption, potentials, and challenges. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 13(1), 2-29.
  28. Gungoren, O. C., Bektas, M., Ozturk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Acceptence of TPC scalevalidity and reliability study. Education and Science, 39(176), 69-79. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3497
  29. Holt, L. L. (2011). Self-direction and technology use among new workforce entrants (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1191.
  30. Horzum, M. B., Ozturk, E., Bektas, M., Gungoren, O. C., & Cakir, O. (2014). Secondary school students tablet computer acceptance and readiness: A structural equation modelling. Education & Science, 39(176), 81-93. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3500
  31. Hur, W. M., Kim, H., & Kim, W. M. (2014). The moderating roles of gender and age in tablet computer adoption. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 33-39. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0435
  32. Ifenthaler, D. & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525-534. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.004.
  33. Jung, H. J. (2014). Ubiquitous learning: Determinants impacting learners’ satisfaction and performance with smartphones. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 97-119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.004
  34. Kaya, G. & Kocak Usluel, Y. (2012). Ogrenme-ogretme sureclerinde BIT entegrasyonunu etkileyen faktorlere yonelik icerik analizi. Buca Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 31, 48-67.
  35. Keskin, N. O. & Kuzu, A. (2015). Development and testing of a m-learning system for the professional development of academics through design-based action research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 193-220.
  36. Kim, R., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computers & Education, 70, 150-160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
  37. Kim, S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information & Management, 45(6), 387-393. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
  38. Kinash, S., Brand, J. & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 4, 639–655.
  39. Kirk, J. M. (2012). Self-directed learning: A potential predictor for technology integration among K-12 teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1534
  40. Knowles, M. (1975). Self directed learning. Oxford, England: Gulf Publishing.
  41. Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2014). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (ahead-of-print), 1-21. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.889714
  42. Lee, K., Tsai, P. S., Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Students' perceptions of self‐directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 425-437. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12055
  43. Liaw, S. S. L. & Huang, H. M. (2011). Exploring learners’ acceptance toward mobile learning. T. Teo (Ed.), Technology acceptance in education: Research and issues (ss. 145-157). Boston: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4_8
  44. Liaw, S. S. & Huang, H. M. (2015). How factors of personal attitudes and learning environments affect gender difference toward mobile learning acceptance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 104-132.
  45. Loyens, S., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411- 427. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7.
  46. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self‐directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-14.
  47. MNE (2014). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/ssstablet.php
  48. Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79- 101. doi:10.2190/EC.42.1.d
  49. Nguyen, L., Barton, S. M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2015). Ipads in higher education—hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190-203. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12137
  50. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.150
  51. Robertson, J. (2011). The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1628-1644. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011. 03.003
  52. Sánchez, R. A. & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632-1640. doi:10.1016/ j.chb.2010.06.011
  53. Sha, L., Looi, K.C., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, H. L. (2012). Recognizing and measuring selfregulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 718-728. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.019
  54. Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C. D., & Ng, E. M. (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students' behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600-618.
  55. Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G., & Despotakis, T. (2009). Computer based testing using “digital ink”: Participatory design of a tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 811-819. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.006
  56. Smarkola, C. (2011). A mixed-methodological technology adoption study. In T. Teo (Ed.), Technology acceptance in education (pp. 9-41). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4_2
  57. Song, L. & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning,6(1), 27-42.
  58. Steinweg, S. B., Williams, S. C., & Stapleton, J. N. (2010). Faculty use of tablet PCs in teacher education and K-12 settings. TechTrends, 54(3), 54-61. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.019
  59. Su, Y., Feng, L., Hsu, C. H., & Yang, C. C. (2013). Technology as an activity system for selfdirected, expanding learning: An analysis based on activity theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2575-2582. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.296
  60. Tamim, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Bernard, R. M. (2015). Large-scale, governmentsupported educational tablet initiatives. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/809/COL%20Tablet%20Initiatives.pdf?seq uence=1&isAllowed=y
  61. Taminiau, E.M.C., Kester, L., Corbalan, G., Spector, J.M., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2015). Designing on-demand education for simultaneous development of domainspecific and self-directed learning skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 405- 421. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12076
  62. Teo, T., Tan, S. C., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1764–1771. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001
  63. Timothy, T., Chee, T. S., Beng, L. C., Sing, C. C., Ling, K. J. H., Li, C. W., & Mun, C. H. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1764-1771. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2010.08.001
  64. TUIK (2013). Secilmis gostergelerle Ankara. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ilGostergeleri/iller/ANKARA.pdf
  65. Turkkamu (2016). A complete ordered list of Turkey’s most successful high schools. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.turkkamu.net/turkiyenin-en-basarili-liseleri-tamsirali-liste/8807/
  66. Usluel, Y. K. & Mazman, S. G. (2010). Elements that take part in the process of propagation, acceptance and adoption of innovations in education: A content analysis. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 39, 60-74. Retrieved from http://egitim.cu.edu. tr/efdergi
  67. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. Retrieved on 1 December 2016 from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3250981
  68. Wakefield, J. & Smith, D. (2012). From Socrates to satellites: iPad learning in an undergraduate course. Creative Education, 3, 5, 643–648.
  69. Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
  70. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., Do, J., Skutnik, A. L., Thompson, D. J., Stephens, A. F., & Tays, C. A. (2015). Design lessons about participatory self-directed online learning in a graduatelevel instructional technology course. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2), 178-189. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2015.1071244
  71. Yucel, U. A. & Gulbahar, Y. (2013). Technology acceptance model: a review of the prior predictors. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(1), 89-109.
  72. Zhong, B. (2013). From smartphones to iPad: Power users’ disposition toward mobile media devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1742-1748. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.016