Research Article

Paper-first knowledge engineering as a pedagogical framework for cognitive agency in AI-assisted learning

Gary Wayne Collins 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Applied Languages, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), October 2026, ep700, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19638
Published: 19 October 2026
OPEN ACCESS   35 Views   21 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study investigates how a structured “paper-first” approach can support cognitive engagement during artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted academic work in higher education. Growing reliance on generative AI has increased concerns about surface-level learning, trial-and-error prompting, and reduced student ownership of academic writing. Using a two-year design-based research approach involving nine iterative cycles, the study developed and refined a framework that required students to construct manual logic diagrams before engaging with AI tools and expert system environments. Participants included a six-member interdisciplinary design team and 150 communication for academic purposes students from the faculty of information and communications technology at a South African university. Data were collected through iterative observations and focus group interviews and analyzed using grounded theory and constant comparative analysis. Findings indicate that the framework supported more structured reasoning, reduced inefficient prompting behaviors, and improved students’ ability to identify weaknesses in their own arguments before digital interaction. Students also reported increased confidence and greater ownership of their academic work. The study argues that structured pre-AI planning activities can strengthen critical thinking and academic literacy by positioning AI as a support tool rather than a substitute for cognitive effort. The findings contribute practical guidance for educators seeking to integrate AI into higher education while preserving student agency and deep learning.
Keywords: generative AI, academic literacy, design-based research, cognitive agency, higher education, AI-supported learning

CITATION (APA)

Collins, G. W. (2026). Paper-first knowledge engineering as a pedagogical framework for cognitive agency in AI-assisted learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), ep700. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19638

REFERENCES

  1. Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29-40.
  2. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8
  3. Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337
  4. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  5. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003
  6. Davies, S. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
  7. Giarratano, J. C., & Riley, G. (1994). Expert systems: Principles and programming. PWS Publishing Co.
  8. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Prentice Hall.
  9. Kwet, M., & Prinsloo, P. (2020). The ‘smart’ classroom: A new frontier in the age of the smart university. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 510-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1734922 .
  10. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., & Lockyer, L.(2020). Digital learning environments, the science of learning and the relationship between the teacher and the learner. In A. Carroll, R. Cunnington, & A. Nugent (Eds.), Learning under the lens: Applying findings from the science of learning to the classroom (pp.1-15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027833-11
  11. Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL IOE Press.
  12. Luckin, R., & Bagshaw, P. (2025). Charting an AI course: A framework for higher education strategy development. In S. Popenici, J. Rudolph, F. Ismail, & S. Tan (Eds.), Handbook of artificial intelligence in higher education (pp. 30-53). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035338764.00009
  13. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
  14. Ose Askvik, E., Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. H. (2020). The importance of cursive handwriting over typewriting for learning in the classroom: A high-density EEG study of 12-year-old children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810
  15. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
  16. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350145573
  17. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  18. Sweller, J. (2023) The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
  19. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
  20. Tversky, B. (2019). Mind in motion: How action shapes thought. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325525
  21. Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. H. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: Highlighting the importance of handwriting in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219945