Review Article

Mapping research on ChatGPT and LLMs in EFL writing: A scoping review with bibliometric analysis

Georgia Andreou 1 , Pinelopi Christani 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, GREECE* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), July 2026, ep676, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19080
Published: 06 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   156 Views   75 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The present paper investigates the current trends of second language learning and teaching mediated by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools, like ChatGPT and other large language models within the English as a foreign language (EFL) writing context. Scopus, which is a major database, was carefully researched using targeted keywords. All the inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented consistently, and a total set of 43 articles were finally analyzed to synthesize the present review. The PRISMA method was implemented to ensure transparency and reliability, whereas the bibliometrix R-tool was utilized to generate clear and vivid visual depictions of the bibliometric data. This study adopts a complementary dual-method design, combining a scoping review approach with a bibliometric analysis to investigate the use of GenAI in EFL writing instruction. The scoping review serves as the primary analytical component of the study, identifying major pedagogical themes, applications, and challenges related to artificial intelligence-supported writing enhancement. The bibliometric analysis is used to contextualize the structure and evolution of the field by mapping its intellectual structure, publication evolution, influential publications, productive authors, institutional affiliations and keyword trends. The synthesis of the reviewed studies indicates that AI-assisted feedback is frequently associated with improvements in grammar, vocabulary, coherence, and learner engagement. Several studies also highlight challenges, including concerns about academic integrity, students’ overreliance on AI, and the necessity for teacher guidance. By systematically synthesizing these results, this review offers a clear picture of current practices, emerging trends, and research gaps, providing insights for researchers, educators and policymakers in the EFL domain. This study has certain limitations such as filtering constraints and strict time limits, but there are some useful guidelines that researchers can utilize in their future research.
Keywords: generative artificial intelligence, large language models, ChatGPT, English as a foreign language, language learning, writing skills, scoping review

CITATION (APA)

Andreou, G., & Christani, P. (2026). Mapping research on ChatGPT and LLMs in EFL writing: A scoping review with bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), ep676. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19080

REFERENCES

  1. Adhikari, C., Das, P. K., & Biswas, S. D. (2025). AI in higher education: An analysis of ChatGPT’s impact on scholarly communication. Educational Point, 2(2), Article e137. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17641
  2. Afandi, I. (2024). Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT. XLinguae, 17(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.04
  3. Alhazmi, A. A., & Muftah, M. (2025). Evaluating ChatGPT’s reliability in second language acquisition (SLA): Insights on language skills and technology’s role. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(1), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.1.3762
  4. Aljasser, A. (2025). Investigating EFL students’ perceptions of feedback: A comparative study of instructor and ChatGPT-generated responses in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22967-22988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13649-8
  5. Alkhawaldeh, M. A., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). Language learning tools and improvements in speaking and writing skills. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 58(5), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.58.5.33
  6. Allen, T. J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). ChatGPT over my friends: Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language learners’ preferences for editing and proofreading strategies. RELC Journal, 57(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241262533
  7. Almahasees, Z., Al-Natour, M., Bataineh, K. A., & Aminzadeh, S. (2024). Students’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of integrating ChatGPT in higher education. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 3479-3494. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00256
  8. Alsaweed, W., & Aljebreen, S. (2024). Investigating the accuracy of ChatGPT as a writing error correction tool. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.364847
  9. Alwasidi, M. A., & Al-Khalifah, K. S. (2025). Assessing the impact of ChatGPT on EFL students’ writing productivity and proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(3), 986-995. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1603.29
  10. Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M., & Alyami, N. (2025). Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching and learning? Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15147-15184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8
  11. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  12. Asadi, M., Ebadi, S., & Mohammadi, L. (2025). The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, Article 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766
  13. Bekturova, M., Tulepova, S., & Zhaitapova, A. (2025). Predicting Kazakhstani TEFL students’ continuance intention towards using ChatGPT in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 11889-11909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13306-6
  14. Belda-Medina, J., & Kokošková, V. (2024). ChatGPT for language learning: Assessing teacher candidates’ skills and perceptions using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 20(3), 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2435900
  15. Benke, E., & Szőke, A. (2024). Academic integrity in the time of artificial intelligence: Exploring student attitudes. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2024-2-5
  16. Bristi, N. L., Shafie, L. A., Hajimia, H. B., & Hasan, K. (2025). Decoding EFL Learners’ intention to use ChatGPT for academic writing: Cognitive and emotional drivers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.1
  17. Campos, M. (2025). AI-assisted feedback in CLIL courses as a self-regulated language learning mechanism: Students’ perceptions and experiences. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1568
  18. Chen, C. (2016). Grand challenges in measuring and characterizing scholarly impact. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00004
  19. Chen, J., & Delaney, V. (2025). Leveraging AI to enhance children’s learning: Anchoring policy and practice in equity, AI literacy, and ethics for education leaders and teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 54, 2655-2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-02036-0
  20. Chung, J. Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2024). Exploring the perceptions of Chinese pre-service teachers on the integration of generative AI in English language teaching: Benefits, challenges, and educational implications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), Article e202457. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15266
  21. Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3803-3827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4
  22. Dinh, C. T. (2025). Undergraduate English majors’ views on ChatGPT in academic writing: Perceived vocabulary and grammar improvement. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1). http://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Spring2025/1
  23. Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
  24. Han, J. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context. System, 126, Article 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502
  25. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  26. Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Examining the relationship between the L2 motivational self-system and technology acceptance model post ChatGPT introduction and utilization. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100302
  27. Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2025). The effects of generative AI usage in EFL classrooms on the L2 motivational self-system. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6435-6454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13071-6
  28. Huang, Y., & Wang, D. (2025). Can ChatGPT serve as a writing collaborator? Insights from Chinese EFL learners. System, 133, Article 103775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103775
  29. Jmaiel, H. A., Abukhait, R. O., Mohamed, A. M., Shaaban, T. S., Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Al-Qadri, A. H. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL students’ ESP writing skills: An experimental study of gender and major differences. Discover Education, 4, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00700-6
  30. Kanwal, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on psychological factors in learning English writing among undergraduate students. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p404
  31. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  32. Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2025). A comparative study of Google Gemini and ChatGPT in enhancing English language learning for EFL learners: A case study of the English research writing course. Pedagogical Research, 10(4), Article em0251. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/17670
  33. Kim, M., & Chon, Y. V. (2025). The impact of self-revision, machine translation, and ChatGPT on L2 writing: Raters’ assessments, linguistic complexity, and error correction. Assessing Writing, 65, Article 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100950
  34. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
  35. Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2
  36. Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
  37. Lu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2025). Exploring the use of ChatGPT-generated model texts as a feedback instrument: EFL students’ text quality and perceptions. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2525341
  38. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
  39. Minaee, S., Mikolov, T., Nikzad, N., Chenaghlu, M., Socher, R., Amatriain, X., & Gao, J. (2025). Large language models: A survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.06196
  40. Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), Article 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050
  41. Mohammad, N. M., Demers, M., McCubbin, E., Mitchell, J., & Fulmer, S. (2025). How college students use ChatGPT. Pedagogical Research, 10(4), Article em0250. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/17428
  42. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  43. Neshkovska, S., Ivanovska, L., Trajkovska, V., & Kasaposka-Chadlovska, M. (2025). ChatGPT in foreign language acquisition: A close ally or a distant concept for Macedonian university students? Respectus Philologicus, 47(52), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2025.47.4
  44. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
  45. Pack, A., Barrett, A., & Escalante, J. (2024). Large language models and automated essay scoring of English language learner writing: Insights into validity and reliability. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100234
  46. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  47. Park, J. (2025). A systematic literature review of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) literacy in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100487
  48. Poláková, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
  49. Pum, M. (2025). The paradox of augmentation and erosion: Navigating utility, critical agency, and trust deficit in AI writing tools among Cambodian English major undergraduates. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 1(1), Article e105. https://doi.org/10.71176/interedtech/17573
  50. Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: The role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—A case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
  51. Rahayu, A., Tarihoran, N., Rahmawati, E., Muslihah, E., & Ma’mur, I. (2025). Navigating the digital writing landscape: EFL students’ perspectives on ChatGPT utilization. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.37
  52. Salam, U. (2025). The integration of ChatGPT in English for foreign language course: Elevating AI writing assistant acceptance. Computers in the Schools, 42(2), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2446239
  53. Sawangwan, S. (2024). ChatGPT vs teacher roles in developing EFL writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.361235
  54. Seo, J.-Y. (2024). Exploring the educational potential of ChatGPT: AI-assisted narrative writing for EFL college students. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.01
  55. Shabara, R., ElEbyary, K., & Boraie, D. (2024). Teachers or ChatGPT: The issue of accuracy and consistency in L2 assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2), 71-92.
  56. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
  57. Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270
  58. Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive awareness and EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in utilising ChatGPT for writing feedback. European Journal of Education, 60(1), Article e12811. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811
  59. Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2025). Incorporating ChatGPT for EFL writing and its effects on writing engagement. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.367874
  60. Thi, X. H. N., Thien, H. V. H., Vuong, K. N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2025). Enhancing writing skills through AI-powered tools: Perceived benefits and challenges among Vietnamese EFL students. Discover Education, 4, Article 472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00905-9
  61. Tica, L., & Krsmanović, I. (2024). Overcoming the writer’s block? Exploring students’ motivation and perspectives on using ChatGPT as a writing assistance tool in ESP. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 21(1), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.4312/ELOPE.21.1.129-149
  62. Tram, N. H. M., Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, C. D. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for self-learning English among EFL learners: A multi-methods study. System, 127, Article 103528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103528
  63. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  64. Tsai, C.-Y., Lin, Y.-T., & Brown, I. K. (2024). Impacts of ChatGPT-assisted writing for EFL English majors: Feasibility and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22427-22445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12722-y
  65. Tseng, Y., & Lin, Y. (2024). Enhancing English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing with ChatGPT: A university-level course design. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2024, 78-97. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329
  66. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  67. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  68. Wang, Y. (2024). Cognitive and sociocultural dynamics of self-regulated use of machine translation and generative AI tools in academic EFL writing. System, 126, Article 103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103505
  69. Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N., & Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228
  70. Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2025). EFL secondary students’ use of ChatGPT for writing task completion pathways. Journal of Educational Research, 118(6), 596-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2510382
  71. Yang, C. T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2025). ChatGPT and L2 Chinese writing: Evaluating the impact of model version and prompt language on automated corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(4), 1119-1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2453205
  72. Yasmin, M., Fatima, W., & Irshad, I. (2025). Evaluating ChatGPT’s effectiveness in enhancing argumentative writing: A quasi-experimental study of EFL learners in Pakistan. Sustainable Futures, 10, Article 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100809
  73. Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers’ roles. Heliyon, 10(2), Article e24289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24289
  74. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  75. Zou, S., Guo, K., Wang, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). Investigating students’ uptake of teacher-and ChatGPT-generated feedback in EFL writing: A comparison study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(4), 1062-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2447279