Research Article

Local Language Numeracy Kindergarten Prototype Design to Support Home-based Learning During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic

Vusumuzi Maphosa 1 * , Bekithemba Dube 2
More Detail
1 Lupane State University, Department of ICT, Zimbabwe2 University of the Free State, South Africa* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), July 2021, ep301, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10846
OPEN ACCESS   3066 Views   1730 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused unprecedented global socio-economic disruptions. One of the areas negatively impacted is the education system. The country’s over reliance on traditional face-to-face teaching has brought about serious challenges to policymakers who have to decide how learning would proceed in the absence of physical contact between the teacher and the learner. This has been exacerbated by the general lack of access to textbooks and other teaching and learning materials which makes it difficult for parents to assist with home schooling. The potential use of mobile apps to support and enhance early childhood learning has received little attention in developing countries such as Zimbabwe, yet its impact in supporting early childhood education would be enormous during and post the COVID-19 pandemic. The study seeks to develop a numeracy-based app prototype that uses a local language (IsiNdebele) in a classroom or home-based schooling in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or other natural disasters or man-made situations that may make face-to-face interaction impossible. The analysis showed that kindergarten teachers had positive opinion towards the app as they perceived the prototype to be useful, easy to use, simple and that learners would be eager to use it. The results of this study can inform policymakers and educators on optimising technology based early teaching and learning at school and home.

CITATION (APA)

Maphosa, V., & Dube, B. (2021). Local Language Numeracy Kindergarten Prototype Design to Support Home-based Learning During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep301. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10846

REFERENCES

  1. Akwa, T. E., Ning, T. R., & Maingi, J. M. (2020). Assessing the Perceptions and Awareness of COVID-19 (Coronavirus) in Cameroon. European Journal of Medical and Educational Technologies, 13(2), em2007. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejmets/8236
  2. Annie, A. (2017, May 3). Discover the Countries Leading in App Usage. Retrieved from global-consumer-app-usage-data: https://www.appannie.com/en/insights/market-data/global-consumer-app-usage-data/
  3. Athanaselis, T., Bakamidis, S., Dologlou, I., Argyriou, E. N., & Symvonis, A. (2014). Making assistive reading tools user friendly: A new platform for Greek dyslexic students empowered by automatic speech recognition. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(3), 681-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1073-5
  4. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0060. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
  5. Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350, 196-198. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7427
  6. Berson, I., & Berson, M. (2010). High-Tech Tots: Childhood in a Digital World. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  7. Bus, G., Takacs, K., & Sari, B. (2019). What are we dowloading for our children? Best selling children’s apps in four European countries. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 19(4), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417744057
  8. Cabell, Q., Zucker, A., DeCoster, J., Copp, B., & Landry, S. (2019). Impact of a Parent Text Messaging Program on Pre-Kindergarteners’ Literacy Development. AERA Open, 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419833339
  9. Center Pew Research. (2018, February 5). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/
  10. Chaudron, S., Beutel, M. E., Cernikova, M., Donoso-Navarette, V., Dreier, M., Fletcher-Watson, B., & W€olfling, K. B. (2015). Young children (0-8) and digital technology: a qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239
  11. Cheung, C. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2012). Why does parents’ involvement enhance children’s achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 820-832. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027183
  12. Cohen, M., Hadley, M., & Frank, M. (2011). Young Children, Apps & iPad. New York: Michael Cohen.
  13. Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2015). Parental reports on touch screen use in early childhood. PLoS One, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128338
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  15. Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Learning in Higher Institutions of Education: A Survey of the Perceptions of Ghanaian International Students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/8286
  16. Ebbeck, M., Yim, H., Chan, Y., & Goh, M. (2016). Singaporean parents’ views of their young children’s access and use of technological devices. Early Child Educ., 44(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0695-4
  17. Elimelech, A., & Aram, D. (2019). A Digital Early Spelling Game: The Role of Auditory and Visual Support. AERA Open, 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419857702
  18. Flewitt, R. (2012). Multimodal perspectives on early childhood literacies. In L. J, & M. J, The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy (pp. 295-310). London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247518.n17
  19. Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15, 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414533560
  20. Genc, Z. (2014). Parents’ perceptions about the mobile technology use of preschool aged children. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 146, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.086
  21. Gordon, A., & Williams-Browne, K. (2016). Beginnings and Beyond: Foundations in early childhood education. Toronto: Nelson.
  22. Guernsey, L. (2014). Envisioning a Digital Age Architecture for Early Education. Retrieved from New America-Education Policy Program, Washington DC. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/policy-papers/envisioning-a-digital-age-architecture-for-early-education
  23. Hoffman, J., & Paciga, K. (2014). Click, Swipe, and Read: Sharing e-Books with Toddlers and Preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(6), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0622-5
  24. Jones, C. D. (2015). Effects of writing instruction on kindergarten students’ writing achievement: An experimental study. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.836466
  25. Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner, R. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136, 1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2151
  26. Kucirkova, N. (2014). iPads in early education: Separating assumptions. and evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 715-721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00715
  27. Kucirkova, N., & Zuckerman, B. (2017). A guiding framework for considering touchscreens in children under two. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact., 12, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.03.001
  28. Lancaster, H. (2016, July 25). Zimbabwe Telecoms, mobile and broadband - statistics and analyses. Retrieved from https://www.budde.com.au: https://www.budde.com.au/Research/Zimbabwe-Telecoms-Mobile-and-Broadband-Statistics-and-Analyses
  29. Lee, C., & Cherner, T. S. (2015). A comprehensive evaluation rubric for assessing instructional apps. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 21-53. https://doi.org/10.28945/2097
  30. Livingstone, S., Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S., & Fletcher-Watson, B. (2014). Young children (0-8) and digital technology: a qualitative exploratory study UK. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
  31. Lowyck, J. (2014). Bridging learning theories and technology enhanced environments: A critical appraisal of its history. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_1
  32. Mailizar, A. A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Views on E-learning Implementation Barriers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case ofIndonesia. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240
  33. Mangwaya, E., Jeko, I., & Manyumwa, C. (2013). Availability of Print Curriculum Materials and Its Consequences for the Quality of Education in Schools Located on Newly Resettled Farm Areas in Zimbabwe. Asian Social Science, 9(1), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n1p249
  34. Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 870-882. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12622
  35. Meyer, M., Adkins, V., Yuan, N., Weeks, H., Chang, Y., & Radesky, J. (2019). Advertising in young children’s apps: A content analysis. Dev. Behav. Pediatr., 40(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000622
  36. Neumann, M. (2016). Young children’s use of touch screen tablets for writing and reading at home. Relationships with emergent literacy Comput Educ., 97, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.013
  37. Nielsen. (2012). American Families See Tablets as Playmate, Teacher and Babysitter. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2012/american-families-see-tablets-as-playmate-teacher-and-babysitter/
  38. Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
  39. O’Connor, J. (2016). A threat to childhood innocence or the future of learning? Parents’ perspectives on the use of touch-screen technology by 0-3 year-olds in the UK. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(2), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116647290
  40. OCHA. (2020, April 17). Zimbabwe Education Cluster: Humanitarian Response & COVID-19 Sitrep: 16 April 2020. Retrieved from Zimbabwe: https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/zimbabwe-education-cluster-humanitarian-response-covid-19-sitrep-16-april-2020
  41. Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315785233
  42. Papadakis, J., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). An evaluation of Greek educational Android apps for preschoolers. 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) (pp. 593-603). Researchgate.
  43. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). eTwinning in the early childhood as starting line of innovative practices for the didactic of natural sciences. In M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou, & P. G. Michaelides (Ed.), HSci 2010: 7th international conference hands-on science (pp. 25-31). Crete.
  44. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Using scratch and app inventor for teaching introductory programming in secondary education. A case study. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8, 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.082317
  45. Papadakis, S., Zaranis, N., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Parental involvement and attitudes towards young Greek children’s mobile usage. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 22(2019), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.100144
  46. Papapicco, C. (2020). Informative Contagion: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) in Italian journalism. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202014. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7938
  47. Paratore, J. R., Cassano, C. M., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2011). Supporting early (and later) literacy development at home and at school: The long view. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 107-135). New York: Routledge.
  48. Pitchford, J., Kamchedzera, R., Hubber, J., & Chigeda, L. (2018). Interactive Apps Promote Learning of Basic Mathematics in Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. Front. Psychol, 9(262), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00262
  49. Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2012). Preschool children’s learning with technology at home. Comput. Educ, 59(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.014
  50. Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning (Vol. 9). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
  51. Rideout, V. (2017). The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/csm_zerotoeight_fullreport_release_2.pdf
  52. Roser, M., Ritchie, H., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Hasell, J. (2020, April 27). Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Retrieved from OurWorldInData.org: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#citation
  53. Simon, F., Nemeth, K., & McManis, D. (2013). Technology in ECE classrooms: Results of a new survey and implications for the field. Exchange, 35(5), 68-75.
  54. Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893
  55. Stephen, C., Stevenson, O., & Adey, C. (2013). Young children engaged with technologies at home: The influence of family context. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 11(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X12466215
  56. Strouse, A., & Ganea, P. (2017). Parent–Toddler Behavior and Language Differ When Reading Electronic and Print Picture Books. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00677
  57. SundayNews. (2020, April 26). Pupils to receive lessons through radio. Retrieved from https://www.sundaynews.co.zw/category/local/: https://www.sundaynews.co.zw/pupils-to-receive-lessons-through-radio/
  58. Tanhan, A., Yavuz, K., Young, J., Nalbant, A., Arslan, G., Yıldırım, M., . . . Çiçek, İ. (2020). A Proposed Framework Based on Literature Review of Online Contextual Mental Health Services to Enhance Wellbeing and Address Psychopathology During COVID-19. Electonic Journal on Gen Med, 17(6), em254. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/8316
  59. UNICEF. (2020, February 19). Humanitarian Appeal Revision. Retrieved from unicef.org/zimbabwe/media: https://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/media/1921/file/Revised%20Zimbabwe%20Flash%20Appeal.pdf
  60. Usak, M., Masalimova, A. R., Cherdymova, E. I., & Shaidullina, A. R. (2020). New playmaker in science education: COVID-19. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.180
  61. Vanderloo, L. (2014). Screen viewing among preschoolers in childcare: A systematic review. BMC Paediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-205
  62. Vittrup, B., Snider, S., Rose, K., & Rippy, J. (2014). Parental perceptions of the role of media and technology in their young children’s lives. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 14(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14523749
  63. Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using Mobile Devices for Teaching Realistic Mathematics in Kindergarten Education. Creative Education, 4(7A1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A1001