Research Article

Investigating the use of AI tools in English language learning: A phenomenological approach

Wu Xiaofan 1 , Nagaletchimee Annamalai 1 2 *
More Detail
1 School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, MALAYSIA2 Department of Languages and Culture, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), April 2025, ep578, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16188
Published Online: 20 March 2025, Published: 01 April 2025
OPEN ACCESS   4779 Views   23581 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This investigation utilized a phenomenological approach to investigate the experience of English language educators in employing artificial intelligence (AI) tools into English language learning. The study used purposive sampling and 20 participants were interviewed. The data analysis was guided by Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory, particularly microsystem, exosystem, and macrosystem. The findings demonstrated that the AI tools enable interactive, personalized, and gamified learning experiences that enhance student engagement, motivation, and English proficiency. The study also emphasized the importance of technological content knowledge and technological pedagogical knowledge in improving instructional methodologies. Challenges, including AI-related distractions and reduced direct interaction between educators and students, were identified, necessitating a balanced integration of these tools despite the inherent advantages. Furthermore, the research underscored the significance of institutional support, which encompasses ongoing professional development and technical assistance, to facilitate the successful integration of AI into education.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, English language learning, phenomenology, qualitative study, technology

CITATION (APA)

Xiaofan, W., & Annamalai, N. (2025). Investigating the use of AI tools in English language learning: A phenomenological approach. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), ep578. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16188

REFERENCES

  1. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
  2. Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39
  3. Annamalai, N. (2024). Factors affecting English language high school teachers switching intention to ChatGPT: a push-pull-mooring theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2371928
  4. Annamalai, N., Eltahir, M. E., Zyoud, S. H., Soundrarajan, D., Zakarneh, B., & Al Salhi, N. R. (2023). Exploring English language learning via Chabot: A case study from a self-determination theory perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100148
  5. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
  6. Bolton, K., & Graddol, D. (2012). English in China today: The current popularity of English in China is unprecedented, and has been fueled by the recent political and social development of Chinese society. English Today, 28(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078412000223
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological system theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak, & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3–44). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  11. Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
  12. Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics, 2, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z
  13. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.
  14. Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
  15. Chu, W., Liu, H., & Fang, F. (2021). A tale of three excellent Chinese EFL teachers: Unpacking teacher professional qualities for their sustainable career trajectories from an ecological perspective. Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126721
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  17. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  18. Du, Z. (2024). Optimization analysis of AI intelligent English teaching strategies based on computer virtual reality technology. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(3), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.1290
  19. Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.313
  20. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  21. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  22. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–55). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208574.n4
  23. Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human-machine communication research agenda. New Media & society, 22(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
  24. Heffernan, T. (2021). Academic networks and career trajectory: ‘There’s no career in academia without networks’. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1799948
  25. Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad and the ugly. RELC Journal, 54(2), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504
  26. Hofstadler, N., Babic, S., Lammerer, A., Mercer, S., & Oberdorfer, P. (2020). The ecology of CLIL teachers in Austria e an ecological perspective on CLIL teachers’ wellbeing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1739050
  27. Holmes, A. V. (2019). Voices from within: Teacher sensitivity in an early childhood elementary school [Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College].
  28. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
  29. Hsu, P. S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0014-3
  30. Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhao, X. (2023): Examining factors influencing Chinese ethnic minority English teachers’ technology adoption: An extension of the UTAUT model. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2239304
  31. Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
  32. Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. V. (2008). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 8(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_194
  33. Lan, Y. (2024). Through tensions to identity-based motivations: Exploring teacher professional identity in Artificial Intelligence-enhanced teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, Article 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736
  34. Lewis, S. C., Guzman, A. L., & Schmidt, T. R. (2019). Automation, journalism, and human-machine communication: Rethinking roles and relationships of humans and machines in news. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1577147
  35. Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. We Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
  36. Liang, F., Shen, W., & Chen, L. (2023). Research on the evaluation of deeply intelligent classroom teaching and learning in colleges and universities based on data analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0255
  37. Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175
  38. Long, J., & Lin, J. (2023). Empowering English language learning and mental health using AI and big data. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 12703–12734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12267-6
  39. Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Baltes, J., Guerra, R., Li, P., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820
  40. Mansfield, C. F., Ebersohn, L., Beltman, S., & Loots, T. (2018). Great southern lands: Making space for teacher resilience in South Africa and Australia. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 53–71). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76690-4_4
  41. Mercer, S. (2021). An agenda for well-being in ELT: An ecological perspective. ELT Journal, 75(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa062
  42. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  43. Miller, E. R., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System, 79, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.002
  44. Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human-AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
  45. Nazari, M., Karimi, M. N., & De Costa, P. I. (2023). Emotion and identity construction in teachers of young learners of English: An ecological perspective. System, 112, Article 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102972
  46. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146
  47. Peng, J.-E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002
  48. Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
  49. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
  50. Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Zahid, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 3691–3716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9
  51. Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003
  52. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford University Press.
  53. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
  54. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  55. Wang, D., & Han, H. (2021). Applying learning analytics dashboards based on process-oriented feedback to improve students’ learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12502
  56. Wei, J. (2024). The feasibility of integrating natural language model in daily English education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 73, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/73/20241031
  57. Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Lv, X., Ai, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Anthropomorphism and customers’ willingness to use artificial intelligence service agents. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1926037
  58. Yuan, L. (2024). Where does AI-driven education, in the Chinese context and beyond, go next? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00341-6
  59. Zein, S. (2019). Classroom management for teaching English to young learners. In S. Garton, & F. Copland (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 154–168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623672-11
  60. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807