Research Article
Innovative teaching: How pre-service teachers use artificial intelligence to teach science to fourth graders
More Detail
1 Arab American University, Jenin, PALESTINE* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), January 2025, ep547, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15686
Published Online: 05 December 2024, Published: 01 January 2025
OPEN ACCESS 356 Views 281 Downloads
ABSTRACT
This study aims to uncover the prompts most frequently repeated by pre-service teachers when using the Copilot technique, as well as their reflections on its use in preparing and planning science lessons for fourth graders. The qualitative research methodology with an exploratory case-study design was conducted on a purposeful sample of 20 pre-service teachers. The sample was divided into four focus groups. Data was collected through document analysis of the outcomes from the pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence creations, their reflective journal entries, and the discussion that occurred during the four focus groups’ interviews. The study’s results revealed that the applications mostly used by pre-service teachers include lesson plans, instructional media, authentic assessment, tables, pictures, drawings, and instructional strategies. Six themes emerged from the reflective Journal and focus groups’ interview analysis connected to the use of the Copilot method in teaching. These themes were the following: developing cognition of new ideas, attracting attention to things that never crossed their minds, saving time and effort, compatibility with students’ needs, less human interaction, and dependency.
CITATION (APA)
Abualrob, M. M. (2025). Innovative teaching: How pre-service teachers use artificial intelligence to teach science to fourth graders. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep547. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15686
REFERENCES
- Abualrob, M., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2011). The Delphi technique in identifying learning objectives for the development of science, technology and society modules for Palestinian ninth grade science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2538–2558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.610381
- Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R. (2023). Generative AI in education and research: Opportunities, concerns, and solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2965–2971. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00323
- Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O., & Ishola, A. M. (2024). Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (2018). Methods for effective teaching: Meeting the needs of all students (8th ed.). Pearson.
- Catlin, D., & Blamires, M. (2019). Designing robots for special needs education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9378-8
- Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
- Chatterjee, J., & Dethlefs, N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide ... and even your worst enemy. Patterns, 4(1), Article 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676
- Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020a). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
- Chen, Y., & Liu, M. (2022). AI and inquiry-based learning: Supporting collaborative science learning in elementary education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 345–367.
- Clark, T. M. (2023). Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), Article 19051916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027
- Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
- Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
- Dieker, L., Hynes, M., Hughes, C., & Smith, E. (2019). Exploring the use of AI and VR simulations in pre-service teacher training: Enhancing classroom preparedness. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 243–255.
- Flynn, S. V., & Korcuska, J. S. (2018). Credible phenomenological research: A mixed-methods study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12092
- García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, Article e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
- Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research in Education and Media, 12(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003
- Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), Article ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
- Haseski, H. I. (2019). What do Turkish pre-service teachers think about artificial intelligence? International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i2.55
- Hooks, B. (2022). Who is Bell Hooks and why should a teacher read her work? https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-practice/bell-hooks-teacher-read-work
- Igbokwe, I. C. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational management. International Journal of Scientific Research and Publication, 13(3), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.03.2023.p13536
- Khalil, M., & Er, E. (2023). Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of plagiarism detection. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fnh48
- Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for supporting teaching and learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 141–151.
- Martineau, K. (2023). What is generative AI? IBM. https://research.ibm.com/blog/what-is-generative-AI
- Mehta, J., & Aguilera, E. (2020). Challenges of integrating AI into teacher education: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(4), 493–512.
- Mu, P. (2019). Research on artificial intelligence education and its value orientation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Education Technology and Research Conference (pp. 771–775).
- Nah, F. F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814
- Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994?locale=es
- Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
- Rodríguez-García, J. D., Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., & Robles, G. (2021). Evaluation of an online intervention to teach artificial intelligence with LearningML to 10-16-year-old students. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 177–183). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432393
- Ryu, M., & Han, S. (2018). The educational perception on artificial intelligence by elementary school teachers. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.317
- Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.001
- Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 107–121.
- Stockman, C., & Nottingham, E. (2022). Surveillance capitalism in schools: What’s the problem? Digital Culture & Education, 14(1), 1–15.
- Sung, Y. T., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). The effectiveness of AI-driven game-based learning on engagement and learning outcomes in science education. Computers & Education, 160, Article 104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023
- Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
- Talanquer, V. (2023). Interview with the chatbot: How does it reason? Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2821–2824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00472
- Tarraga-Minguez, R., Suarez-Guerrero, C., & Sanz-Cervera, P. (2021). Digital teaching competence evaluation of pre-service teachers in Spain: A review study. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 16(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3052848
- Touretzky, D., Martin, F., Seehorn, D., Breazeal, C., & Posner, T. (2019). Special session: AI for K12 guidelines initiative. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293729
- Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
- van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
- Walker, T. (2023). Survey: Teachers work more hours per week than other working adults. National Education Association. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/allnews-articles/survey-teachers-work-more-hours-week-other-working-adults
- Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
- Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
- Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Wang, R. (2021). Leveraging AI for lesson planning and content differentiation in elementary science education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), Article 45.
- Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025