Research Article

Improving the Use of Technology Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education in the UK: A Qualitative Visualization of Students’ Views

Mark Kennedy 1 * , Thomas J. Dunn 2
More Detail
1 King’s College-London, United Kingdom2 Bishop Grosseteste University, United Kingdom* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), January 2018, 76-89, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6212
OPEN ACCESS   2533 Views   1643 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the use of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) has risen exponentially throughout higher education in the UK. Whilst TEL is an umbrella term for a range of technologies, evidence suggests that in the UK, TEL is usually delivered via the medium of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) for the provision of lecture materials and additional content. An emerging literature has established both the pedagogical potential and students’ perceived usefulness of TEL. However, researchers have yet to establish how the use of TEL via VLEs can be improved – a core requirement of establishing best practice. The current study sought to address this in a sample of 487 predominately undergraduate students. Content analysis revealed that views were overwhelmingly positive, but that students had clear views on what they wanted to see improved. Students expressed clear desires for the more consistent and more frequent use of TEL within lectures. Further, they felt that the potential of TEL to encourage and facilitate interactions, both within their University and with external stakeholders, has thus far gone unexploited. Implications for teaching practice and future research are discussed.
Keywords: Technology enhanced learning, Virtual learning environment, E-learning

CITATION (APA)

Kennedy, M., & Dunn, T. J. (2018). Improving the Use of Technology Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education in the UK: A Qualitative Visualization of Students’ Views. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6212

REFERENCES

  1. Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don't trust anyone under 30). London: Penguin.
  2. Browne, T., Hewitt, R., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2008). 2008 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK. ALT-C 2008: Rethinking the digital divide.
  3. Conole, G. (2014). The use of technology in distance education. Online distance education: Towards a research agenda, 217-236.
  4. Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2016). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities. Pearson.
  5. Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73-87.
  6. Fellows (2014). Wordcloud Package. Retrieved from CRAN: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/index.html
  7. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 1-13.
  8. Higher Education Academy. (2008). e-Learning benchmarking and pathfinder programme 2005–2008: an overview. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/learningandtech/bandpglossyfinal_update19mar09
  9. Higher Education Academy. (2009). Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/learningandtech/transforming_he_through_technology_enhanced_ learning
  10. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2005).HEFCE strategy for e-learning. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/
  11. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2009). Enhancing learning and teaching through the use of technology: a revised approach to HEFCE’s strategy for e-learning. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_12/09_12.pdf
  12. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
  13. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ASCILITE Melbourne 2008 (pp. 484-492). Melbourne: ASCLITE.
  14. Kondracki, N. L., & Wellman, N. S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 224-230.
  15. Lairio, M., Puukari, S., & Kouvo, A. (2013). Studying at university as part of student life and identity construction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 115-131.
  16. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247-254.
  17. Macaskill, A., & Denovan, A. (2013). Developing autonomous learning in first year university students using perspectives from positive psychology. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 124-142.
  18. Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 450-454.
  19. Olofsson, A. D., & Lindberg, J. O. (2014). Introduction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23 (3), 285-291.
  20. Pechenkina, E., & Aeschliman, C. (2017). What Do Students Want? Making Sense of Student Preferences in Technology-Enhanced Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 26-39.
  21. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
  22. Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in Scandinavia content analysis: An introduction. In K. E. Rosengren (Ed.), Advances in content analysis (pp. 9-19). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  23. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73.
  24. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook. Learning, media and technology, 34(2), 157-174. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 17439880902923622
  25. Selwyn, N. (2016). Minding our language: why education and technology is full of bullshit…and what might be done about it. Learning, Media & Technology, 41(3), 437-443. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523
  26. Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12-33. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2012.12.022
  27. UCISA., 2016. Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for higher education in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/-/media/Files/publications/surveys/TEL%20Survey%202016_Nov16
  28. Walker, R., Voce, J., & Jenkins, M. (2016). Charting the development of technology-enhanced learning developments across the UK higher education sector: A longitudinal perspective (2001–2012). Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 438-455.