Research Article

Improving Students’ Narrative Skills through Gameplay Activities: A Study of Primary School Students

Sotiris Kirginas 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Communication and Mass Media, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), April 2022, ep351, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11526
Published: 09 January 2022
OPEN ACCESS   1997 Views   1259 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to explore the impact of freeform digital games on primary school students’ narrative skills, in terms of linguistic cohesion and semantic coherence, compared to other digital media, such as formally structured digital games and movies. A total of 128 Year 6 Primary school students participated in this research. Initially, students were divided into three groups. In all three groups, an educational intervention programme was applied. At the end of this phase, each student was asked to produce a narrative discourse (pre-test) about Crusoe’s survival on the mysterious island. Subsequently, students of each group were involved in activities with different digital material. At the last part of the research, students were asked to produce a narrative discourse (post-test) which was compared to the pre-test discourse, to determine whether there had been an improvement in the narrative discourse produced by the students of the three groups. The results presented in this paper show that the narrative discourses of students who played with the freeform digital game showed statistically significant improvement in cohesion and coherence compared to the discourse of students who played with the formally structured digital game and the students who watched the film.
Keywords: freeform digital games, structured digital games, narrative skills, primary school

CITATION (APA)

Kirginas, S. (2022). Improving Students’ Narrative Skills through Gameplay Activities: A Study of Primary School Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), ep351. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11526

REFERENCES

  1. Barab, S., Pettyjohn, P., Gresalfi, M., Volk, C., & Solomou, M. (2012). Game-based curriculum and transformational play: Designing to meaningfully positioning person, content, and context, Computers & Education, 58(1), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.001
  2. Beentjes, J. W., Koolstra, C. M., Marseille, N., & Voort, T. H. (2001). Children’s use of different media: For how long and why? In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment-A European comparative study (pp. 85-111). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Bing, J. (2013). Enhancing narrative writing skills through action-adventure video games. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(15), 36-42.
  4. Busuttil, L., Gruppetta, C., & Camillieri. V. (2016). Minecraft schooling: Digital learning for junior years. In D. Russell, & J. Laffey (Eds.), Handbook of research on gaming trends in P-12 education (pp.481-501). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9629-7.ch023
  5. Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play, game. University of Illinois Press (Original work published 1958).
  6. Chen, M., Tseng, W., & Hsiao, T. (2018). The effectiveness of digital game-based
  7. vocabulary learning: A framework-based view of meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12526
  8. Chen, S., Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, J. J. (2020). Effects of games on students’ emotions of learning science and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2224-2245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1817607
  9. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Student’s metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly 11(1), 19-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511035
  10. Ferrari, M., Bouffard, T., & Rainville, L. (1998). What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers’ self-regulation of writing. Instructional Science, 26(6), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003202412203
  11. Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to ludology. http://www.ludology.org/articles/VGT_final.pdf
  12. Graham S., Harris K. R. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: Programmatic research in writing. In B. Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (Disorders of human learning, behavior, and communication). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2786-1_3
  13. Hardy, R., & Miller, G. (1997). Robinson Crusoe [Film]. Miramax.
  14. Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press.
  15. Karakoc, B., Eryilmaz, K., Ozpolat, E. T., & Yıldırım, I. (2020). The effect of game-based learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09471-5
  16. Kirginas, S., & Gouscos, D. (2016a). Exploring the impact of free-form and structured digital games on the player experience of kindergarten and primary school students. In D. Russell, & J. Laffey (Ed.), Handbook of research on gaming trends in P-12 education (pp. 394-420). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9629-7.ch019
  17. Kirginas, S., & Gouscos, D. (2016b). Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure perceptions of freedom of choice in digital games. International Journal of Serious Games, 3(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v3i2.120
  18. Kirginas, S., & Gouscos, D. (2017). Exploring the impact of freeform gameplay on players’ experience: an experiment with maze games at varying levels of freedom of movement. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(4), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i4.175
  19. Labov, W. (2013). The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519632
  20. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). University of Washington Press.
  21. McCarthy, E., Tiu, M., & Li, L. (2018). Learning math with curious George and the odd squad: Transmedia in the classroom. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9361-4
  22. Mitgutsch, K. (2008). Digital play-based learning. A philosophical-pedagogical perspective on learning and playing in computer games. Journal for Information Technology Studies as Human Science 9(3), 18-36.
  23. Mojang, (2011). Minecraft [PC game]. Mojang.
  24. Ranalli, J. (2008). Learning English with the Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447859
  25. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
  26. Schneider, M. (2008). National assessment of educational progress. The nation’s report card: Writing 2007. http://nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/commissioner/remarks2008/4_3_2008.asp
  27. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press.
  28. Team Happy Shack. (2011). Robinson Crusoe: The Game [PC game]. July Game Jam.
  29. Warren, S. J. (2006). The impact of a multi-user virtual environment on teacher instructional time, voluntary student writing practice, and student writing achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
  30. Warren. D., Glor. R., Turelli. M. (2008). Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62(11), 2868-2883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x