Review Article

Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years

Oksana V. Vashetina 1 * , Tatyana Shoustikova 2 , Natalia A. Zaitseva 3 , Yelizaveta V. Chereshneva 4 , Mariia S. Pavlova 4 , Zhanna M. Sizova 4 , Andrey V. Suslov 4 5
More Detail
1 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA2 Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, RUSSIA3 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA4 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA5 National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, RUSSIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), October 2026, ep684, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183
Published: 20 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   134 Views   68 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Educational technology (ET) plays an important role in improving student learning experiences, yet no prior study has systematically examined research trends among its most influential publications. This bibliometric study analyzed the 100 most-cited articles on ET published between 2005 and 2024, drawn from the Scopus database. Results show that articles published in 2020 received the highest total citations, with the USA, Taiwan, and Australia as the most productive countries and Computers and Education as the leading source journal. Analysis of the top 20 most-cited articles identified three themes: interactive learning environments, the role of digital technologies, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ET use. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further revealed four emerging research clusters spanning technology acceptance, learning-process monitoring, distance-learning pedagogy, and post-pandemic online/blended learning models. Co-citation analysis showed that researchers most frequently drew on studies addressing individual learner characteristics and technology acceptance frameworks (TAM/UTAUT). These findings offer researchers and practitioners a consolidated overview of the field’s most impactful contributions and emerging directions.
Keywords: educational technology, most cited studies, bibliometric analysis, 100 most cited, TAM, UTAUT

CITATION (APA)

Vashetina, O. V., Shoustikova, T., Zaitseva, N. A., Chereshneva, Y. V., Pavlova, M. S., Sizova, Z. M., & Suslov, A. V. (2026). Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

REFERENCES

  1. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  2. Ali, N. (2024). An investigation into the impact of educational technology on the teaching-learning process in higher education. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2024.805022
  3. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  4. Balaji, D., & Sahija, D. (2022). Effectiveness of ICT in enhancing learning procedure in higher education. TTAICTE, 1(2), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.36647/ttaicte/01.02.a004
  5. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2011). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
  7. Chen, C. C., Wang, N. C., Tang, K. Y., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7695
  8. Chen, H., Sun, D., Yang, Y., Looi, C., & Jia, F. (2023). Detecting and visualizing research trends of blended learning: A bibliometric analysis of studies from 2013-2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(10), Article em2336. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13592
  9. Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 512-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13205
  10. Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G., & Hao, T. (2019). Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 563-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00149-1
  11. Cheng, Y., Huang, C., & Hsu, L. C. (2021). Research trends in educational technology. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.293191
  12. Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2012). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
  13. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
  14. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  15. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2009). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
  16. Darmawansah, D. (2021). A Bibliometric Mapping of educational technology in Indonesia (2011-2020). Indonesian Scholars Scientific Summit Taiwan Proceeding, 3, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.52162/3.2021107
  17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  18. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  19. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  20. Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
  21. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  22. Fu, F., Su, R., & Yu, S. (2008). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
  23. Görgülü, D. (2025). Higher education in Türkiye in the shadow of chaos: A study on students from the faculty of education in times of crisis. Educational Point, 2(1), Article e119. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16452
  24. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030009022
  25. Hossein-Mohand, H., Hossein-Mohand, H., Albanese, V., & Del Carmen Olmos Gómez, M. (2025). AI in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis of global trends and collaborations (2020-2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(2), Article em2576. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15915
  26. Ishmuradova, I. I., Chistyakov, A. A., Chudnovskiy, A. D., Grib, E. V., Kondrashev, S. V., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2024). A cross-database bibliometrics analysis of blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep508. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14478
  27. Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2017). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515-1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
  28. Jiménez, C. R., Prieto, M. S., & García, S. A. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 9(3), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169
  29. Kilavuz, F. (2024). Exploring research trends in the implementation of the flipped classroom model in educational research: A review of literature. Pedagogical Research, 9(3), Article em0216. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14730
  30. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2010). E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56(3), 885-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001
  31. Korsah, D. P., Wireko-Ampem, J. K., & Forson, I. (2026). Extending the UTAUT model with service quality to assess Moodle LMS acceptance in Ghanaian colleges of education. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 2(1), Article e107. https://doi.org/10.71176/interedtech/17900
  32. Kuzu, Y., & Kuzu, O. (2022). Eğitsel oyunlar ie ilgili yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik bir analizi [A bibliometric analysis of studies on educational games]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(3), 724-740. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1102403
  33. Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
  34. Lee, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
  35. Lee, M. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
  36. Liaw, S. (2007). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
  37. Liaw, S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2006). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
  38. Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Sierra-Sánchez, V. (2020). The technological challenge facing higher education professors: Perceptions of ICT tools for developing 21st century skills. Sustainability, 12(13), Article 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135339
  39. Mahdavinasab, Y., & Haseli, D. (2025). Conceptual structure and trend topics of the education and information technologies journal: A bibliometrics analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 23(1), 211-230.
  40. Masveta, D. (2026). Using EdTech to reach the unreached: Innovative approaches to non-formal education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point, 3(1), Article e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
  41. Mena-Guacas, A. F., Rodríguez, J. A. U., Trujillo, D. M. S., Gómez-Galán, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article ep428. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13123
  42. Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, Article 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
  43. Mohsen, M., Althebi, S., Bensalem, E., & Alsherif, N. (2025). A decade of highly cited articles in educational technology research: Emerging trends, dominant themes, and future directions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 38, 310-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09435-7
  44. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
  45. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
  46. Olszewski, B., & Crompton, H. (2020). Educational technology conditions to support the development of digital age skills. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103849
  47. Özel, M. (2024). An analysis of research trends on socio-scientific issues in science education over two decades from 2004 to 2023. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/jmste.1.1.69
  48. Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
  49. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  50. Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217.
  51. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  52. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  53. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  54. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  55. Selim, H. M. (2005). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
  56. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  57. Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
  58. Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  59. Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
  60. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  61. Venkatesh, N., Morris, N., Davis, N., & Davis, N. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  62. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  63. Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309. https://doi.org/10.5465/257034
  64. Wu, H., Lee, S. W., Chang, H., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  65. Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012