Research Article

Exploring Preservice STEM Teachers’ Smartphone Addiction

Alfiya R. Masalimova 1 * , Elmira R. Khairullina 2 , Natalya I. Lapidus 3 , Natalia A. Orekhovskaya 4 , Marina R. Zheltukhina 5 , Ekaterina A. Baranova 6
More Detail
1 Department of Pedagogy of Higher Education, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA2 Faculty of Design and Software Engineering, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, RUSSIA3 Department of Medical and Social Assessment, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA4 Department of Humanities, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA5 Institute of Foreign Languages, Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University, Volgograd, Russia6 Faculty of Communicative Management, Russian State Social University, Moscow, RUSSIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), July 2022, ep371, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11916
Published: 24 March 2022
OPEN ACCESS   2179 Views   1293 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Smartphones are mobile technology cutting-edge. Daily, the amount of time spent on a phone increases. Excessive smartphone use and addiction have developed into big social issues. Addiction to smartphones is a negative and pathological concept that is assessed by a set of subjective and behavioral symptoms including fixation, loss of control, and withdrawal symptoms. Teachers in STEM fields have a higher degree of involvement with their students in the use of digital tools. STEM teacher candidates must demonstrate an understanding of how to incorporate technology successfully into classroom activities. Determine the incidence of smartphone addiction among prospective STEM educators to justify future awareness training. The association between pre-service STEM instructors’ smartphone addiction was studied. The research included 242 persons, 180 of whom were females and 62 males. The SAI is self-administered and scored independently for each dimension. Data is analyzed using machine learning techniques. Cluster analysis is used to analyze the inventory’s dimensions. The k-means technique is used for cluster analysis. The library’s SHAP (SHapley additive explanations) approach was used to evaluate the classification result and assess the impact of attributes on the classification result. According to the findings, the highest level was judged to be 30 participants. Approximately 3%4 participants are deemed moderate (high and very high). Also, 48 people are at a low level. In terms of the overall group, it is modest. Being in the lowest cluster is linked to 100+ uses, whereas being in the highest cluster is linked to 6-10 uses. The exact degree of smartphone use linked to smartphone addiction is unknown. Females inversely correlate with the highest and lowest clusters.

CITATION (APA)

Masalimova, A. R., Khairullina, E. R., Lapidus, N. I., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Zheltukhina, M. R., & Baranova, E. A. (2022). Exploring Preservice STEM Teachers’ Smartphone Addiction. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), ep371. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11916

REFERENCES

  1. Abubakar Ismaila, A., Kadage Tukur, A., & Amoson Gambari, I. (2019). Ease and level of use of smartphone for learning amongst pre-service teachers colleges of education in North-West, Nigeria. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 1(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v1i1.60
  2. Alkhunaizan, A. S. (2019). An empirical study on smartphone addiction of the university students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(2), 184-195. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i12.11120
  3. Arnavut, A., Nuri, C., & Direktor, C. (2018). Examination of the relationship between phone usage and smartphone addiction based on certain variables. Anales de Psicologia [Annals of Psychology], 34(3), 446-450. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.321351
  4. ASAM. (2019). ASAM definition of addiction. American Society of Addiction Medicine. https://www.asam.org/Quality-Science/definition-of-addiction
  5. Awofala, A. O. (2020). Investigating nomophobia as a predictor of smartphone addiction among Nigerian pre-service mathematics teachers. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 4(2), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v4i2.40021
  6. Bauer, M., Glenn, T., Geddes, J., Gitlin, M., Grof, P., Kessing, L. V., Monteith, S., Faurholt-Jepsen, M., Severus, E., & Whybrow, P. C. (2020). Smartphones in mental health: A critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0164-x
  7. Bayanova, A. R., Chistyakov, A. A., Timofeeva, M. O., Nasonkin, V. V., Shulga, T. I., & Vasyukov, V. F. (2022). Psychometric properties of smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI) in Russian context. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep342. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11478
  8. Caliskan, S., Guney, Z., Sakhieva, R. G., Vasbieva, D. G., & Zaitseva, N. A. (2019). Teachers’ views on the availability of Web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(22), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i22.11752
  9. Carbonell, X., Chamarro, A., Oberst, U., Rodrigo, B., & Prades, M. (2018). Problematic use of the internet and smartphones in university students: 2006-2017. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030475
  10. Celik, O. T., & Konan, N. (2019). The mediator role of interaction anxiety in the relationship between social support perception and smartphone addiction. Journal of Education and Future, 15, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.397445
  11. Ching, S. M., Yee, A., Ramachandran, V., Lim, S. M. S., Sulaiman, W. A. W., Foo, Y. L., & Hoo, F. K. (2015). Validation of a Malay version of the smartphone addiction scale among medical students in Malaysia. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139337
  12. Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
  13. Demirci, K., Akgonul, M., & Akpinar, A. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.010
  14. Ekaterina, S., Dmitry, I., Muratova, A., Islam, R., Mitrofanova, E., & Ignatov, D. I. (2019). Searching for interpretable demographic patterns. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97305/1/paper2.pdf
  15. Elhai, J. D., Dvorak, R. D., Levine, J. C., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030
  16. Felisoni, D. D., & Godoi, A. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers and Education, 117, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.006
  17. Gecgel, H. (2020). Investigation of smartphone addiction levels of Turkish pre-service teachers with regards to various variables. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1415-1442. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803828
  18. Gezgin, D. M. (2018). Understanding patterns for smartphone addiction: Age, sleep duration, social network use and fear of missing out. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v13i2.2938
  19. Gokcearslan, S., & Oberst, U. (2018). stress and social support among university students: A path analysis. Stress and Health, 33(5), 624-630.
  20. Harris, B., Regan, T., Schueler, J., & Fields, S. A. (2020). Problematic mobile phone and smartphone use scales: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00672
  21. Haug, S., Paz Castro, R., Kwon, M., Filler, A., Kowatsch, T., & Schaub, M. P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.037
  22. Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
  23. Konan, N., Durmus, E., Turkoglu, D., & Bakir, A. A. (2018). How is smartphone addiction related to interaction anxiety of prospective teachers? Education Sciences, 8(4), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040186
  24. Kwon, M., Kim, D. J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
  25. Lee, E. B. (2015). Too much information: Heavy smartphone and Facebook utilization by African American young adults. Journal of Black Studies, 46(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934714557034
  26. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049
  27. Lin, Y. H., Chang, L. R., Lee, Y. H., Tseng, H. W., Kuo, T. B. J., & Chen, S. H. (2014). Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI). PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone.0098312
  28. Lin, Y. H., Chiang, C. L., Lin, P. H., Chang, L. R., Ko, C. H., Lee, Y. H., & Lin, S. H. (2016). Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS ONE, 11(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163010
  29. Lin, Y. H., Lin, Y. C., Lee, Y. H., Lin, P. H., Lin, S. H., Chang, L. R., Tseng, H. W., Yen, L. Y., Yang, C. C. H., & Kuo, T. B. J. (2015). Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 65, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.003
  30. Matar Boumosleh, J., & Jaalouk, D. (2017). Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students-A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0182239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182239
  31. Mella-Norambuena, J., Cobo-Rendon, R., Lobos, K., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Maldonado-Trapp, A. (2021). Smartphone use among undergraduate stem students during COVID-19: An opportunity for higher education? Education Sciences, 11(8), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080417
  32. Mok, J.-Y., Choi, S.-W., Kim3, D.-J., & Choi, J.-S. (2014). Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment dovepress latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Journal of Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 10, 817-828. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S59293
  33. Panova, T., & Carbonell, X. (2018). Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2), 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.49
  34. Randler, C., Wolfgang, L., Matt, K., Demirhan, E., Horzum, M. B., & Beşoluk, S. (2016). Smartphone addiction proneness in relation to sleep and morningness-eveningness in German adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(3), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.056
  35. Razumovskaya, M., Zaitseva, N. A., Larionova, A. A., Chudnovskiy, A. D., & Breusova, E. A. (2018). Prospects for applying various forms of organizational integration to improve the quality of education. Astra Salvensis, 6(2), 348.
  36. Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Navas-Parejo, M. R., Marín-Marín, J. A., & Gómez-García, G. (2020). Use of Instagram by pre-service teacher education: Smartphone habits and dependency factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114097
  37. Scikit-Learn. (2021). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python—Scikit-learn 1.0.1 documentation. https://scikitlearn.org/stable/
  38. Shan, Z., Deng, G., Li, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2013). Correlational analysis of neck/shoulder pain and low back pain with the use of digital products, physical activity and psychological status among adolescents in Shanghai. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078109
  39. Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., & Kundaje, A. (2017). Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 4844-4866).
  40. Soomro, K. A., Zai, S. A. Y., Nasrullah, & Hina, Q. A. (2019). Investigating the impact of university students’ smartphone addiction on their satisfaction with classroom connectedness. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3523-3535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09947-7
  41. Syakur, M. A., Khotimah, B. K., Rochman, E. M. S., & Satoto, B. D. (2018). Integration k-means clustering method and elbow method for identification of the best customer profile cluster. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 336(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012017
  42. Tugun, V., Bayanova, A. R., Erdyneeva, K. G., Mashkin, N. A., Sakhipova, Z. M., & Zasova, L. V. (2020). The opinions of technology supported education of university students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(23), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i23.18779
  43. Vezzoli, M., Colombo, A., Marano, A., Zoccatelli, G., & Zogmaister, C. (2021). Test for mobile phone dependence: Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01449-5
  44. XGBoost Developers. (2021). XGBoost documentation—XGBoost 1.5.1 documentation. https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/stable/#
  45. Yuan, C., & Yang, H. (2019). Research on k-value selection method of k-means clustering algorithm. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 2(2), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2020016