Review Article

Empowering College Students to Decrease Digital Distraction Through the Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies

Chih-Hsuan Wang 1 * , Jill D. Salisbury-Glennon 1 , Yan Dai 1 , Sangah Lee 1 , Jianwei Dong 1
More Detail
1 Department of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology, College of Education, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), October 2022, ep388, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12456
Published: 13 September 2022
OPEN ACCESS   4502 Views   3917 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Most college students have grown up using technology and consequently, they are proficient with its many uses and applications. The use of this technology provides many benefits to college students’ learning, both in and out of the classroom. However, despite the numerous benefits of technology, these digital activities can also lead to much digital distraction. Digital distractions may include Internet surfing, watching movies, checking texts, reading, and sending emails, and perusing social media. These digital distractions often result in limited attention and engagement during class, as well as less learning and academic achievement overall. Digital distraction can result from such factors as anxiety and depression, motivational variables, the need to keep up and the fear of missing out, emotional numbing and procrastination as well as an overreliance on multitasking. It is suggested here that the use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies may be effective in assisting college students in avoiding digital distractions, both in and out of the classroom. SRL strategies include forethought, planning, activation; monitoring, control and reflection on the learner’s cognition, motivation/affect, and behavior. Through the use of these SRL strategies, college students may be taught to decrease digital distractions and, thus, experience higher levels of learning and academic performance.
Keywords: digital distraction, self-regulation, college students, academic achievement

CITATION (APA)

Wang, C.-H., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., Dai, Y., Lee, S., & Dong, J. (2022). Empowering College Students to Decrease Digital Distraction Through the Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep388. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12456

REFERENCES

  1. Aagaard, J. (2019). Multitasking as distraction: A conceptual analysis of media multitasking research. Theory & Psychology, 29(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318815766
  2. Aaron, L. S., & Lipton, T. (2018). Digital distraction: Shedding light on the 21st-century college classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517736876
  3. Agrawal, P., Sahana, H. S., & De’, R. (2017). Digital distraction. In R. Baguma, R. De’, & T. Janowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 191-194). https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047328
  4. Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
  5. Alshalawi, A., S. (2022). Social media usage intensity and academic performance among undergraduate students in Saudi Arabia. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), ep361. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11711
  6. Anthonysamy, L., Choo, K. A., & Hin, H. S. (2020, May). Self-regulation strategic framework for minimizing distraction in digital society. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(5), 052027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052027
  7. Ariani, D. (2016). Why do I study? The mediating effect of motivation and self-regulation on student performance. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2016.329
  8. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 89-195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3
  9. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
  11. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
  12. Becker, M. W., Alzahabi, R., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Media multitasking is associated with symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 132-135. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0291
  13. Brady, A. C., Kim, Y. E., & Cutshall, J. (2021). The what, why, and how of distractions from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(2), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1867671
  14. Brady, A. C., Kim, Y. E., & von Spiegel, J. (2022). Learning in the face of digital distractions: Empowering students to practice self-regulated learning. In A. E. Flanigan, & J. H. Y. Kim (Eds.), Digital distractions in the college classroom (pp. 120-142). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9243-4.ch006
  15. Cades, D. M., Boehm Davis, D. A., Trafton, J. G., & Monk, C. A. (2007). Does the difficulty of an interruption affect our ability to resume? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 51(4), 234-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120705100419
  16. Cárdenas-Robledo, L. A., & Peña-Ayala, A. (2019). A holistic self-regulated learning model: A proposal and application in ubiquitous-learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 123, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.007
  17. Chaklader, A., & Bohlander, R. W. (2009, March). The effects of text messaging on attention [Paper Presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
  18. Chan, C. K., So, W. K., & Fong, D. Y. (2009). Hong Kong baccalaureate nursing students’ stress and their coping strategies in clinical practice.  Journal of Professional Nursing, 25(5), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.018
  19. Chellappan, S., & Kotikalapudi, R. (2012). How depressive surf the web. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/opinion/sunday/how-depressed-people-use-the-internet.html
  20. Chen, L., Nath, R., & Insley, R. (2014). Determinants of digital distraction: A cross-cultural investigation of users in Africa, China and the U.S. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 23(3), 145-171. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim/vol23/iss3/8
  21. Cole, C. (2013). Concepts, propositions, models, and theories in information behavior research. In Beheshti, J., & Large, A. (Eds), The information behavior of a new generation: Children and teens in the 21st century (pp.1-22). Scarecrow Press.
  22. Davis, R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(4), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493102760275581
  23. Demirbilek, M., & Talan, T. (2018). The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721382
  24. Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
  25. Flanigan, A. E., & Babchuk, W. (2020). Digital distraction in the classroom: Exploring instructor perceptions and reactions. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 352-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1724937
  26. Flanigan, A. E., & Titsworth, S. (2020). The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning. Instructional Science, 48(5), 495-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09517-2
  27. Galla, B. M., Shulman, E. P., Plummer, B. D., Gardner, M., Hutt, S. J., Goyer, J. P., D’Mello, S. K., Finn, A. S., & Duckworth, A. L. (2019). Why high school grades are better predictors of on-time college graduation than are admissions test scores: The roles of self-regulation and cognitive ability. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2077-2115. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219843292
  28. Garcia-Santillan, A. & Espinosa-Ramos, E. (2021). Addiction to the smartphone in high school students: How it’s in daily life? Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep296. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9609
  29. Gerow, J. E., Galluch, P. S., & Thatcher, J. B. (2010). To slack or not to slack: Internet usage in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(3), 5-24. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol11/iss3/2/
  30. Goundar, S. (2014). The distraction of technology in the classroom. Journal of Education & Human Development, 3(1), 211-229. https://www.academia.edu/8478150/The_Distraction_of_Technology_in_the_Classroom?auto=citations&from=cover_page
  31. Hadwin, A., Jarvela, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk, & J. A. Green (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and academic performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
  32. Han, S., & Yi, Y. J. (2019). How does the smartphone usage of college students affect academic performance? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12306
  33. Herman, R. L. (2017). Letter from the editor-in-chief: Digital distractions. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-017-0578-z
  34. Herron, J. (2010). Implementation of technology in an elementary mathematics lesson: The experiences of preservice teachers at one university. SRATE Journal, 19(1), 22-29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ948684.pdf
  35. Hoyle, R. H., & Dent, A. L. (2018). Developmental trajectories of skills and abilities relevant for self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-4
  36. Hromalik, C. D., & Koszalka, T. A. (2018). Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes. Distance Education, 39(4), 528-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520044
  37. Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81-91. https://www.academia.edu/6669794/Criteria_Strategies_and_Research_Issues_of_Context_Aware_Ubiquitous_Learning?auto=citations&from=cover_page
  38. Jenson, J. D. (2011). Promoting self-regulation and critical reflection through writing students’ use of electronic portfolio. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 49-60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107586.pdf
  39. Kay, R. H. (2008). Exploring gender differences in computer-related behavior: Past, present, future. In T. T. Kidd, & I. Chen, (Eds.), Social information technology: Connecting society and cultural issues (pp. 12-30). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-774-4.ch002
  40. Kim, I., Kim, R., Kim, H., Kim, D., Han, K., Lee, P. H., Mark, G., & Lee, U. (2019). Understanding smartphone usage in college classrooms: A long-term measurement study. Computers & Education, 141, 103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103611
  41. Kraushaar, J. M., & Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 241-252. http://jise.org/Volume21/n2/JISEv21n2p241.pdf
  42. Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1038727
  43. Leysens, J.-L., le Roux, D., & Parry, D. (2016). Can I have your attention, please? An empirical investigation of media multitasking during university lectures. In F. B. Blauw (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (Article 21). https://doi.org/10.1145/2987491.2987498
  44. Li, S., & Zheng, J. (2018). The relationship between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in one-to-one computing environment: the mediated role of task values. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2
  45. Liu, Z. (2021). Reading in the age of digital distraction. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2021-0130
  46. Lukacs, A. (2021). Predictors of severe problematic Internet use in adolescent students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep315. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10989
  47. McGloin, R., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Christensen, J. L. (2017). The impact of goal achievement orientation on student technology usage in the classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 240-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9134-4
  48. McGraw Hill Education Digital Study Trends Survey. (2017). 2017 digital study trends survey. McGraw Hill Education.
  49. McGraw Hill Education Digital Study Trends Survey. (2021). 2021 digital study trends survey. McGraw Hill Education.
  50. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2) 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343
  51. Moran, K. (2016). Millennials as digital natives: Myths and realities. Nielson Norman Group.
  52. Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution. Columbia University Press.
  53. Ottenhoff, J. (2011). Learning how to learn: Metacognition in liberal education. Liberal Education, 97, 28-33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ962013
  54. Palalas, A., & Wark, N. (2020). The relationship between mobile learning and self-regulated learning: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5650
  55. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  56. Parry, D. A., & le Roux, D. B. (2018). Off-task media use in lectures: Towards a theory of determinants. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association (pp. 49-64). Springer. https:///doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_4
  57. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
  58. Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002
  59. Reyna, J., Hanham, J., Vlachopoulos, P., & Meier, P. (2019). A systematic approach to designing, implementing, and evaluating learner-generated digital media (LGDM) assignments and its effect on self-regulation in tertiary science education. Research in Science Education, 51, 1501-1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09885-x
  60. Rosen, L. D., Carrier, M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001
  61. Ryan, M. (2022). Digital trend report. McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/explore/studytrends.html
  62. Samson, P. J. (2010). Deliberate engagement of laptops in large lecture classes to improve attentiveness and engagement. Computers in Education, 20(2), 22-37. https://coed.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/3-Deliberate-Engagement-of-Laptops-In-Large-Lecture-Classes-to-Improve-Attentiveness-and-Engagement.pdf
  63. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson J. M. (2013). Who multitasks and why? Multitasking ability, perceived multitasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402
  64. Scholz, R., Bartelsman, E., Diefenbach, S., Franke, L., Grunwald, A., Helbing, D., Hill, R., Hilty, L., Höjer, M., Klauser, S., Montag, C., Parycek, P., Prote, J. P., Renn, O., Reichel, A., Schuh, G., Steiner, G., & Pereira, G. V. (2018). Unintended side effects of the digital transition: European scientists’ messages from a proposition-based expert round table. Sustainability, 10(6), 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062001
  65. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  66. Seemiller, C. (2017). Curbing digital distractions in the classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(3), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6197
  67. Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Dew, M. A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., & Primack, B. A. (2018). Social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms: A cluster analysis. American Journal of Health Behavior, 42(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.42.2.11
  68. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  69. Taneja, A., Fiore, V., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers & Education, 82, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.009
  70. Tesch, F., Coelho, D., & Drozdenko, R. (2011). We have met the enemy and he is us: Relative potencies of classroom distractions. Elm Street Press, 3(2), 13-19. http://www.beijournal.com/images/V3N2_text.pdf
  71. Tindell, D. R., & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.604802
  72. Vilkova, K., & Shcheglova, I. (2021). Deconstructing self-regulated learning in MOOCs: In search of help-seeking mechanisms. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10244-x
  73. Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. B. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
  74. Werner, N. E., Cades, D. M., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Chang, J., Kahn, H., & Thi, G. (2011). What makes us resilient to interruptions? Understanding the role of individual differences in resumption. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551062
  75. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Grasser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602350-19
  76. Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2019). The current status of students’ note-taking: Why and how do students take notes? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.04.002
  77. Wong, J., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Examining the use of prompts to facilitate self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106596
  78. Wu, J. Y., & Cheng, T. (2019). Who is better adapted in learning online within the personal learning environment? Relating gender differences in cognitive attention networks to digital distraction. Computers & Education, 128, 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.016
  79. Wu, J. Y., & Xie, C. (2018). Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.008
  80. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
  81. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_1
  82. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  83. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614