Research Article

Distance Lectures in University Studies: Advantages, Disadvantages, Improvement

Vincentas Lamanauskas 1 * , Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė 2
More Detail
1 Vilnius University Šiauliai Academy, Lithuania2 Vilnius University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Lithuania* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), July 2021, ep309, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10887
OPEN ACCESS   3440 Views   1571 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Distance learning is not a new subject in university study practice. It is clear that a significant number of universities practiced this way of learning before the pandemic. In the case of distance learning, the emphasis is always not so much on the means used for teaching and learning, as on the very fact of the physical separation of the lecturer and the student. There is a reasonable concern about the quality of studies, their efficiency, the quality of the qualifications acquired by future specialists, etc. The new context creates the need to analyse and assess the distance learning situation that arose during the pandemic.
In January-February 2021, a qualitative study was conducted, in which 158 students from three Lithuanian universities participated. Most of the respondents were students of social and humanitarian study programmes. Qualitative data obtained on the basis of open-ended questions were analysed using the method of quantitative content analysis, i.e., semantic subcategories and categories according to four main variables were distinguished: advantages of distance lectures, disadvantages of distance lectures, and distance lecture improvement.
It has been established that the main advantages are the convenience of studying and the flexibility of the study process. Meanwhile, the most obvious shortcomings are deterioration of physical and mental health and non-realisation of social needs, deterioration of the quality of academic activities. Improving the design of lectures and improving their planning and organisation are considered the key areas of improvement.
Keywords: content analysis, distance learning, distance lectures, qualitative research, university students

CITATION (APA)

Lamanauskas, V., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2021). Distance Lectures in University Studies: Advantages, Disadvantages, Improvement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep309. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10887

REFERENCES

  1. Atadjanov, H. (2020). Students’ motivation and independent work of students in an online and blended learning environment. Central Asian Problems of Modern Science and Education, 1, Article 8.
  2. Ballova Mikuškova, E., & Verešova, M. (2020). Distance education during COVID-19: The perspective of Slovak teachers. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(6), 884-906. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.884
  3. Berkova, K., Boruvkova, J., Frendlovska, D., Krpalek, P., & Melas, D. (2020). Learning style preferences of university and college students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 486-499. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.486
  4. Bitinas, B. (2002). Pedagoginės diagnostikos pagrindai [Basics of pedagogical diagnostics]. Vilniaus pedagoginio universiteto leidykla.
  5. Borisova, O. V., Vasbieva, D. G., Malykh, N. I., Vasnev, S. A., & Bírová, J. (2016). Problem of using innovative teaching methods for distance learning students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1175-1184.
  6. Brown, C. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. ezTalks. https://www.eztalks.com/elearning/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-distance-learning.html
  7. Brown, M., Hughes, H., Keppell, M., Hard, N., & Smith, L. (2015). Stories from students in their first semester of distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.1647
  8. Čiarnienė, R., Vienažindienė, M., & Kumpikaitė, V. (2012). Informacinių technologijų taikymas studijų procese: palyginamoji analizė [Application of information technologies in the study process: Comparative analysis]. Economics and Management, 17(4), 1552-1558. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.4.3028
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. Taylor & Francis Group, RoutledgeFalmer.
  10. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
  11. Dzakiria, H., Razak, A. A., & Mohamed, A. H. (2004). Improving distance courses: Understanding teacher trainees and their learning styles for the design of teacher training courses and materials at a distance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 5(1), 2-17. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/16931/176752
  12. Klapproth, F., Federkeil, L., Heinschke, F., & Jungmann, T. (2020). Teachers’ experiences of stress and their coping strategies during COVID-19 induced distance teaching. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020062805
  13. Konariovas, A. (2014). Mokymosi proceso veiksmingumo didinimas taikant nuotolinio mokymo technologijas [Development the effectiveness of the learning process applying the technologies of distance learning] (Master’s Thesis). Kauno Technologijos Universitetas. https://epubl.ktu.edu/object/elaba:2174781/
  14. Lamanauskas, V. (2013). Information communication technologies, education quality and challenges for future. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 56, 5-7. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/849
  15. Lamanauskas, V., Iordache, D. D., & Pribeanu, C. (2017). Social influence and dependence in the Facebook use by Romanian and Lithuanian university students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(4), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/17.75.354
  16. Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern distance learning technologies in higher education: Introduction problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), Article em1578. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92284
  17. Louis-Jean, J., & Cenat, K. (2020). Beyond the face-to-face learning: A contextual analysis. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0077. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8466
  18. Manea, V. I., Macavei, T., & Pribeanu, C. (2021). Perceived benefits of online lectures during the pandemic: A case study in engineering education. Pro Edu. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(4), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.26520/peijes.2021.4.3.35-41
  19. Melnikovas, A. (2017). Nuotolinio mokymo funkcijų genezė technologinio ir edukacinio virsmo paradigmų kontekstuose [The genesis of distance education functions within the contextual conversion of technological and educational paradigms]. Tiltai, 1, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.15181/tbb.v76i1.1517
  20. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Sage Pub.
  22. Miščenko, O. (2014). Dėstytojo esminė svarba dėstant nuotoliniu būdu ir progresyvusis mokymo metodas, naudojant virtualiąją mokymo aplinką [The importance of a teacher in a distance education and the progressive methods of teaching in a virtual learning environment]. SANTALKA: Filologija, Edukologija / COACTIVITY: Philology, Educology, 22(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3846/cpe.2014.010
  23. Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denizin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S., Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed). Sage.
  24. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and reommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID-19-S4), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID-19-S4.2785
  25. Navickienė, V., & Vainorytė, B. (2015). Lietuvos kolegijų nuotolinių studijų e. mokymosi formų ir priemonių analizė [Analysis of E-learning forms and aids of distance studies in Lithuanian colleges]. Pedagogika, 120, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.039
  26. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  27. Nsengimana, T., Bazimaziki, G., Nyirahabimana, A., Mushimiyimana, J. B., Mutarutinya, V., Mugabo, L. R., & Nsengimana, V. (2021). Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic in Rwanda: Experience of postgraduate students on language of instruction, mathematics and science education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1), ep21009. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/10788
  28. Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, 29, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661
  29. Owens, J., Hardcastle, L., & Richardson, B. (2009). Learning from a distance: The experience of remote students. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 53-74. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30021696
  30. Pratt, K. (2015). Supporting distance learners: Making practice more effective. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 19(1), 12-26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068330.pdf
  31. Qureshi, E., Morton, L. L., & Antosz, E. (2002). An interesting profile-university students who take distance education courses show weaker motivation than on-campus students. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter54/Quershi54.htm
  32. Rutkauskienė D., & Pociūtė E. (2006). Virtualaus mokymosi modeliai [Virtual learning models]. KTU.
  33. Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.1.80
  34. Samašonok, K., & Žonych, A. (2020). Nuotolinės studijos: neišvengiamybė, iššūkiai ir tobulinimo galimybės [Distance study: Inevitability, challenges and opportunities for improvement]. Science & Processes of Education / Mokslas ir Edukaciniai Procesai, 2, 23-35.
  35. Stankūnienė, R. (2012). Nuotolinės paskaitos kūrimas panaudojant įrankį “Lesson” Moodle sistemoje [Lectures using distance building tool to “Lesson” Moodle]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62656593.pdf
  36. Tankelevičienė, L., Turskienė, S. (2003). Moksleivių ir studentų nuostatų į nuotolines studijas tyrimas [Research on attitudes of pupils and students towards distance learning]. Pedagogika, 69, 223-229.
  37. Torres-Gastelu, C. A. (2021). Late adoption of preventive measures of online privacy in Mexican and Colombian university students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(1), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.162
  38. Tuychieva, S. M., Nematova, G. A. & Arzikulov, M. U. (2020). Innovative methods for distance learning. Central Asian Journal of Education, 5(2), Article 8. https://uzjournals.edu.uz/cjedu/vol5/iss2/8
  39. Vilkonis, R., Turskienė, S., & Barabanova, I. (2014). Informacinių ir komunikacinių technologijų panaudojimo mokantis savarankiškai privalumai: universiteto studentų ir gimnazijos mokinių nuomonių lyginamoji analizė [Benefits of the use of ICT for autonomous learning: Comparative analysis of university and high school students’ opinion]. Jaunųjų mokslininkų darbai, 2(42), 75-82. https://etalpykla.lituanistikadb.lt/object/LT-LDB-0001:J.04~2014~1486561312123/
  40. Wu, P., Low, S.-P., Liu, J.-Y., Pienaar, J., & Xia, B. (2015). Critical success factors in distance learning construction programs at Central Queensland University: Students` perspective. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(1), Article 0000217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000217
  41. Yildırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (8th Edition) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
  42. Zaborova, E. N., Glazkova, I. G., & Markova, T. L. (2017). Distance learning: Students’ perspective. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2, 131-139.