Research Article

Designing the video-based learning environments using workflow and scaffolding to enhance self-instructional video production ability of pre-service teacher

Narin Nonthamand 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Educational Technology, School of Education, University of Phayao, Phayao, THAILAND* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), January 2024, ep492, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14102
Published: 05 January 2024
OPEN ACCESS   3937 Views   1708 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study aims to design a video-based learning environment using workflow and scaffolding to enhance self-instructional video production ability of pre-service teacher and to explore the impacts of the use of the designed video-based learning environment on learning. The methodology was divided into two main phases. In the first phase, a video-based learning environment was designed using workflow and scaffolding. In the second phase, the impacts of the use of the developed video-based learning environment on learning were investigated. The samples were 47 undergraduate students at the School of Education, University of Phayao. The results were, as follows: (a) The design draft of the developed video-based learning environment was appropriate, and the revision was made according to six criteria: (1) instructional media, (2) content, (3) learning activities, (4) communication devices, (5) learning management systems, and (6) screen design. The analysis of related studies and documents, the instructional video production process consisted of three steps: (1) design, (2) development, and (3) video delivery. (b) The comparison of scores on the instructional video production knowledge test revealed that the pre-service teachers’ average post-test score was higher than the average pre-test score with a statistically significant difference at the .05 level. The assessment of instructional videos, it was found that the pre-service teachers in the field of humanities obtained a higher score than those in the field of science. Male pre-service teachers received a higher score than female pre-service teachers. The average suit-ability score indicated the overall appropriateness of the developed video-based learning environment.
Keywords: video-based learning environment, workflow, scaffolding, instructional videos, self-instructional video production ability

CITATION (APA)

Nonthamand, N. (2024). Designing the video-based learning environments using workflow and scaffolding to enhance self-instructional video production ability of pre-service teacher. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), ep492. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14102

REFERENCES

  1. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  3. Barreto, D., Vasconcelos, L., & Orey, M. (2017). Motivation and learning engagement through playing math video games. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.2.1
  4. Carmichael, M., Reid, A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking and learning. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/hevideolearning.pdf
  5. Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2021). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian faculty of business and economics. Learning Environments Research, 25, 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2
  6. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  7. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  8. Donkin, R., Askew, E., & Stevenson, H. (2019). Video feedback and e-learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students. BMC Medical Education, 19, 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1745-1
  9. Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
  10. Eisner, M. (2021). 10 benefits and examples of a workflow process. https://www.processmaker.com/blog/10-benefits-and-examples-of-a-workflow-process/
  11. Friend, J., & Militello, M. (2015). Lights, camera, action: Advancing learning, research, and program evaluation through video production in educational leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(2), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775114561120
  12. Gaston, J. P., & Havard, B. (2019). The effects of collaborative video production on situational interest of elementary school students. TechTrends, 63(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0363-9
  13. Ghassemi, T., Shahroodi, A., Ebrahimzadeh, M. H., Mousavian, A., Movaffagh, J., & Moradi, A. (2018). Current concepts in scaffolding for bone tissue engineering. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 6(2), 90.
  14. Gorucu-Coskuner, H., Atik, E., & Taner, T. (2020). Comparison of live-video and video demonstration methods in clinical orthodontics education. Journal of Dental Education, 84(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.161
  15. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos [Paper presentation]. The 1st ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
  16. Hyysalo, J., Oivo, M., & Kuvaja, P. (2017). A design theory for cognitive workflow systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 27(01), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194017500061
  17. Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., & Veermans, M. (2019). The online learning process and scaffolding in student teachers’ personal learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 755-779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4
  18. Madariaga, L., Nussbaum, M., Gutiérrez, I., Barahona, C., & Meneses, A. (2021). Assessment of user experience in video-based learning environments: From design guidelines to final product. Computers & Education, 167, 104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104176
  19. Microtool. (2020). Workflows. Accomplish automatized efficiency and quality. https://www.microtool.de/en/knowledge-base/what-are-workflows/
  20. Nonthamand, N. (n. d.-a). A survey of problems of instructional video production of pre- service teacher in Thai higher education institutions. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/255420
  21. Nonthamand, N. (n. d.-b). Exploring the problems in instructional video production of pre-service teacher in school of education in University of Phayao. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssr/article/view/255420
  22. Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2010). Video production as an instructional strategy: Content learning and teacher practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 145-166.
  23. Othman, H. S., Zaibon, S. B., & Abidin, A. H. Z. (2022). The significance of edutainment concept in video-based learning in proposing the elements of educational music video for children’s learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(5), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i05.23711
  24. Petr, C., Belk, R., & Decrop, A. (2015). Videography in marketing research: Mixing art and science. Arts and the Market, 5(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/AM-01-2014-0002
  25. Rasi, P. M., & Poikela, S. (2016). A review of video triggers and video production in higher education and continuing education PBL settings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1609
  26. Shelton, C. C., Archambault, L. M., & Hale, A. E. (2017). Bringing digital storytelling to the elementary classroom: Video production for preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(2), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1276871
  27. Snelson, C. (2018). Video production in content-area pedagogy: A scoping study of the research literature. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1504788
  28. Sofyan, H., Us, T., Wakid, M., & Sulistyo, B. (2019). Developing micro-teaching video as learning media in automotive teacher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273, 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012059
  29. Sugathapala, R. D. U. P., & Chandrika, M. G. R. (2021). Student nurses’ knowledge acquisition on oral medication administration: comparison of lecture demonstration vs. video demonstration. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-20790/v4
  30. Taskin, Y., Hecking, T., Hoppe, H. U., Dimitrova, V., & Mitrovic, A. (2019). Characterizing comment types and levels of engagement in video-based learning as a basis for adaptive nudging. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_27
  31. Teo, Y. H., & Chai, C. S. (2009). Scaffolding online collaborative critiquing for educational video production. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 1(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2009.01.005
  32. The School in Rose Valley. (2019). The importance of an engaged learning environment. https://www.theschoolinrosevalley.org/engaged-learning-environment/
  33. Trabelsi, O., Gharbi, A., Souissi, M. A., Mezghanni, N., Bouchiba, M., & Mrayeh, M. (2021). Video modeling examples are effective tools for self-regulated learning in physical education: Students learn through repeated viewing, self-talk, and mental rehearsal. European Physical Education Review, 1356336X211046300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211046300
  34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
  36. Wang, J., Antonenko, P., & Dawson, K. (2020). Does visual attention to the instructor in online video affect learning and learner perceptions? An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 146, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103779
  37. Wang, X., Mayer, R. E., Zhou, P., & Lin, L. (2021). Benefits of interactive graphic organizers in online learning: Evidence for generative learning theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000606
  38. Watt, D. (2019). Video production in elementary teacher education as a critical digital literacy practice. Media and Communication, 7(2), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1967
  39. Winslett, G. (2014). What counts as educational video?: Working toward best practice alignment between video production approaches and outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.458
  40. Wood, L., & Olivier, T. (2011). Video production as a tool for raising educator awareness about collaborative teacher-parent partnerships. Educational Research, 53(4), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.625151
  41. Yan, Q. (2021). A video production method of micro-class combined with MOOC. Scientific Programming, 9925165. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9925165