Review Article

Building digital thinkers: A bibliometric analysis of computational thinking in children’s education for a sustainable future

Rita Wong Mee Mee 1 , Fatin Syamilah Che Yob 2 * , Lim Seong Pek 2 , Muhammad Fairuz Abd Rauf 3 , Yang Mingmei 4 , Ali Derahvasht 5
More Detail
1 Center for Language, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA2 Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts, INTI International University Malaysia, Nilai, MALAYSIA3 Faculty of Science and Defence Technology, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA4 School of Teacher Education, Pingdingsan University, Pingdinshan, Henan, CHINA5 Department of Global University Rankings, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRAN* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), July 2025, ep581, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16309
Published Online: 01 May 2025, Published: 01 July 2025
OPEN ACCESS   2706 Views   1664 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Computational thinking (CT) has emerged as a foundational skill for young learners, preparing them to navigate and contribute to an increasingly digital world. This bibliometric analysis utilizes 374 articles from the Web of Science database to explore the research landscape surrounding CT in children’s learning, focusing on its applications in language acquisition and cognitive development. Using co-citation and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies key thematic clusters, including CT’s integration into curricula, its role in enhancing critical thinking, and its social-emotional benefits. Findings suggest that CT holds significant potential in advancing equitable and inclusive education, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 by promoting accessible, high-quality learning experiences. Furthermore, CT’s interactive and problem-solving methodologies, such as coding exercises and robotics, actively engage children and encourage collaborative learning, directly supporting SDG 10 by reducing educational inequalities across diverse learning environments. This analysis not only highlights CT’s transformative impact on traditional educational practices but also reveals critical research gaps, particularly in the areas of inclusivity and accessibility. Future research is encouraged to investigate these areas further, advancing sustainable educational strategies that equip children with essential skills for a rapidly evolving technological landscape, thus fostering resilience, adaptability, and creativity among young learners.
Keywords: computational thinking, children’s education, digital literacy, cognitive development, creativity

CITATION (APA)

Mee, R. W. M., Yob, F. S. C., Pek, L. S., Rauf, M. F. A., Mingmei, Y., & Derahvasht, A. (2025). Building digital thinkers: A bibliometric analysis of computational thinking in children’s education for a sustainable future. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep581. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16309

REFERENCES

  1. Agbo, F., Yigzaw, S., Sanusi, I., Oyelere, S., & Mare, A. (2021). Examining theoretical and pedagogical foundations of computational thinking in the context of higher education. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637405
  2. Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, Article 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
  3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, Article 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
  4. Ballard, E., & Haroldson, R. (2021). Analysis of computational thinking in children’s literature for K-6 students: Literature as a non-programming unplugged resource. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 1487–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211004048
  5. Baroutsis, A., White, S. L., Ferdinands, E., Lambert, E., & Goldsmith, W. (2019). Computational thinking as a foundation for coding: Developing student engagement and learning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 24(2), 10–15.
  6. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
  7. Bers, M. U. (2017). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398945
  8. Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3
  9. Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
  10. Bhuyan, A., Sanguri, K., & Sharma, H. (2021). Improving the keyword co-occurrence analysis: An integrated semantic similarity approach. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 482–487). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673030
  11. Cano, S., Naranjo, J., Henao, C., Rusu, C., & Albiol-Pérez, S. (2020). Serious game as support for the development of computational thinking for children with hearing impairment. Applied Sciences, 11(1), Article 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010115
  12. Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Programming with the KIBO robotics kit in preschool classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1216251
  13. Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
  14. Flórez, F. B., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., & Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834–860. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317710096
  15. García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In D. Burgos, A. Tlili, A. Tabacco (Eds.), Radical solutions for education in a crisis context (pp. 85–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6
  16. Ghani, A., Griffiths, D., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Khalili, F., Khlaif, Z., & Burgos, D. (2022). Developing teaching practice in computational thinking in Palestine. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870090
  17. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
  18. Herbert, K., Anu, V., Sultana, K., Robila, S., Miller, J., Hagiwara, S., Goldstein, R., & Marlowe, T. (2022). Professional and capacity building in K-12 computer science education: A multi-faceted approach. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1384–1384). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545947.3576329
  19. Jacobs, D., Bobic, A., & Gütl, C. (2022). Comparison of network and readability properties with traditional bibliometric properties in the Journal of Universal Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062567
  20. Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
  21. Kleminski, R., Kazienko, P., & Kajdanowicz, T. (2020). Analysis of direct citation, co-citation and bibliographic coupling in scientific topic identification. Journal of Information Science, 48, 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520962775
  22. Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2
  23. Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  24. Maharani, S., Susanti, V., Andari, T., Krisdiana, I., & Astuti, I. (2023). Trend publication of computational thinking in mathematics education: Bibliometric review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i1.17654
  25. Nagumo, H., Oomori, Y., & Takemura, Y. (2021). Mutual improvement between teaching materials and assessment tools for K-12 programming education. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637257
  26. Papadakis, S. (2021). The impact of coding apps to support young children in computational thinking and computational fluency. A literature review. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.657895
  27. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education: A case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2016.077867
  28. Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
  29. Papert, S. A. (1990). Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
  30. Parsazadeh, N., Cheng, P., Wu, T., & Huang, Y. (2020). Integrating computational thinking concept into digital storytelling to improve learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120967315
  31. Rafiq, A., Triyono, M., Djatmiko, I., Wardani, R., & Köhler, T. (2023). Mapping the evolution of computational thinking in education: A bibliometrics analysis of Scopus database from 1987 to 2023. Informatics in Education, 22(4), 691–724. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.29
  32. Rehmat, A., Ehsan, H., & Cardella, M. (2020). Instructional strategies to promote computational thinking for young learners. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1693942
  33. Relkin, E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Factors influencing learning of computational thinking skills in young children. In Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/1687044
  34. Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2020). TechCheck: Development and validation of an unplugged assessment of computational thinking in early childhood education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09831-x
  35. Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers & Education, 169, Article 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
  36. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
  37. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
  38. Rottenhofer, M., Sabitzer, B., & Rankin, T. (2021). Developing computational thinking skills through modeling in language lessons. Open Education Studies, 3, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0138
  39. Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing unplugged and plugged activities to cultivate computational thinking: An exploratory study in early childhood education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w
  40. Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
  41. Tabesh, Y. (2017). Computational thinking: A 21st century skill. Olympiads in Informatics, 11(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.15388/IOI.2017.SPECIAL.10
  42. Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, Article 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
  43. Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and development in research on computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6499–6529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w
  44. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
  45. Wang, X. C., Choi, Y., Benson, K., Eggleston, C., & Weber, D. (2021). Teacher’s role in fostering preschoolers’ computational thinking: An exploratory case study. Early Education and Development, 32, 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1759012
  46. Weintrop, D., Rutstein, D., Bienkowski, M., & McGee, S. (2021). Assessing computational thinking: An overview of the field. Computer Science Education, 31, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1918380
  47. Wider, W., Jiang, L., Lin, J., Fauzi, M. A., Li, J., & Chan, C. K. (2024). Metaverse chronicles: A bibliometric analysis of its evolving landscape. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4873–4886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227825
  48. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  49. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  50. Xie, Z., Radloff, J., Wong, G., & Yeter, I. (2022). The future nexus of computational thinking education: A preliminary systematic review of reviews. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (pp. 548–553). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00096
  51. Zárate-Pérez, E., Cornejo-Carbajal, C., Melgarejo-Alcántara, M., Ramos-Moreno, J., & Acevedo-Carrillo, M. (2023). Design thinking capabilities in the STEAM education: A bibliometric analysis. LACCEI, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2023.1.1.294
  52. Zhaisanova, D., & Mansurova, M. (2023). A bibliometric study on blockchain concept: A theme analysis and future directions for computer science training. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 15, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.37943/15owjc3702