Research Article

Beyond functionality: Building critical digital teaching competence among future primary education teachers

Linda Castañeda 1 * , Daniel Villar-Onrubia 2 3
More Detail
1 Faculty of Education, University of Murcia, Murcia, SPAIN2 Disruptive Media Learning Lab, Coventry University, Coventry, UK3 Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, SPAIN* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), January 2023, ep397, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12599
Published Online: 02 November 2022, Published: 01 January 2023
OPEN ACCESS   3011 Views   1680 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)
This article belongs to the special issue: “No way back: from naive social media practices to committed approaches”

ABSTRACT

Digital literacy has moved away from its traditional instrumental conception, to be nourished by critical perspectives that have been increasingly adopted in all areas of the analysis of technology and education. The importance of generating educational models that contribute to the emancipation of people in a post-digital and highly complex world is an increasingly evident challenge. However, it is still difficult to find concrete examples of pedagogical strategies specifically devised to foster digital literacy in line with this much needed emerging critical lens. This paper presents a case study of a set of learning experiences integrated into a compulsory module for students in the 1st year of a degree in education sciences, which leads to the qualification required to teach at primary schools in Spain. The results highlight the importance of providing students with learning opportunities conceived to help them become future teachers ready to have a transversal impact on education for the emancipation of people in the post-digital world, rather than simply training them as operators who use technology to enhance skills.
Keywords: digital literacy, digital competence, teachers’ education, critical digital literacy, digital education

CITATION (APA)

Castañeda, L., & Villar-Onrubia, D. (2023). Beyond functionality: Building critical digital teaching competence among future primary education teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), ep397. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12599

REFERENCES

  1. Albion, P. R., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Information and communication technology and education: Meaningful change through teacher agency. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_25-1
  2. Ansley, L. M., & Watson, G. P. L. (2018). Rubric for eLearning tool evaluation. Center for Teaching and Learning. Western University. https://teaching.uwo.ca/pdf/elearning/Rubric-for-eLearning-Tool-Evaluation.pdf
  3. Barak, M., Hussein-Farraj, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2016). On-campus or online: Examining self-regulation and cognitive transfer skills in different learning settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0035-9
  4. Bayne, S. (2015). What’s the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19860
  6. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
  7. Biesta, G., Takayama, K., Kettle, M., & Heimans, S. (2020). Teacher education between principle, politics, and practice: A statement from the new editors of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 455-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1818485
  8. Castañeda, L. (2021). Una experiencia de diseño de una tarea de evaluación sumativa en formato transmedia para formación inicial de profesorado [A design experience of a summative evaluation task in transmedia format for initial teacher training]. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia [Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education], 24(2), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29148
  9. Castañeda, L., Esteve-Mon, F. M., Adell, J., & Prestridge, S. (2021). International insights about a holistic model of teaching competence for a digital era: The digital teacher framework reviewed. European Journal of Teacher Education, 0(0), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1991304
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., & Aitken, G. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600407
  11. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
  12. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2013.053248
  13. Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050
  14. Eltahir, M. E. (2019). E-learning in developing countries: Is it a panacea? A case study of Sudan. IEEE Access, 7, 97784-97792. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930411
  15. European Union. (2019). Digital education action plan (2021-2027). European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/node/1518
  16. Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital technology and the futures of education–towards ‘non-stupid’ optimism. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377071.locale=en
  17. Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy–Technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
  18. Fotopoulou, A. (2021). Conceptualizing critical data literacies for civil society organizations: Agency, care, and social responsibility. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1640-1657. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1716041
  19. Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of e-learning. Ubiquity, 2008(June), 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1403922.1386860
  20. Gourlay, L. (2021). There is no ‘virtual learning’: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.649
  21. Gouseti, A., Bruni, I., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Mundy, D., Raffaghelli, J. E., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., Romero, M., & Romeu, T. (2021). Critical digital literacies framework for educators–DETECT project report 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5070329
  22. Gummer, E. S., & Mandinach, E. B. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700401
  23. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2005). Reconstructing technoliteracy: A multiple literacies approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(3), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.3.4
  24. Kimmons, R. (2022). Mixed methods: How does one go about doing good mixed methods research? In R. Kimmons (Ed.), Education research. EdTech Books.
  25. Komljenovic, J. (2020). The future of value in digitalized higher education: Why data privacy should not be our biggest concern. Higher Education, 83, 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00639-7
  26. Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., & Veermans, M. (2019). The online learning process and scaffolding in student teachers’ personal learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 755-779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4
  27. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
  28. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Data and privacy literacy. In D. Frau‐Meigs, S. Kotilainen, M. Pathak‐Shelat, M. Hoechsmann, & S. R. Poyntz (Eds.), The handbook of media education research (pp. 413-425). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166900.ch38
  29. Loftus, M., & Madden, M. G. (2020). A pedagogy of data and artificial intelligence for student subjectification. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 456-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748593
  30. Marín, V. I., & Castañeda, L. (2022). Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter, & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_18-1
  31. Marín, V. I., & Salinas, J. (2022). Balance between guidance and self-regulated learning: Teaching and learning strategies in online, hybrid and blended learning in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.770
  32. Marín, V. I., Carpenter, J. P., & Tur, G. (2021). Pre‐service teachers’ perceptions of social media data privacy policies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035
  33. Markham, A. N. (2019). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754-760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809470
  34. Markham, A. N. (2020). Taking data literacy to the streets: Critical pedagogy in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419859024
  35. Martínez Bonafé, J. M. (2001). Arqueología del concepto ‘compromiso social’ en el discurso pedagógico y de formación docente [Archeology of the concept ‘social commitment’ in the pedagogical discourse and teacher training]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa [Electronic Journal of Educational Research], 3(1), 78-105.
  36. Mierzwa, D., & Mierzwa, D. (2020). Organizational culture of higher education institutions in the process of implementing changes–case study. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(Sup1), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1848377
  37. Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2009). Encyclopedia of case study research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
  38. Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualizing critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
  39. Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A.-L., & Ledesma, A. G. L. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291
  40. Pavlik, J. V. (2015). Fueling a third paradigm of education: The pedagogical implications of digital, social and mobile media. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6143
  41. Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter? Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0
  42. Rambe, P. (2017). Spaces for interactive engagement or technology for differential academic participation? Google groups for collaborative learning at a South African University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9141-5
  43. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711
  44. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466
  45. Rudd, T., & Goodson, I. F. (Eds.). (2016). Negotiating neoliberalism: Developing alternative educational visions. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-854-9
  46. Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
  47. Scholz, R. W., & Tietje, O. (2001). Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984027
  48. Scott, K. S., Sorokti, K. H., & Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning “beyond the classroom” within an enterprise social network system. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.005
  49. Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886350
  50. Selwyn, N., & Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital living in the age of COVID-19: Unsettling what we see as possible. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 989-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00166-9
  51. Sendag, S., Erol, O., Sezgin, S., & Dulkadir, N. (2015). Preservice teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and Web 2.0 competencies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6148
  52. Solmaz, O. (2018). A critical review of research on social networking sites in language teaching and learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.444120
  53. Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
  54. Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867
  55. Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Braak, J. van, Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556
  56. Villar-Onrubia, D., & Marín, V. (2022). Independently-hosted web publishing. Internet Policy Review, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.2.1665
  57. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens–With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
  58. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Media Freedom Resource Centre OBCT. https://www.rcmediafreedom.eu/Publications/Reports/Information-disorder-Toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making
  59. Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2020). Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of COVID-19. Education International.
  60. Wood, D. M., & Monahan, T. (2019). Editorial: Platform surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13237
  61. Yeoman, P. (2018). The material correspondence of learning. In R. A. Ellis, & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3
  62. Zeichner, K., Bowman, M., Guillen, L., & Napolitan, K. (2016). Engaging and working in solidarity with local communities in preparing the teachers of their children. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660623
  63. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.