Research Article

Transformation of Pedagogical Communicative Competence during Creation Digital Online Courses

Maxim L. Grunis 1 * , Inna I. Golovanova 1, Galiya I. Kirilova 1, Elena Y. Levina 2, Zhanna M. Sizova 3
More Detail
1 Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Russia2 Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, Russia3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Russia* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), January 2021, ep289, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9313
OPEN ACCESS   3043 Views   1760 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this work is to identify the transformations of communicative functions. These functions are associated with the subjects of communication in both fields: in pedagogical and organizational, also in the instrumental and design once during the process of creating digital video recordings for online courses. Questionnaires, observation, and factor analysis were used as research methods. It helped to formulate a popularity rating of digital tools for future teachers. The study was conducted at the Institute of Psychology and Education of Kazan (Volga region) Federal University. The study involved 120 people: teachers developing online courses and students studying at the pedagogical educational programs. Transforming indicators of pedagogical communicative competence are highlighted. These indicators are needed to be emphasized when improving teacher training. It will help future teachers to be able to effectively carry out their activities in digital educational environment. These indicators are: the ability to organize interactive cooperation during training, the ability to organize mutual exchange and development of students, the ability to create an open environment for analysis and improvement. The methodological aspects of the development of pedagogical communication functions in the dynamic environment of digital education and an interactive environment are disclosed on the basis of work with videos. Some recommendations for future teachers’ skills improving and development of training experience organization in the digital environment are given. These are a clearly-set-goal for educational video materials, adequate video content, skills for digital tools using, also the skill to choose adequate digital tools for a task fulfillment. The tool that can enhance enthusiasm, and stimulate students for productive work in a digital environment. The study allows improving video content and increasing the effectiveness of its use in the educational process. Also, the results of the experiment can become a basis for teacher training programs improving. Especially it can be useful for future teachers’ pedagogical communicative and digital competences development. The tasks developed within the frame of the research will be included in the assignments of pedagogical internship for pedagogical Master’s degree courses at the Institute of Psychology and Education of Kazan Federal University. These tasks for students include development and use of online courses with video materials.
Keywords: pedagogical communicative competence, digital educational environment, digital video recordings, educational videos, online courses

CITATION (APA)

Grunis, M. L., Golovanova, I. I., Kirilova, G. I., Levina, E. Y., & Sizova, Z. M. (2021). Transformation of Pedagogical Communicative Competence during Creation Digital Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), ep289. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9313

REFERENCES

  1. Asafova, E., & Golovanova, I. (2017). Competence Approach in Teacher Training in The Process of Development and Testing of the Module «Interaction of Educational Relations participants. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 29, 74-82. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.08.02.10
  2. Bąk, T., Kardis, M., Valco, M., Kalimullin, A. M., & Galushkin, A. A. (2019). A philosophical-sociological diagnosis of youth subcultures in the context of social changes. XLinguae, 12(2), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.02.14
  3. Bayanova, A. R., Vodenko, K. V., Sizova, Zh. M., Chistyakov, A. A., Prokopiev, A. I., & Vasbieva, D. G. (2019). A philosophical view of organizational culture in contemporary universities. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), 121-131.
  4. Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students Perception of Mobile Learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University Student Perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20023. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8443
  5. Blomberg, G., Sherin, M. G., Renkl, A., Glogger, I., & Seidel, T. (2014). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 42(3), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6
  6. Brunvand, S. (2010). Best practices for producing video content for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 247-256.
  7. Bubnova, I. S., Khvatova, M. A., Chernik, V. E., Popova, O. V., Prokopyev, A. I., Naumov, P. Yu., & Babarykin, O. V. (2018). Research of Professional Activity Features of Ecologist at Carrying Out Public Ecological Examination. Ekoloji, 106, 999-1006, Article No: e106183.
  8. Burden, K., & Atkinson, S. (2008). Beyond Content: Developing Transferable Learning Designs with Digital Video Archives. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 4041-4050. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Chesapeake: AACE.
  9. Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20018. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8315
  10. Calandra, B., & Rich, P. J. (2014). Digital video for teacher education: Research and practice. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871714
  11. Castro, W. F., Pino-Fan, L. R., Lugo-Armenta, J. G., Toro, J. A., & Retamal, S. (2020). A Mathematics Education Research Agenda in Latin America Motivated by Coronavirus Pandemic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1919. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9277
  12. Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on stanford’s moocs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2408776.2408787
  13. Craft, A. (2010). Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. London: Trentham Books Ltd.
  14. Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Online Learning in Higher Institutions of Education: A Survey of the Perceptions of Ghanaian International Students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/8286
  15. Donetskaya, O. I., Golovanova, I. I., & Singatullova A. A. (2017). New teacher for a new school: participants of educational process on the problem. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, 29, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.08.02.31
  16. Firsova, I., Vasbieva, D., Prokopyev, A. I., Zykin, E. S., & Matvienko, V. V. (2018). Development of consumers’ behavior business model on energy market. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(4), 227-233.
  17. Golovanova, I. I., Telegina, N. V., & Doneckaya, O. I. (2019). Podgotovka k professionalnoy deyatelnosti budushhego pedagoga na osnove razrabotannoy sistemy ocenki sformirovannosti kompetenciy. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie, 1, 58-68.
  18. Holtzblatt, M., & Tschakert, N. (2011). Expanding your accounting classroom with digital video technology. Journal of Accounting Education, 29(2-3), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2011.10.003
  19. Huang, R., Yang, J., & Hu, Y. (2012). From digital to smart: The evolution and trends of learning environment. Open Education Research, 1(1), 75-84.
  20. Kardis, M., Sturak, P., Králik, R., Trong, D. N., Korzhuev, A. V., & Kryukova, N. I. (2019). A sociological-religious probe into contemporary global salafi jihadism. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(4), 113-125.
  21. Khairullina, E. R., Shubovich, M. M., Bogdanova, V. I., Slepneva, E. V., Mashkin, N. A., & Rodyukova, T. N. (2020). Modern student youth civic identity: Political activity or social responsibility? Opcion, 36(Special Edition 27), 1703–1717.
  22. Kolgatin, O. (2016). Dynamics of views on ethics of pedagogical diagnostics in information and communication learning environment. Information Technologies in Education, 29, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000608
  23. Lounis, M. (2020). Promoting School Health Education: A Lesson from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(2), ep20009. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/8579
  24. Makarova, E. V., Kryukova, N. I., Sizova, Z. M., Grinenko, A. V., Erofeeva, M. A., & Bukalerova, L. A. (2019). Divergence of supreme values of Russian world and western civilization social and philosophical analysis. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), 97-107.
  25. Markless, S. (2009). A new conception of information literacy for the digital environment in higher education. Nordic journal of information literacy in higher education, 1(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v1i1.17
  26. McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian journal of educational technology, 25(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1136
  27. Min, H., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2020). Self-Regulated Learning In A Massive Open Online Course: A Review of Literature. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(2), e02007. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8403
  28. Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Prospective Teachers’ Online Learning Mathematics Activities in The Age of COVID-19: A Cluster Analysis Approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1872. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8345
  29. Orekhovskaya, N. A., Chistyakov, A. A., Kryukova, N. I., Krokhina, J. A., Ospennikov, Y. V., & Makarova, E. V. (2019). Orthodoxy and modernity their contact facets in Russian society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(2), 67-77.
  30. Petrides, L., Nguyen, L., Jimes, C., & Karaglani, A. (2008). Open educational resources: inquiring into author use and reuse. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1-2), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2008.020233
  31. Piralova, O. F., Gerasimenko, S. A., Kuznetsov, V. V., Popova, O. V., Subbotin, G. V., Kolomyts, O. G., & Mashkin, N. A. (2020). Gaming Industry Trends in new Generation Specialist Training in University Environment. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(3), 1132-1135.
  32. Rassolov, I. M., Chubukova, S. G., Mokhov, A. A., & Shagieva, R. V. (2020). Genetic information and personal data under conditions of digital transformation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 284-292.
  33. Rickard, A., McAvinia, C., & Quirke-Bolt, N. (2009). The challenge of change: Digital video-analysis and constructivist teaching approaches on a one-year preservice teacher education program in Ireland. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 349-367.
  34. Salame, I. I., & Hanna, E. (2020). Studying the impact of online homework on the perceptions, attitudes, study habits, and learning experiences of chemistry students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4), e2221. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8543
  35. Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893
  36. Vai, M., & Sosulski, K. (2015). Essentials of online course design: A standards-based guide. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315770901
  37. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta psychologica, 41(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9
  38. Xin, C., & Feenberg, A. (2006). Pedagogy in cyberspace: The dynamics of online discourse. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 21(2), 1-25.
  39. Zyubina, I. A., Dzyubenko, A. I., Borisenko, V. A., Popova, O. V., & Prokopyev, A. I. (2019). Implicit linguopragmatic strategies of speech behavior of English-speaking prosecutors. XLinguae, 12(4), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.08