Research Article

Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course

Hicham Ziyad 1 *
More Detail
1 Hassan II University, Morocco* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), October 2016, 314-330, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6179
OPEN ACCESS   2168 Views   1696 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In the past fifteen years, Web 2.0 social networking technologies have ushered in a new era of information production, distribution and consumption with significant implications for language teaching and learning. An example of such technology is Moodle, which is a learning management system with several useful features that can transform the learning environment into a site for interactivity, connectivity and great amounts of extensive learning. With this in mind, the present case study aims to investigate tertiary education students’ acceptance of and engagement in a Moodle-hosted writing course. Using case study methodology, qualitative data were elicited from 24 semester-two students on the basis of focus group interviews constructed in line with Technology Acceptance Model 2. Another source of data is Moodle log reports, which offered a detailed account of students’ contributions and activities in the online writing course. The results showed that almost all the students perceived Moodle as a useful tool for sharing, collaboration and learning. The results also uncovered three different categories of students in terms of level of engagement; namely, highly engaged, moderately engaged and poorly engaged. The implications of these results for an effective implementation of Moodle are discussed.

Keywords: ELT, Moodle, Technology acceptance, Engagement, Blended writing course

CITATION (APA)

Ziyad, H. (2016). Technology-mediated ELT Writing: Acceptance and Engagement in an Online Moodle Course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6179

REFERENCES

  1. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Mor, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  2. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
  3. Ebner, M., & Kickmeier-Rust, M. (2008). Utilizing Wiki-Systems in higher education classes: A chance for universal access? Univ Access Inf Soc(7), 199-207.
  4. Erguig, R. (2009). The use of information technologies and audiovisual media in ELT: The department of English in El-jadida, Morocco, as a case study. Porto Linguarum, 11, 115-128.
  5. Helen J. Parkin, J. H., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., & Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963-973.
  6. Jonas, G. A., & Norman, C. S. (2011). Textbook websites: User technology acceptance behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 147-159.
  7. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 119-132
  8. Mason, B. R. (2011). Student Engagement with, and Participation in, an e-Forum. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 258-268.
  9. Ministry of National Education in Morocco. (1999). National Charter of Education and Training. Retrieved on 14 February 2014, from http://www.cse.org.ma/ar/admin_files/ressources/ charte-men_ar.pdf
  10. Neumann, L. D., & Hood, M. (2009 ). The effects of using a wiki on student engagement and learning of report writing skills in a university statistics course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 382-398.
  11. Ouardaoui, A., Legrouri, A., Darhmaoui, H., & Loudiyi, K. (2012). ICT integration into chemistryphysics classes in middle schools through a participatory pilot project approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 55, 232-238.
  12. Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
  13. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  14. Venter, P., van Rensburg, J. M., & Davis, A. (2012). Drivers of learning management system use in a South African open and distance learning institution. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 183-198.
  15. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.
  16. Zyad, H. (2016a). Integrating computers in the classroom: Barriers and teachers' attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 67-78.
  17. Zyad, H. (2016b). L2 writing development: The case of two high-achieving and two struggling college-level students. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(1), 25-36