Research Article

Technology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education

Fatimah Alhashem 1 * , Abdullah Alfailakawi 2
More Detail
1 Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait City, KUWAIT2 Kuwait University, Kuwait City, KUWAIT* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), October 2023, ep474, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739
Published Online: 30 September 2023, Published: 01 October 2023
OPEN ACCESS   2255 Views   1764 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research studied the impact of integrating virtual laboratories in chemistry lessons among 22 pre-service teachers who were enrolled in a Bachelor of Education program, focusing on middle and high school science. These participants were systematically divided into an experimental group (EG) and a control group. Both groups engaged in the same organic chemistry lesson and subsequent lab session, the only difference being that EG received additional training via a virtual laboratory prior to the hands-on lab session. A survey, conducted both before and after the experiment, was utilized to measure participants’ attitudes towards the use of virtual laboratories. The quantitative data analysis revealed a significant positive shift in EG’s attitudes post-intervention, suggesting that virtual laboratory experiences enhance their learning and engagement. Specifically, participants exhibited improved understanding of the educational methodologies and heightened engagement during the physical lab work. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning the technical aspects of the experiments, implying that the virtual labs’ impact on perspectives about the technical components of a chemistry lab was consistent across both groups. These findings support the view of virtual laboratories as a viable supporting tool for science education, promoting technology integration into teaching practices to meet the demands of 21st century learning outcomes. This research concludes with recommendations for future studies to explore further the implications of virtual labs on various aspects of science education.
Keywords: virtual laboratory, chemistry, organic chemistry, pre-service teacher, training, science education, laboratory

CITATION (APA)

Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep474. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739

REFERENCES

  1. Ali, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Review to analyze and compare virtual chemistry laboratories for their use in education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3563-3574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00185
  2. Babateen, H. (2011). The role of virtual laboratories in science education. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education. IACSIT Press.
  3. Babinčáková, M., & Bernard, P. (2020). Online experimentation during COVID-19 secondary school closures: Teaching methods and student perceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3295-3300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00748
  4. Cetin-Dindar, A., Boz, Y., Sonmez, D. Y., & Celep, N. D. (2018). Development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00175D
  5. Chittleborough, G. (2014). Learning how to teach chemistry with technology: Pre-service teachers’ experiences with integrating technology into their learning and teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9387-y
  6. Denmark, S. E. (2009). Organic reactions: Allylboration of carbonyl compounds. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Distor, A. A., Sarmiento, B. G., Guevarra, J. L. T., Narvaez, D. E., Rebong, R. S. A., & Umayan, R. M. B. (2022). Virtual laboratory as a learning tool for anatomy and physiology course. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.491
  8. Elkhouly, M. (2021). Perceptions of undergraduate students, lecturers, and lab assistants towards the use of online laboratory in science education during COVID-19 pandemic [PhD dissertation, Qatar University].
  9. Gambari, A. I., Kawu, H., & Falode, O. C. (2018). Impact of virtual laboratory on the achievement of secondary school chemistry students in homogeneous and heterogeneous collaborative environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.444108
  10. Jamovi. (2022). Jamovi software version 2.3. https://www.jamovi.org
  11. Kay, R., Goulding, H., & Li, J. (2018). Assessing the impact of a virtual lab in an allied health program. Journal of Allied Health, 47(1), 45-50.
  12. Lynch, M. (2016). 4 benefits of virtual labs. The Edvocate. https://www.theedadvocate.org/4-benefits-of-virtual-labs/
  13. Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Factors affecting secondary schools students’ attitudes toward learning chemistry: A review of literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1931. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379
  14. Mutlu, A., & Acar Sesen, B. (2016). Impact of virtual chemistry laboratory instruction on pre-service science teachers’ scientific process skills. In Proceedings of the ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601088
  15. Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A., Mukamanzi, O. U., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2022). Rubric-based formative assessment to support students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools in Rwanda: A technology-based learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12251-12271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5
  16. Patil, I. (2018). ggstatsplot: ‘ggplot2’ based plots with statistical details. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggstatsplot
  17. Peechapol, C. (2021). Investigating the effect of virtual laboratory simulation in chemistry on learning achievement, self-efficacy, and learning experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(20), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i20.23561
  18. R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://cran.r-project.org
  19. Revelle, W. (2019). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
  20. Tuysuz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53.
  21. Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
  22. Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., & Rstudio (2018). ggplot2: Create elegant data visualizations using the grammar of graphics. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggplot2
  23. Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after COVID-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3