Review Article

Technological pedagogical content knowledge in science education: A scientometric review

Brian Shambare 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology Education, University of the Free State, Phuthaditjhaba, SOUTH AFRICA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), July 2026, ep677, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19081
Published: 06 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   185 Views   115 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study presents one of the first scientometric reviews of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in science education. The review highlights how teachers’ digital pedagogical knowledge has been conceptualised and evolved to support learner-content, learner-teacher, and learner-technology interaction in science education. The analysis drew on 564 bibliographic records from the Web of Science from 2014 to 2024. Quantitative methods were applied to capture publication growth, citation impact, contributions from countries, institutions, journals and authors, and thematic development. Data analysis included network analysis, polynomial regression, least squares trend analysis, and Chi-square tests. Bradford’s and Lotka’s laws were applied to assess journal and author productivity. Science mapping tools supported visualization, including VOSviewer, Biblioshiny, and the Bibliometrix R package. Advanced statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package for the social sciences. The results show accelerated growth in TPACK publications after 2018, with output peaking between 2020 and 2022 as pandemic-driven demands increased the use of educational technologies. China, the United States, and Turkey emerged as the leading contributors, while Nanyang Technological University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong dominated institutional output. Chai Ching Sing was found to be the most prolific author. Author productivity revealed that TPACK scholarship in science education is dominated by one-time contributors supported by a small core of active scholars. Thematic evolution reveals a shift from knowledge integration toward teacher education and professional development, with recent expansion into mathematics and science education.
Keywords: TPACK, science education, scientometrics, science mapping, citation analysis, thematic evolution

CITATION (APA)

Shambare, B. (2026). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in science education: A scientometric review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), ep677. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19081

REFERENCES

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22, 2087-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
  2. Amiruddin, M. Z. B., Agustin, M., Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., & Costu, B. (2024). A decade of TPACK in science education: Trends and insights from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 466-488. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428419
  3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & education, 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  4. Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
  5. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  6. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualising knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
  7. Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
  8. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.201304_16(2).0004
  9. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.201010_13(4).0007
  10. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
  11. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  12. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d
  13. Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 147-157. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5
  14. García-Carmona, A. (2025). Scientific thinking and critical thinking in science education: Two distinct but symbiotically related intellectual processes. Science & Education, 34, 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00460-5
  15. Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to Scientometrics visualising the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009
  16. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010
  17. Harari, Y. N. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550, 324-327. https://doi.org/10.1038/550324a
  18. Helingo, A., & Nurpahmi, S. (2024). Mapping the evolution: A bibliometric dive into TPACK research trends (2020-2023). Journal of English Teaching and Linguistic Issues, 3(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v3i2.1837
  19. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  20. Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52, 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
  21. Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  22. Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2008.10700853
  23. Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y
  24. Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & education, 59(2), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
  25. Karampelas, K. (2023). Examining the relationship between TPACK and STEAM through a bibliometric study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 488-498. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12981
  26. Kastrin, A., & Hristovski, D. (2021). Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986-2020). Scientometrics, 126(2), 1415-1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03811-z
  27. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & education, 78, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022
  28. Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre‐service teachers with a large‐scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x
  29. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
  30. Lee, H.-Y., Chung, C.-Y., & Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.765233
  31. Long, J., & Ryoo, J. (2010). Using fractional polynomials to model non-linear trends in longitudinal data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(1), 177-203. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711009X431509
  32. Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4
  33. Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6
  34. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
  35. Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
  36. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  37. Mishra, P., McCaleb, L., & Oster, N. (2025). Beyond classroom walls: The new psycho-social ecology of GenAI. AI Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.70725/903864xliqqy
  38. Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya. Nauka.
  39. Ng, D. T. K., Chan, E. K. C., & Lo, C. K. (2025). Opportunities, challenges and school strategies for integrating generative AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373
  40. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
  41. Nyulas, J., Dezsi, Ș., Niță, A. F., Magyari-Sáska, Z., Frey, M. L., & Horváth, A. (2025). Twenty-five years of scientific production on geoparks from the perspective of bibliometric analysis using PRISMA. Sustainability, 17(5), Article 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052218
  42. Petko, D., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2025). TPACK in context: An updated model. Computers and Education Open, 8, Article 100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100244
  43. Prasetya, A., & Irwanto, I. (2025). Research trend on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK): A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 13(3), 638-669. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4808
  44. Putri, A. H., Robandi, B., Samsudin, A., & Suhandi, A. (2022). Science education research within TPACK framework at a glance: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 6(3), 458-476. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.404
  45. Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS ONE, 12(3), Article e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778
  46. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967
  47. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
  48. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  49. Simangunsong, M. F., Waspada, I., Rasto, R., Muhammad, I., Triansyah, F. A., & Gunawan, A. (2023). The impact of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on learning outcomes: A bibliometric review. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1098-1107.
  50. Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C. H., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Research trend on TPACK through bibliometric analysis (2015-2019). International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1375-1385. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.22062
  51. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
  52. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  53. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  54. Yalçın, H., & Yayla, K. (2016). Scientometric analysis of the researches about technological pedagogical content knowledge and scholarly communication. Education and Science, 41(Supplement 2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6746
  55. Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012