Research Article

Scientific mapping of multimodal communication research in higher education: Thematic trends, intellectual structure, and future directions

Alexandra D. Serdakova 1 * , Nataliya N. Drobysheva 2 , Oksana V. Shiryaeva-Shiring 3 , Alexander A. Evgrafov 4 , Oksana K. Korobkova 5 , Ekaterina G. Sokolova 6
More Detail
1 Department of Pedagogy and Medical Psychology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA2 Department of English Language and Professional Communication, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA3 Institute of Interdisciplinary Education and Ibero-American Studies, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, RUSSIA4 Department of Analytical, Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA5 Higher School of Economics, Pacific National University, Khabarovsk, RUSSIA6 Institute of Foreign Languages, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), July 2026, ep680, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19084
Published: 06 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   201 Views   107 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study presents a systematic and scientific mapping of multimodal communication research conducted in higher education, examining the field’s thematic trends, intellectual structure, and future directions through combined bibliometric and content-based analysis, drawing on 63 peer-reviewed journal articles retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus published between 2016 and 2026. The selection process followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, with studies screened against two eligibility criteria: situatedness in higher education and multimodal communication as a primary analytical focus. Frequency analysis was applied to annual publication trends, research methods, author keywords, journal distribution, and abstract vocabulary, while thematic classification organized the corpus into six clusters. Findings indicate a marked acceleration in publication output from 2022 onwards, with the period 2022-2025 accounting for 66.7% of all studies. Quantitative approaches constitute the largest methodological category (30.2%), followed by conceptual and theoretical works (28.6%) and qualitative studies (22.2%). Six thematic clusters were identified: language teaching and multimodal resources (38.1%), multimodal literacy and competence (20.6%), technology-enhanced multimodal learning (14.3%), classroom interaction and multimodal communication (14.3%), institutional and organizational communication (6.3%), and theoretical and methodological frameworks (6.3%). Abstract word analysis reveals a lexical shift from literacy- and theory-oriented vocabulary in the early period towards digital, interaction, and technology-centered terminology after 2021. Co-authorship analysis identifies a moderately collaborative field with an average of 2.78 authors per study. The future direction analysis revealed 34 research priorities under six thematic clusters, with theoretical/methodological development, multimodal assessment in higher education, and technology-enhanced learning being highlighted as the most prominent areas for future research. The findings collectively suggest that the field is transitioning from theoretical consolidation towards applied, empirically driven, and technology-informed inquiry, with institutional communication and artificial intelligence-mediated multimodal learning emerging as underexplored directions for future research.
Keywords: multimodal communication, higher education, systematic mapping review, bibliometric analysis, thematic trends

CITATION (APA)

Serdakova, A. D., Drobysheva, N. N., Shiryaeva-Shiring, O. V., Evgrafov, A. A., Korobkova, O. K., & Sokolova, E. G. (2026). Scientific mapping of multimodal communication research in higher education: Thematic trends, intellectual structure, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), ep680. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19084

REFERENCES

  1. *Abbas, N. F., Awad, Z. E., & Mohaisen, A. K. (2025). YouTube as a learning tool among EFL learners: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal, SI, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call11.6
  2. *Acartürk, C., Coskun, M., & Emil, S. (2021). Multimodal communication in instructional settings: An investigation of the functional roles of gestures and arrows. Revista Signos, 54(107), 867-892. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342021000300867
  3. Airey, J. (2015). Social semiotics in higher education: Examples from teaching and learning in undergraduate physics. DiVA Portal. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-266049
  4. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20265
  5. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2017). Social semiotics in university physics education. In D. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 95-122). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_5
  6. *Alsamh, M. H., Hawbani, A., Kumar, S., & Alsamhi, S. H. (2024). Multisensory metaverse-6G: A new paradigm of commerce and education. IEEE Access, 12, 75657-75677. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392838
  7. Alwahaby, H., Cukurova, M., Papamitsiou, Z., & Giannakos, M. (2021). The evidence of impact and ethical considerations of multimodal learning analytics: A systematic literature review. In M. Giannakos, D. Spikol, D. Di Mitri, K. Sharma, X. Ochoa, & R. Hammad (Eds.), The multimodal learning analytics handbook (pp. 289-325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08076-0_12
  8. Andries, F., Meissl, K., De Vries, C., Feyaerts, K., Oben, B., Sambre, P., Vermeerbergen, M., & Brône, G. (2023). Multimodal stance-taking in interaction—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1187977
  9. Argyriou, M., & Tapsis, N. (2025). Reframing multimodality in contemporary education: A critical review of research patterns and pedagogical shifts. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 10(3), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i3.6106
  10. *Aslan, S., Durham, L. M., Alyuz, N., Chierichetti, R., Denman, P. A., Okur, E., Aguirre, D. I. G., Esquivel, J. C. Z., Cordourier Maruri, H. A., Sharma, S., Raffa, G., Mayer, R. E., & Nachman, L. (2024). What is the impact of a multi-modal pedagogical conversational AI system on parents’ concerns about technology use by young children? British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1625-1650. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13399
  11. Avalos Pérez, M. Á., Zabala-Haro, A., Marcelo, P., Humanante, T., Morales Rodas, L. Y., & Galimberti, J. V. (2023). Modalities of teaching learning through information and communication technologies in higher education. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33, 2953-2968. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.918
  12. *Baig Falgueras, M., Boned Ribas, P., Gonzalez-Ceballos, I., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2023). Artefactos identitarios multimodales 2.0 como mecanismo de personalización del aprendizaje en educación superior. Un estudio cualitativo [Multimodal identity artifacts 2.0 as a mechanism for personalizing learning in higher education. A qualitative study]. RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 26(2), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.2.36227
  13. *Bekturova, M., Gaipov, D., Dyankova, G. H., & Tulepova, S. (2025). Examining multimodal literacy skills among EMI teachers in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 13(1), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-1-217-222
  14. *Beltrán-Palanques, V. (2024). Assessing video game narratives: Implications for the assessment of multimodal literacy in ESP. Assessing Writing, 60, Article 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100809
  15. *Bernad-Mechó, E. (2024). Building successful communication in EMI contexts: A multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47(2), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2024-0206
  16. *Bowen, T. (2017). Assessing visual literacy: A case study of developing a rubric for identifying and applying criteria to undergraduate student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 705-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1289507
  17. Breuer, E., & Archer, A. (2016). Multimodality in higher education. Brill/Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004312067
  18. *Cai, Y., Pan, Z., Han, S., Shao, P., & Liu, M. (2022). The impact of multimodal communication on learners’ experience in a synchronous online environment: A mixed-methods study. Online Learning, 26(4), 118-145. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3448
  19. *Candarli, D. (2025). A corpus-based multimodal analysis of written assignments in the target language use domain: Implications for L2 multimodal writing task design and assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 22(4-5), 582-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2025.2596375
  20. *Cervera, F., Schmidt, T., & Schwadron, H. (2021). Towards planetary performance pedagogy: Digital companions in multipolar classrooms. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 12(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443927.2020.1829694
  21. *Chang, Y. (2022). Mobilizing multi-semiotics in intercultural communication: Asian international students’ experience of using English as a multilingua franca in a Taiwanese university. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 19(1), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202204_19(1).0003
  22. Chen, C.-L. (2020). Visualizing the knowledge domain of multimodal discourse analysis (2009-2019): A bibliometric review. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 2(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v2i1.1205
  23. Chen, L., Abdullah, M. A. R., Abdullah, S. N. S., Hussin, S., & Rahman, R. A. (2025). A bibliometric survey on multimodal discourse analysis (2015-2024): Looking behind to look ahead. English Language and Literature Studies, 15(3), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v15n3p99
  24. Christian, I., Rohmah, Z., & Jalaluddin, I. (2024). Exploring studies on multimodal literacy in English learning: A bibliometric analysis. JEELS: Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 11(2), 821-848. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i2.3681
  25. *Cienki, A. (2016). Cognitive linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0063
  26. *Coccetta, F. (2018). Developing university students’ multimodal communicative competence: Field research into multimodal text studies in English. System, 77, 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.004
  27. Crescenzi Lanna, L. (2020). Multimodal learning analytics research with young children: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1485-1504. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12959
  28. *Delport, M. (2020). Lost in communication in higher education. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 46(3), 106-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2020.1826552
  29. *Derboven, J., Geerts, D., & De Grooff, D. (2017). Appropriating virtual learning environments: A study of teacher tactics. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 40, 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002
  30. *Durst-Andersen, P., & Cobley, P. (2018). The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication. Semiotica, 2018(225), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0228
  31. Eka, W., Rahmanu, D., & Molnár, G. (2024). Multimodal immersion in English language learning in higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10, Article e38357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38357
  32. *Escobar-Alméciga, W. Y. (2025). Ethnography of multimodal communication: An English-mediated university classroom interaction analysis. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 27(2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v27n2.115294
  33. *Escobar-Alméciga, W. Y., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2022). Multimodal communication in an early childhood bilingual education setting: A social semiotic interaction analysis. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 27(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v27n1a05
  34. *Fedorenko, S. V. (2019). Experience of developing students’ multimodal literacy in the digital learning environment of higher education institutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 69(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v69i1.2405
  35. Firmansyah, M. B., Andriyani, A. D., & Asih, R. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of multimodality based on multimodal learning. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4298216
  36. Franceschet, M. (2011). Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1992-2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21614
  37. *Girón-García, C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2023). Science dissemination videos as multimodal supporting resources for ESP teaching in higher education. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.005
  38. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  39. *Gray, R. (2021). Multimodality in the classroom presentation genre: Findings from a study of Turkish psychology undergraduate talks. System, 99, Article 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102522
  40. *Gregson, M. (2025). The importance of the teacher-researcher-artist in curriculum design, development and assessment in vocational education in England. Education Sciences, 16(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010024
  41. Guerrero-Sosa, J. D., Romero, F. P., Menéndez-Domínguez, V., Serrano-Guerrero, J., Montoro-Montarroso, A., & Olivas, J. (2025). A comprehensive review of multimodal analysis in education. Applied Sciences, 15(11), Article 5896. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115896
  42. *Hafner, C. A. (2020). Digital multimodal composing: How to address multimodal communication forms in ELT. English Teaching, 75(3), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.133
  43. *Hauck, M., Salomao, A. C. B., Satar, M., & Primo, G. (2025). Internationalisation at home through critical virtual exchange. AILA Review, 38(2), 262-293. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
  44. *Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). The role of eTwinning tools in social and curriculum integration using multimodal communication. Teaching English with Technology, 22(3-4), 63-84.
  45. *Ingerpuu-Rümmel, E. (2018). Translation as meaning constructor for new words in the multimodal communication of foreign language classrooms. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 14, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.5128/ERYa14.04
  46. Joseph, J., Thomas, B., Jose, J., & Pathak, N. (2023). Decoding the growth of multimodal learning: A bibliometric exploration of its impact and influence. International Journal of Intelligent Decision Technologies, 18(1), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.3233/IDT-230727
  47. *Joseph, S., Thompson, R., Soobramoney, S., & Wing, J. W. (2022). Emergency remote teaching and learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Efficacy of a four-stage model. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 9(2), 529-561. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2134
  48. Kapodistrias, A., & Airey, J. (2025). Multimodality and disciplinary learning: The case of purposeful transformation in the sciences. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1562515
  49. Khor, E., Tan, L., & Chan, S. H. L. (2024). Systematic review on the application of multimodal learning analytics to personalize students’ learning. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.56278/asten.vi.2750
  50. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University.
  51. *Kjeldsen, J., & Hess, A. (2021). Experiencing multimodal rhetoric and argumentation in political advertisements: A study of how people respond to the rhetoric of multimodal communication. Visual Communication, 20(3), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211013399
  52. *Koç, T., & Ergül, H. (2024). The use of material resources in vocabulary explanations: A conversation analytic inquiry. Text & Talk, 44(2), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0118
  53. *Korkealehto, K., & Leier, V. (2021). Facebook for engagement: Telecollaboration between Finland and New Zealand in German language learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2021010101
  54. Köhler, T., & Stemmler, M. (1997). Normative versus ipsative configural frequency analysis in personality research—Their use discussed in a reanalysis of data on situation-bound anxiety. European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199703)11:1<69::AID-PER277>3.0.CO;2-G
  55. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
  56. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
  57. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
  58. *Kwak, S. K. (2023). Learner initiative through multimodal communication resources in the English classroom. English Teaching, 78(3), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.3.202309.25
  59. *Lang, Q., Wang, M., Yin, M., Liang, S., & Song, W. (2025). Transforming education with generative AI (GAI): Key insights and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2025.3537618
  60. *Lehtonen, D., Joutsenlahti, J., & Perkkilä, P. (2023). Multimodal communication and peer interaction during equation-solving sessions with and without tangible technologies. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7010006
  61. Li, Y. (2024). Advancing language education through multimodality: Insights from a bibliographic analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6691
  62. *Liang, J.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). A robot-based digital storytelling approach to enhancing EFL learners’ multimodal storytelling ability and narrative engagement. Computers & Education, 201, Article 104827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104827
  63. Liu, H., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2024). Multimodal discourse studies in the international academic community (1997-2023): A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241305454
  64. Lopez, C. M. S., Mangulad, M. P., & Santos, J. M. (2025). The use of multimodal strategies to develop vocabulary and reading comprehension: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 6(8), 4068-4083. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.27
  65. Lu, Y. (2025). Mapping multimodal linguistics research: A CiteSpace bibliometric analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(8), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.10243
  66. *Maluleke, W. (2024). Usage of blackboard learn for teaching and learning in the historically disadvantaged institution: Challenges and prospects. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(5), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-5-6409
  67. *Manamela, L. E., Sumbane, G. O., Mutshatshi, T. E., Ngoatle, C., & Rasweswe, M. M. M. (2024). Multimodal teaching and learning challenges: Perspectives of undergraduate learner nurses at a higher education institution in South Africa. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 16(3), Article e1299. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2024.v16i3.1299
  68. Mattei, E. (2024). Approaching tourism communication with empirical multimodality: Exploratory analysis of Instagram and website photography through data-driven labeling. Frontiers in Communication, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1355406
  69. *McCafferty, S. G., & Rosborough, A. (2023). Contingency and multimodal communication in the learning environment: A second language read-aloud lesson. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 9(2), 175-201. https://doi.org/10.1558/LST.20987
  70. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
  71. *Morell, T., & Pastor Cesteros, S. (2018). Multimodal communication in academic oral presentations by L2 Spanish students. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 5(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2018.1538334
  72. Mu, S., Cui, M., & Huang, X. (2020). Multimodal data fusion in learning analytics: A systematic review. Sensors, 20(23), Article 6856. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236856
  73. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  74. *Ou, W. A., & Gu, M. M. (2022). Competence beyond language: Translanguaging and spatial repertoire in teacher-student interaction in a music classroom in an international Chinese university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(8), 2741-2758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1949261
  75. Ouhaichi, H., Spikol, D., & Vogel, B. (2023). Research trends in multimodal learning analytics: A systematic mapping study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136
  76. *Paxton, M., Frith, V., Kelly-Laubscher, R., Muna, N., & van der Merwe, M. (2017). Supporting the teaching of the visual literacies in the earth and life sciences in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1264-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1300139
  77. *Planer, R., Wolf, C., & Godulla, A. (2022). Digital storytelling beyond flagship projects: Exploring multimedia work routines in higher education practical training. Journalism Practice, 16(6), 1247-1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1832140
  78. *Ramesh, K., Thomas, C. A., Osei-Asiamah, J., Pagidipati, B., Muniyandy, E., Reddy, B. V. S., & El-Ebiary, Y. A. B. (2025). Cognitive load optimization in digital (ESL) learning: A hybrid BERT and FNN approach for adaptive content personalization. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 16(4), 564-576. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160457
  79. *Rasi, P., & Poikela, S. (2016). A review of video triggers and video production in higher education and continuing education PBL settings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1609
  80. *Roderick, I. (2024). Misrepresenting autism in university promotional videos advocating robot therapy: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Social Semiotics, 34(5), 826-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2207477
  81. *Ruesch, J. M., & Sarvary, M. A. (2025). Instructors as communication strategists: Using multimodal communication to implement a new course policy on assignment extension due dates. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1558758
  82. *Sataoen, H. L., Lövgren, D., & Neby, S. (2024). Metaphors of communication professionals in higher education: Between the trivial and significant. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23050206
  83. *Schneider, J., Börner, D., van Rosmalen, P., & Specht, M. (2017). Presentation trainer: What experts and computers can tell about your nonverbal communication. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12175
  84. Sharma, K., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Multimodal data capabilities for learning: What can multimodal data tell us about learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1450-1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12993
  85. *Shirahata, M., Lahti, M., & Siitonen, M. (2025). Language ideologies in a Finnish university student union’s Facebook communication practices. Social Semiotics, 35(1), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2267462
  86. *Spanjaard, D., Garlin, F., & Mohammed, H. (2023). Tell me a story! Blending digital storytelling into marketing higher education for student engagement. Journal of Marketing Education, 45(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753221090419
  87. *Steen, F. F., Hougaard, A., Joo, J., Olza, I., Cánovas, C. P., Pleshakova, A., Ray, S., Uhrig, P., Valenzuela, J., Woźny, J., & Turner, M. (2018). Toward an infrastructure for data-driven multimodal communication research. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0041
  88. *Sumekto, D. R., Dardjito, H., Sukur, S. G., Andriani, Y. S., Olam, R. M., & Sulistyorini, D. A. (2024). Paralinguistic features in students’ storytelling within multimodal communications. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(2), 997-1018. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i2.8701
  89. *Tsai, K.-J. (2025). Concept mapping for enhancing multimodal communication in an EFL classroom. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251368978
  90. *Uyar, G., & Balaman, U. (2024). The role of gazing behaviors in navigating paired role-play interactional competence assessment tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 21(3), 266-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2024.2375651
  91. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  92. *Wang, M. (2022). The cultivation of students’ multiple practical ability under the multimodal blended teaching mode. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(12), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.32087
  93. *Wu, Y. Q., & Cheong, C. Y. M. (2022). Academic visual identity of higher education institutions: A multimodal communication through pictorial representations. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-13
  94. *Xu, Y., & Chen, J. (2025). From multimodal making to meaning: Transmedia storytelling and interdisciplinary assessment in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2582597
  95. *Yang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Application of psychological effects in intelligent digital English teaching based on multimodal low resource language information processing from a psychological perspective. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing, 23(6), Article 85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3599726
  96. *Yao, W., & Saad, M. N. (2026). A model for enhancing screenwriting creativity for media students through a creative system and guided mental imagery strategy. Asian Education and Development Studies, 15(1), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-02-2025-0061
  97. *Younas, M., Ismayil, I., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., Anwar, B., & Noor, U. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of digital scenario-based English teaching at the university level using the artificial intelligence generated content. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1670892
  98. *Yu, S., Androsov, A., & Yan, H. (2025). Exploring the prospects of multimodal large language models for automated emotion recognition in education: Insights from Gemini. Computers & Education, 232, Article 105307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105307
  99. *Zhang, Z., Tan, S., Wignell, P., & O’Halloran, K. (2020). Addressing international students on Australian and Chinese university webpages: A comparative study. Discourse, Context & Media, 36, Article 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100403