Research Article

Modelling leadership capacity for digital curriculum transformation and students’ engagement: A mediated model based on the advanced higher education framework

Khaled Mohammad Alomari 1 * , Ahmed Mahade 2 , Safwan Maghaydah 1 , Abdallah Elmahi 3
More Detail
1 Faculty of Information Technology, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES2 Faculty of HRM, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES3 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), July 2026, ep671, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18903
Published: 01 July 2026
OPEN ACCESS   953 Views   317 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examines how leadership capacity drives digital transformation in higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), guided by the Advance HE (2025) framework for leading in higher education (HE). Using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design supplemented by structured multiple-response items, the authors surveyed 283 academic staff and leaders and analyzed the data with partial least squares-structural equation modelling. Leadership knowledge and digital literacy, leadership values and mindsets, and institutional digital strategies and support significantly predicted faculty willingness to adopt technology. Faculty willingness mediated the association between leadership capacity and digital curriculum transformation, which in turn related to stronger student engagement and learning outcomes. Structured section 8 responses highlighted workload pressures, infrastructure constraints, and data-privacy concerns, as well as the importance of vision-led leadership and sustained institutional support. The findings suggest that sustainable digital transformation depends less on technology availability alone than on coherent leadership, faculty readiness, and curriculum-centered reform. The study offers practical implications for aligning governance, professional development, and policy in UAE HE.
Keywords: digital transformation, leadership, faculty willingness, curriculum innovation, advance HE framework, UAE

CITATION (APA)

Alomari, K. M., Mahade, A., Maghaydah, S., & Elmahi, A. (2026). Modelling leadership capacity for digital curriculum transformation and students’ engagement: A mediated model based on the advanced higher education framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), ep671. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18903

REFERENCES

  1. Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & García, G. R. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12052107
  2. Abbu, H., Mugge, P., & Gudergan, G. (2022). Successful digital leadership requires building trust: For companies to excel in the new, rapidly changing innovation environment, their leaders must focus on trust. Research Technology Management, 65(5), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2022.2095168
  3. Abbu, H., Mugge, P., Gudergan, G., & Kwiatkowski, A. (2020). DIGITAL LEADERSHIP – Character and competency differentiates digitally mature organizations. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198576
  4. Aditya, B. R., Ferdiana, R., & Kusumawardani, S. S. (2022a). A barrier diagnostic framework in process of digital transformation in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2020-0454
  5. Aditya, B. R., Ferdiana, R., & Kusumawardani, S. S. (2022b). Identifying and prioritizing barriers to digital transformation in higher education: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3-4), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2020-0262
  6. Advance HE. (2025). Framework for leading in higher education. Advance HE. https://advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/framework-leading-higher-education
  7. Albashiry, N. M., Belhadj, H., & Al-Smadi, M. (2024). A digital competency framework for university teachers: Towards agile and sustainable curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (pp. 1490-1494). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459701
  8. Alomari, K. M., Maghaydah, S., & Khan, M. J. (2025). Examining metaverse intention to use among computer science and engineering students via UTAUT2, DOI through PLS-SEM, ML & network analysis. SN Computer Science, 6, Article 983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-025-04553-6
  9. Alomari, K. M., Maghaydah, S., Salloum, S. A., Mahade, A., & Abubakr, A. A. M. (2026). Understanding metaverse adoption and sustainability across students and educators: Evidence from the diffusion of innovation model. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 21, Article 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2026.100307
  10. Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Associations between traditional and digital leadership in academic environment: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2021-01286
  11. Anwar, S., & Saraih, U. N. (2024). Digital leadership in the digital era of education: Enhancing knowledge sharing and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(6), 1581-1611. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2023-0540
  12. Arnaud, J., São Mamede, H., & Branco, F. (2024). The relationship between digital transformation and digital literacy – An explanatory model: Systematic literature review. F1000Research 2024, 13(253). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146991.1
  13. Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
  14. Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
  15. Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Digital leadership. In S. Bresciani, A. Ferraris, M. Romano, & G. Santoro (Eds.), Digital transformation management for agile organizations: A compass to sail the digital world (pp. 97-115). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-171-320211006
  16. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers and Education, 182, Article 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2022.104463
  17. Carvalho, A., Alves, H., & Leitão, J. (2022). What research tells us about leadership styles, digital transformation and performance in state higher education? International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0514
  18. Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), Article 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/S20113291
  19. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
  20. Djarwati Muljani, B., Nayati Utami, H., Prasetya, A., Nugroho Luthfi Imam Fahrudi, A., Brawijaya, U., & Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, U. (2025). Digital leadership in higher education institutions: A conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Public Administration and Governance. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2024.2354734
  21. Fernández, A., Beatriz Gómez, Kleona Binjaku, Elinda, & Meçe, K. (2023). Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: A multivocal literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12351-12382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0
  22. Fowler, S., & Leonard, S. N. (2024). Using design based research to shift perspectives: A model for sustainable professional development for the innovative use of digital tools. Professional Development in Education, 50(1), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1955732
  23. Galvis, Á. H., & Carvajal, D. (2022). Learning from success stories when using eLearning and bLearning modalities in higher education: A meta-analysis and lessons towards digital educational transformation. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00325-X
  24. García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Avoiding the dark side of digital transformation in teaching. an institutional reference framework for eLearning in higher education. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 20237. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042023
  25. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  26. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  27. Jameson, J., Rumyantseva, N., Cai, M., Markowski, M., Essex, R., & McNay, I. (2022). A systematic review and framework for digital leadership research maturity in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEO.2022.100115
  28. Kaputa, V., Loučanová, E., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. A. (2022). Digital transformation in higher education institutions as a driver of social oriented innovations. In C. Păunescu, K. L. Lepik, & N. Spencer (Eds.), Social innovation in higher education. Innovation, technology, and knowledge management (pp. 61-85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_4
  29. Ke, S. (2024). Digital transformation of curriculum based on Tyler rationale. Advances in Humanities and Modern Education Research, 1(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.70114/AHMER.2024.1.1.P84
  30. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101
  31. Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.70725/331114CTNUTJ
  32. Lytras, M. D., Alkhaldi, A., & Malik, S. (2024). Transformative leadership [TL] and sustainable innovation in higher education [HE]: Setting the context. In S. Baroudi, & M. D. Lytras (Eds.), Transformative leadership and sustainable innovation in education: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 211-229). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-536-120241014
  33. Macfarlane, B., Bolden, R., & Watermeyer, R. (2024). Three perspectives on leadership in higher education: Traditionalist, reformist, pragmatist. Higher Education, 88(4), 1381-1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-023-01174-X
  34. Marks, A., AL-Ali, M., Atassi, R., Abualkishik, A. Z., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education: A framework for maturity assessment. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(12), 504-513. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0111261
  35. Miller, C. E. (2021). Leading digital transformation in higher education: A toolkit for technology leaders. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Research anthology on digital transformation, organizational change, and the impact of remote work (pp. 1366-1384). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.CH068
  36. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10739-1
  37. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
  38. Neves, J., & Parkin, D. (2023). Advance HE leadership survey for higher education. Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/leadership-survey-higher-education
  39. Nicolettou, A., Chester, A., & Soulis, S. (2017). A framework for program wide curriculum transformation. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE (pp. 322-327). https://doi.org/10.14742/APUBS.2017.781
  40. Niță, V., & Guțu, I. (2023). The role of leadership and digital transformation in higher education students’ work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5124. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH20065124
  41. Onan, G. (2024). Digital transformation and digital leadership in higher education institutions: Insights from the literature. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 8(2), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.38015/SBYY.1587587
  42. Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2023). Editorial: Educational digital transformation: New technological challenges for competence development. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1267939
  43. Purwanto, H., Rahayu, A., Gaffar, V., Wibowo, L. A., Asmara, M. A., Munawar, A., Saepudin, D., & Edu, H. (2024). Strategic alignment for higher education’s digital transformation journey. TRIKONOMIKA: Jurnal Ekonomi, 23(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.23969/TRIKONOMIKA.V23I2.18940
  44. Rashid, S., Fayez, O., Ismail, H., & Khan, R. F. (2021). Digital social support for undergraduate students during COVID-19: Pivotal support for the digital transformation. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/JPHR.2021.2148
  45. Suryadi, Muslim, A. Q., & Setyono, L. (2024). Exploring the nexus of digital leadership and digital literacy on higher education performance: The role of digital innovation. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.13.1.207
  46. Tiwari, S. P. (2024). Digital transformation framework for higher education: Principles, guidelines, and actionable recommendations. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(9), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.47814/IJSSRR.V7I9.2299
  47. Trevisan, L. V., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Dias, B. G., Filho, W. L., & Pedrozo, E. Á. (2023). Digital transformation towards sustainability in higher education: State-of-the-art and future research insights. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 2789-2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-022-02874-7
  48. Worapongpat, N., Cai, Q., & Wongsawad, T. (2024). Creating and validating a digital leadership model for university teachers, Liaoning Province. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.60027/JELR.2024.740
  49. Yuan, F., & Khan, M. S. (2024). Investigating the impact of digital leadership on innovation performance of public universities in Yunnan, China. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(9), Article 7663. https://doi.org/10.24294/JIPD.V8I9.7663
  50. Zhu, R., Alias, B. S., Hamzah, M. I. M., & Hamid, M. R. A. (2024). A threefold examination of university digital leadership, teacher digital competency, and teacher technology behavior for digital transformation of education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.23.10.13