Research Article

Mechanisms linking self-regulated learning competence to perceived learning effectiveness among pre-service teachers in flipped classrooms

Tieu Thi My Thi Hong 1 , Hoang Thi Thinh 2 * , Hoang Thi Thuan 2 , Nguyen Thi Hanh 2
More Detail
1 Hanoi National University of Education, Hanoi, VIETNAM2 Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), April 2026, ep656, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18543
Published: 10 May 2026
OPEN ACCESS   136 Views   96 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study explains the mechanisms through which self-regulated learning (SRL) competence contributes to perceived learning effectiveness (PLE) among pre-service (PS) teachers in flipped classroom (FC) settings, with particular attention to the sequential mediating roles of student engagement (ENG) and learning satisfaction (SAT). Grounded in SRL and engagement theories, a mediation model linking SRL competence, ENG, SAT, and PLE was proposed and empirically tested in flipped teacher education courses in Vietnam. Data were collected from 1,119 PS teachers across multiple teacher education institutions. Structural equation modeling indicated that SRL competence strongly predicts ENG, while its direct effects on SAT and PLE are comparatively weaker. ENG significantly influences both SAT and PLE, and SAT emerges as the strongest predictor of PLE. Notably, the sequential pathway from SRL competence through engagement and satisfaction represents the most substantial indirect effect in the model, accounting for a large proportion of variance in PLE. These findings suggest that SRL competence enhances learning outcomes primarily by activating engagement and fostering SAT rather than through direct effects alone. The study advances FC research by elucidating the cognitive, behavioral, and affective mechanisms underlying PLE and offers practical implications for designing engaging and satisfying flipped teacher education environments in Vietnam.

CITATION (APA)

Hong, T. T. M. T., Thinh, H. T., Thuan, H. T., & Hanh, N. T. (2026). Mechanisms linking self-regulated learning competence to perceived learning effectiveness among pre-service teachers in flipped classrooms. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), ep656. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18543

REFERENCES

  1. Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
  2. Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2020). Investigating self-regulated learning and academic achievement in an eLearning environment: The case of K-12 flipped classroom. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1835145. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1835145
  3. Alkhalaf, M. (2023). Flipped classroom approach in EFL context: Implementing self-regulated learning to improve students’ performance in use of grammar. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(3), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i3.4869
  4. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
  5. Altas, E. A., & Mede, E. (2020). The impact of flipped classroom approach on the writing achievement and self-regulated learning of pre-service English teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.849885
  6. Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
  7. Balcı, T., Temiz, C. N., & Sivrikaya, A. H. (2021). Transition to distance education in COVID-19 period: Turkish pre-service teachers’ e-learning attitudes and readiness levels. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), Article 296. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v7i1.18508
  8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Flip_Your_Classroom.html?id=-YOZCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
  9. Birova, L., Ruiz-Cecilia, R., & Guijarro-Ojeda, J. R. (2023). Flipped classroom in EFL: A teaching experience with pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1269981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1269981
  10. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
  11. Bosch-Farré, C., Cicres, J., Patiño-Masó, J., Morera Basuldo, P., Toran-Monserrat, P., Lladó Martínez, A., & Malagón-Aguilera, M. D. (2024). Efectividad de la metodología de aula inversa en el ámbito universitario: Una revision sistemática [Effectiveness of the flipped classroom methodology in the university setting: A systematic review]. Educación XX1, 27(1), 19-56. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.35773
  12. Chukwu, C. O., Chukwu, J. C., & Odey, F. A. (2026). AI-powered learning tools on measurement of student engagement across academic disciplines: Implications of age and gender. Educational Point, 3(1), Article e144. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17782
  13. Du, J., Hew, K. F., & Li, L. (2023). Do direct and indirect recommendations facilitate students’ self-regulated learning in flipped classroom online activities? Findings from two studies. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040400
  14. Fisher, R., Tran, Q., & Verezub, E. (2024). Teaching English as a foreign language in higher education using flipped learning/flipped classrooms: A literature review. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2302984
  15. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  16. Galvin, S., & Lucitt, M. (2024). Student learning performance and satisfaction with a flipped classroom in undergraduate dental pharmacology education. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.24308600
  17. Gondal, S. A., Khan, A. Q., Cheema, E. U., & Dehele, I. S. (2024). Impact of the flipped classroom on students’ academic performance and satisfaction in pharmacy education: A quasi-experimental study. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2378246. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2378246
  18. Grab, M. Ö., & Bafralı, G. (2025). Flipped classroom: A case study on the perceived benefits and challenges of flipped learning for ESL teacher candidates. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 10(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1589084
  19. Hampton, D., Welsh, D., & Wiggins, A. T. (2019). Learning preferences and engagement level of Generation Z nursing students. Nurse Educator, 45(3), 160-164. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000710
  20. Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
  21. Jartitngarm, N. (2025). Exploring self-regulated learning and motivational strategies in a flipped classroom: Implications for academic achievement. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 456-492. https://doi.org/10.70730/bzwo9910
  22. Jeong, J. S., Cañada-Cañada, F., & González-Gómez, D. (2018). The study of flipped-classroom for pre-service science teachers. Education Sciences, 8(4), Article 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040163
  23. Jia, C., Hew, K. F., Jiahui, D., & Liuyufeng, L. (2023). Towards a fully online flipped classroom model to support student learning outcomes and engagement: A 2-year design-based study. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, Article 100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100878
  24. Judy Shih, H., & Huang, S. C. (2020). EFL learners’ metacognitive development in flipped learning: A comparative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1448-1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1728343
  25. Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Exploring the role of sociability, sense of community and course satisfaction on students’ engagement in flipped classroom supported by Facebook groups. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(1), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00226-y
  26. Kilavuz, F. (2024). Exploring research trends in the implementation of the flipped classroom model in educational research: A review of literature. Pedagogical Research, 9(3), Article em0216. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14730
  27. Lee, Y., Davis, R., & Li, Y. (2022). Implementing synchronous online flipped learning for pre-service teachers during COVID-19. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 653-661. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.653
  28. Lin, L., Hung, I., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. (2019). The impact of student engagement on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1573-1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9
  29. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: The effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
  30. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Student engagement in mathematics flipped classrooms: Implications of journal publications from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 672610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672610
  31. Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the flipped classroom model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4041-4055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7
  32. Nielsen, K. L. (2023). Why can the flipped classroom frustrate students? Experiences from an engineering mathematics course. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040396
  33. Noguera Fructuoso, I., Robalino Guerra, P. E., & Ahmedi, S. (2023). The flexibility of the flipped classroom for the design of mediated and self-regulated learning scenarios. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 26(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.2.36035
  34. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3
  35. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  36. Rakovic, M., Ahmad Uzir, N., Matcha, W., Eagan, B., Jovanović, J., Williamson Shaffer, D., Pardo, A., & Gašević, D. (2023). Network analytics to unveil links of learning strategies, time management, and academic performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(3), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7843
  37. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12421
  38. Sulistyowati, E., Hukom, J., & Muhtadi, A. (2023). Meta-analysis of flipped classroom on students’ mathematics abilities: Effectiveness and heterogeneity analysis. JTP–Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(2), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i2.27433
  39. Taghizade, A., Azimi, E., Mahmoodian, H., & Akhash, S. (2023). Integrating community of inquiry framework principles with flipped classroom pedagogy to enhance students’ perceived presence sense, self-regulated learning, and learning performance in preservice teacher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 154-173. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7005
  40. Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
  41. Umam, K., Nusantara, T., Parta, I. N., Hidayanto, E., & Mulyono, H. (2019). An application of flipped classroom in mathematics teacher education programme. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(03), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i03.10207
  42. Weiqian, X., Jingran, L., & Jiake, Y. (2024). A study on the correlation between the participation of flipped classroom and the pleasure and boredom of non-English majors in foreign language classroom. Asian Social Science, 20(3), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v20n3p64
  43. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://www.routledge.com/Metacognition-in-Educational-Theory-and-Practice/Hacker-Dunlosky-Graesser/p/book/9780805824827
  44. Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
  45. Yaşar, M. Ö., & Polat, M. (2021). A MOOC-based flipped classroom model: Reflecting on pre-service English language teachers’ experience and perceptions. Participatory Educational Research, 8(4), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.81.8.4
  46. Yoon, S., Kim, S., & Kang, M. (2020). Predictive power of grit, professor support for autonomy and learning engagement on perceived achievement within the context of a flipped classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418762463
  47. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7
  48. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2