Research Article

Identifying barriers faced by university EFL instructors in integrating mobile-assisted language learning

Kate Tzu-Ching Chen 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Applied English, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City, TAIWAN* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), October 2023, ep467, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13621
Published Online: 28 August 2023, Published: 01 October 2023
OPEN ACCESS   1215 Views   793 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to examine the barriers faced by Taiwanese university English as a foreign language (EFL) instructors when incorporating mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) into their teaching, and to explore how these barriers are influenced by the instructors’ background characteristics. To assess the variables, a survey questionnaire was developed and administered to a sample of 350 university instructors. Additionally, interviews were conducted with a subset of instructors to complement and clarify the quantitative data. The findings indicated that university EFL instructors encountered moderate barriers when integrating MALL into their teaching practices. Furthermore, the study identified significant differences in the barriers experienced based on the amount of time instructors dedicated to MALL on a daily basis. Both quantitative and qualitative data highlighted the importance of time as a critical factor for successful MALL integration. As a recommendation, it is advised that university administrators consider reducing instructors’ workload to facilitate the seamless integration of MALL.
Keywords: mobile-assisted language learning, English as a foreign language, barrier, technology integration

CITATION (APA)

Chen, K. T.-C. (2023). Identifying barriers faced by university EFL instructors in integrating mobile-assisted language learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep467. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13621

REFERENCES

  1. Alnujaidi, S. (2021). Adoption of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in Saudi Arabian EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(2), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1202.13
  2. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.015
  3. An, Y.-J., & Williams, K. (2010). Teaching with web 2.0 technologies: Benefits, barriers and lessons learned. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(3), 41-58.
  4. Anaraki, F. B. (2009). A flash-based mobile learning system for learning English as second language. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (pp. 400-404). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCET.2009.183
  5. Boulay, R. A., & Fulford, C. P. (2009). Technology mentoring: Research results across seven campuses. In A. Tatnall, & A. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC 3 World Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 273-281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03115-1_29
  6. Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies–Students’ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027
  7. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8, 136-155.
  8. Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011
  9. Chen, C. M., & Hsu, S. H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 153-180.
  10. Chen, K. T.-C. (2017). Examining EFL instructors’ and students’ perceptions and acceptance toward M-learning in higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(4), 967-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0494-8
  11. Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
  12. Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709
  13. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.046
  14. Chuang, Y.-T. (2017). MEMIS: A mobile-supported English-medium instruction system. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 640-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.007
  15. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
  16. Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12qnw
  17. Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: Orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022535516780
  18. Dye, A., Solstad, B. E., K., & Odingo, J. A. (2003). Mobile education–A glance at the future. NKI Nettstudier. http://nettskolen.nki.no/forskning/mobile_education.pdf
  19. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299597
  20. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504683
  21. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  22. Ertmer, P. A., Paul, A., Molly, L., Eva, R., & Denise, W. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1999.10782269
  23. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
  24. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in US public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  25. Gromik, N. A. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013
  26. Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016
  27. Hao, Y., Lee, K. S., Chen, S.-T., & Sim, S. C. (2019). An evaluative study of a mobile application for middle school students struggling with English vocabulary learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 208-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.013
  28. Hartman, J., Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2000). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: A dependent or independent variable? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(3), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i3.1892
  29. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  30. Hong-Ren, C., & Hui-Ling, H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Design and analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 70-77.
  31. Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Taiwanese high school teachers’ conceptions of mobile learning. Computers & Education, 115, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.013
  32. Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.004
  33. Hu, P. J.-H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by schoolteachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00050-8
  34. Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008
  35. Hwang, G. J., Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2008). A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors. Computers & Education, 51(2), 926-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.011
  36. Hwang, W.-Y., & Chen, H. S. L. (2013). Users’ familiar situational contexts facilitate the practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.639783
  37. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004
  38. Jia, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z., & Ruan, M. (2012). Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers & Education, 58(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.002
  39. Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 581-597.
  40. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
  41. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.002
  42. Lan, K., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K. (2013). From particular to popular: Facilitating EFL mobile-supported cooperative reading. Language Learning and Technology, 17, 23-38.
  43. Liang, W. (2021). University teachers’ technology integration in teaching English as a foreign language: Evidence from a case study in mainland China. SN Social Sciences, 1(8), 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00223-5
  44. Lin, C.-C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004
  45. Lucas, M. (2018). External barriers affecting the successful implementation of mobile educational interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.001
  46. Ma, W. W. K., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00145.x
  47. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
  48. Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802878
  49. Nikolopoulou, K. (2020). Secondary education teachers’ perceptions of mobile phone and tablet use in classrooms: Benefits, constraints and concerns. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00156-7
  50. Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2023). Mobile learning-technology barriers in school education: Teachers’ views. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2121314
  51. Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centered mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.649484
  52. Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L.-M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008
  53. Ryba, K., & Brown, M. E. (2000). How proficient IT teachers integrate computers into the curriculum. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 16(4), 6-11.
  54. Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015
  55. Shuib, L., Shamshirband, S., & Ismail, M. H. (2015). A review of mobile pervasive learning–Applications and issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.002
  56. Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701745817
  57. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
  58. Tai, Y. (2012). Contextualizing a MALL: Practice design and evaluation. Educational Technology and Society, 15(2), 220-230.
  59. Ting, Y.-L. (2013). Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: An intuitive design and its evaluation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.004
  60. Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes toward the use of mobile devices. Computers & Education, 69, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014
  61. Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
  62. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
  63. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Techn’ology, 38(2), 211-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00580.x