Research Article

Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about technology integration: Applying the PBT model in Chinese higher education

Yuncai Liu 1 2 * , Fahainis Bt Mohd Yusof 1
More Detail
1 School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia2 Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, CHINA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), April 2026, ep655, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18533
Published: 07 May 2026
OPEN ACCESS   260 Views   280 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Despite extensive promotion of digital technology as a driver of educational reform, its effective integration depends on teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. However, the beliefs influencing English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ utilization of technology, and the factors underlying them, have not been sufficiently examined, particularly in the Chinese context, where national policies strongly promote the adoption of technology. This qualitative case study, guided by the Pedagogical Beliefs-Technology (PBT) model, examined teachers of College English from four Chinese universities via in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that EFL teachers displayed both teacher-centered beliefs, which perceive technology as a supplemental tool helping alleviate workload and enhance classroom engagement, and student-centered beliefs, which employ it to enrich and update the curriculum, indicating the multidimensionality of pedagogical beliefs. Moreover, individual, institutional, and policy factors further influence these beliefs. This study reveals the interaction between teachers’ beliefs and teaching contexts, further supporting and extending the applicability of the PBT model in exploring technology integration and teacher beliefs. It provides empirical evidence for future research and supplies practical insights for technology integration in EFL higher education.

CITATION (APA)

Liu, Y., & Bt Mohd Yusof, F. (2026). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about technology integration: Applying the PBT model in Chinese higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), ep655. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18533

REFERENCES

  1. Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215-1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
  2. Abedi, E. A., Prestridge, S., & Hodge, S. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in Ghana: A qualitative study of teachers’, headteachers’ and education officials’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5857-5877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12049-0
  3. Abel, V. R., Tondeur, J., & Sang, G. (2022). Teacher perceptions about ICT integration into classroom instruction. Education Sciences, 12(9), Article 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090609
  4. Almerich, G., Gargallo-Jaquotot, P., & Suárez-Rodríguez, J. (2024). ICT integration by teachers: A basic model of ICT use, pedagogical beliefs, and personal and contextual factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, Article 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104617
  5. Bekoe, S. O., Mahama, I., Amoako, B. M., Antwi, T., & Amos, P. M. (2025). Teachers’ characteristics and technological efficacy in applying the standard-based curriculum in Ghana: A mixed-method study. Educational Point, 2(2), Article e138. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17655
  6. Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791
  7. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
  8. Bice, H., & Tang, H. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: A mixed methods study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10179-10205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11044-1
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Bui, T. H. (2022). English teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, Article 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100204
  11. Calafato, R., & Clausen, T. (2024). Vocabulary learning strategies in extramural English gaming and their relationship with vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(8), 1825-1843. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2328023
  12. Chen, K. T.-C. (2024). Examining teachers’ readiness and perception on distance EFL learning in Taiwanese secondary education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep506. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14389
  13. Chen, X., Shu, D., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Investigating in-service foreign language teachers’ beliefs about using information and communication technology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00514-0
  14. Cheng, S.-L., Chang, J.-C., & Romero, K. (2022). Are pedagogical beliefs an internal barrier for technology integration? The interdependent nature of teacher beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5215-5232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10835-2
  15. Cheung, A. (2021). Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of Zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 54(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). SAGE.
  17. Ding, A.-C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Lu, Y.-H., & Glazewski, K. (2019). EFL teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices with regard to using technology. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1537816
  18. Downes, T., Fluck, A., Gibbons, P., Leonard, R., Matthews, C., Oliver, R., Vickers, M., & Williams, M. (2001). Making better connections: Models of teacher professional development for the integration of information and communication technology into classroom practice. Department of Education, Science and Training. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/6289723
  19. Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899
  20. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  21. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
  22. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  23. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  24. Gao, Y., & Cui, Y. (2024). English as a foreign language teachers’ pedagogical beliefs about teacher roles and their agentic actions amid and after COVID-19: A case study. RELC Journal, 55(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221074110
  25. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  26. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
  27. Hol, D., & Aydın, I. (2020). Is technology in our classrooms? EFL teachers’ beliefs and engagement with technology in the classroom. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i2.17326
  28. Huang, F., & Teo, T. (2020). Influence of teacher-perceived organisational culture and school policy on Chinese teachers’ intention to use technology: An extension of technology acceptance model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1547-1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09722-y
  29. Huang, F., & Teo, T. (2021). Examining the role of technology-related policy and constructivist teaching belief on English teachers’ technology acceptance: A study in Chinese universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13027
  30. Huang, F., Qi, J., & Xie, A. (2022). Sustaining teaching with technology after the quarantine: Evidence from Chinese EFL teachers’ technological, pedagogical and content knowledge. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148774
  31. Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2019). Factors affecting Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ technology acceptance: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746168
  32. Lestarina, A. P., Nurkamto, J. N., & Ngadiso, N. N. (2022). EFL teachers’ beliefs and ICT integration practices during distance learning: Employing replacement, amplification, and transformation framework. Register Journal, 15(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i1.91-108
  33. Levin, B. B. (2014). The development of teachers’ beliefs. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 60–77). Routledge.
  34. Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology use elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003
  35. Liang, W. (2021). University teachers’ technology integration in teaching English as a foreign language: Evidence from a case study in mainland China. SN Social Sciences, 1(8), Article 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00223-5
  36. Lin, C.-Y., Huang, C.-K., & Chen, C.-H. (2014). Barriers to the adoption of ICT in teaching Chinese as a foreign language in US universities. ReCALL, 26(1), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000268
  37. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. https://us2.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/naturalistic-inquiry
  38. Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.001
  39. Marchlik, P., Wichrowska, K., & Zubala, E. (2021). The use of ICT by ESL teachers working with young learners during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7107-7131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10556-6
  40. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  41. Mertala, P. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in early childhood education: A meta-ethnographical synthesis of qualitative research. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 334-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.003
  42. MOE. (2020). Guidelines on college English teaching (2020 edition). Higher Education Press.
  43. MOE. (2022). Teachers’ digital literacy (education industry standard). Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/t20230214_1044634.html
  44. Moradi, H. (2025). The role of language teachers’ perceptions and attitudes in ICT integration in higher education EFL classes in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 208. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04524-5
  45. Nagy, J. T., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2024). Factors influencing university teachers’ technological integration. Education Sciences, 14(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010055
  46. Olszewski, B., & Crompton, H. (2020). Educational technology conditions to support the development of digital age skills. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103849
  47. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
  48. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  49. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
  50. Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influence their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
  51. Prestridge, S. (2017). Examining the shaping of teachers’ pedagogical orientation for the use of technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369
  52. Qaddumi, H., Smith, M., Masd, K., Bakeer, A., & Abu-Ulbeh, W. (2023). Investigating Palestinian in-service teachers’ beliefs about the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) into teaching English. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12785-12805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11689-6
  53. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digital competence of educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466
  54. Rød, A. J., & Calafato, R. (2023). Exploring the relationship between extramural English, self-efficacy, gender, and learning outcomes: A mixed-methods study in a Norwegian upper-secondary school. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, Article 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101302
  55. Sackstein, S., Matthee, M., & Weilbach, L. (2023). Theories and models employed to understand the use of technology in education: A hermeneutic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5041-5081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11345-5
  56. Solodka, A., Zaskaleta, S., Moroz, T., & Demianenko, O. (2021). Sheltered instructional observational protocol model in digital teaching EFL students in Ukraine. Arab World English Journal, (1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.2
  57. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
  58. Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971641
  59. Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940
  60. Tondeur, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of teacher education (pp. 1-5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_111-1
  61. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  62. Tuckman, B. W., & Harper, B. E. (2012). Conducting educational research. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216384182
  63. Twining, P. (2008). Framing IT use to enhance educational impact on a school-wide basis. In J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 555-577). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_33
  64. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & Ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x
  65. Waluyo, B., & Apridayani, A. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices on the use of video in English language teaching. Studies in English Language and Education, 8, 726-744. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19214
  66. Wang, J. (2024). In-service teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in English as a foreign language classrooms in China: A multiple-case study. ECNU Review of Education, 7(2), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231193692
  67. Wangdi, T., Dhendup, S., & Gyelmo, T. (2023). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Role of TPACK and facilitating conditions. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 1017-1036. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16254a
  68. Xie, K., Nelson, M. J., Cheng, S.-L., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Examining changes in teachers’ perceptions of external and internal barriers in their integration of educational digital resources in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(2), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1951404
  69. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
  70. Zhang, J. (2023). EFL teachers’ digital literacy: The role of contextual factors in their literacy development. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1153339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153339
  71. Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 696-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666
  72. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807