Research Article

Exploring a Community of Practice to Improve Quality of a Technology Integration Course in a Teacher Education Institution

Olgun Sadik 1 2 *
More Detail
1 Indiana University, USA2 Inonu University, Turkey* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), January 2021, ep285, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8710
OPEN ACCESS   2993 Views   1671 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research was designed and conducted considering the theoretical and practical suggestions of design-based research (DBR) methodology and aimed to identify and address problems in a one-semester technology integration course at a Midwest university in the US. Community of practice (CoP) was used as the theoretical framework in this research to design and implement interventions, and improve the quality of the course. The researcher observed a community of teacher educators and aimed to make suggestions for building successful strategies for communities of practice in similar contexts. The study results showcased the connection between pedagogy, content and technology as an important theme for preparing future teachers in technology integration courses but also in all the teacher education courses. Furthermore, aligned with the previous literature, pre-service teachers’ beliefs and confidence were identified as important conditions for effective technology integration. CoP was found as a challenging but helpful model when all the members share ideas in a supportive and balanced environment. An experienced member of the community acting as a moderator and facilitating the discussions was helpful to address the communication issues in a community of teacher educators.

CITATION (APA)

Sadik, O. (2021). Exploring a Community of Practice to Improve Quality of a Technology Integration Course in a Teacher Education Institution. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), ep285. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8710

REFERENCES

  1. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education, 45(4), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.002
  2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626
  3. Baker, A., & Beames, S. (2016). Good CoP: What makes a community of practice successful? Journal of Learning Design, 9(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i1.234
  4. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  5. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489-542. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_3
  6. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., & Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504948
  7. Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Ke, F. (2017). The relationship among pre-service teachers’ computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.084084
  8. Bogdan, R. (1973). Participant observation. Peabody Journal of Education, 50(4), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619567309537925
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/2634938
  11. Brown, M., & Peck, C. (2018). Expanding the landscape: Developing knowledgeability through communities of practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1473252
  12. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ909933
  13. Coffman, K., Putman, P., Adkisson, A., Kriner, B., & Monaghan, C. (2016). Waiting for the expert to arrive: Using a community of practice to develop the scholarly identity of doctoral students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 30-37. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106332.pdf
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Sage Publications.
  15. Cullen, T. A., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.1.b
  16. Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED426472
  17. Elwood, K., & Savenye, W. (2015). Current tensions: A review of technology integration models utilized by pre-service teacher educator programs. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.
  18. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  19. Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
  20. Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K., & Buss, R. R. (2019). Moving toward a technology infusion approach: Considerations for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1568325
  21. Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803-833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217706736
  22. Gronseth, S., Brush, T., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., T., Strycker, J., Abaci, S., Easterling, W., . . . Leusen, P. V. (2010). Equipping the next generation of teachers: Technology preparation and practice. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784654
  23. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
  24. Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (Shirley Hord, Ed.). New York: Teachers College Press, 5-14.
  25. Jakovljevic, M., & Da Veiga, A. (2020). An integrated academic community of practice model (ACoPM). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1623061
  26. Kilbride, C., Perry, L., Flatley, M., Turner, E., & Meyer, J. (2011). Developing theory and practice: Creation of a community of practice through action research produced excellence in stroke care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.483024
  27. Kluckhohn, F. R. (1940). The participant-observer technique in small communities. American Journal of Sociology, 46(3), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/218650
  28. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  29. Kuhn, T. (2002). Negotiating boundaries between scholars and practitioners: Knowledge, networks, and communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161008
  30. Layman, L., Williams, L., Williams, L., & Slaten, K. (2007). Note to self: make assignments meaningful. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 459-463. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227466
  31. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
  32. Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020
  33. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K., & Newby, T. (2010). Preservice technology integration course revision: A conceptual guide. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5-33. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ896287
  34. Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
  35. Sack, J., Quander, J., Redl, T., & Leveille, N. (2016). The community of practice among mathematics and mathematics education faculty members at an urban minority serving institution in the US. Innovative Higher Education, 41(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9340-9
  36. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9
  37. Sosa, T. (2009). The missing piece of your technology integration course. TechTrends, 53(2), 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0270-1
  38. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  39. Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556
  40. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  41. Trainin, G., Friedrich, L., & Deng, Q. (2018). The impact of a teacher education program redesign on technology integration in elementary preservice teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1198782
  42. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
  43. Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148849
  44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York City: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  45. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  46. Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2008). The evolution of the required educational technology course. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784611
  47. Willis, J., & Cifuentes, L. (2005). Training teachers to integrate technology into the classroom curriculum: Online versus face-to-face course delivery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 43-63. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4404/
  48. Zipke, M. (2018). Preparing teachers to teach with technology: Examining the effectiveness of a course in educational technology. The New Educator, 14(4), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2017.1401191