Review Article

Do digital serious games in collaborative settings promote learning and psychosocial skills? A systematic review

Isabella Giacchi 1 * , Antonia Lonigro 2 , Federica Zava 1 , Giovanni Maria Vecchio 1
More Detail
1 Department of Education, Roma Tre University, Rome, ITALY2 Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ITALY* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), April 2026, ep659, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18599
Published: 25 May 2026
OPEN ACCESS   117 Views   77 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Digital serious games (DSGs) in collaborative settings are increasingly explored for their potential to support 21st century skills, particularly collaboration. However, existing literature still offers a fragmented picture of their impact on collaborative competences. Thus, this study aims to (1) map empirical research on DSGs in collaborative contexts—highlighting theoretical frameworks, application fields, and assessment methods for knowledge acquisition and psychosocial skills—and (2) examine their effectiveness, identifying which components of collaborative competence and group dynamics are supported. Following PRISMA guidelines, the literature search identified 29 studies reporting empirical evidence on the use of DSGs in collaborative settings, using the search terms “serious game*” AND “learning” AND “cooperat*” OR “collaborat*.” The studies selected are highly heterogeneous in frameworks, aims and methods, reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of DSG research. Main findings show that research on DSGs in collaborative contexts is highly heterogeneous and predominantly based on experimental and quasi-experimental designs, with a strong focus on short-term outcomes such as knowledge acquisition and user satisfaction. Results indicate also that DSGs mainly support collaboration through interconnected cognitive, affective, and social mechanisms, particularly when embedded within structured frameworks such as computer-supported collaborative learning. However, evidence on longitudinal effects and deeper group processes remains limited, revealing a gap between short-term learning outcomes and the analysis of sustained group dynamics. Future research on DSG interventions aiming to more effectively capture group processes should adopt standardized definitions, use validated instruments for assessing collaboration, and implement longitudinal designs grounded in structured collaborative methodologies.
Keywords: digital serious games, collaboration, systematic review, learning outcomes, psychosocial skills

CITATION (APA)

Giacchi, I., Lonigro, A., Zava, F., & Vecchio, G. M. (2026). Do digital serious games in collaborative settings promote learning and psychosocial skills? A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), ep659. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18599

REFERENCES

  1. *The studies included in the systematic review are indicated by an asterisk preceding the citation.
  2. Albuquerque, I., Matos, M., Cunha, M., Galhardo, A., Palmeira, L., & Lima, M. (2019). Emotional climate in the classroom scale–Children (ECCS–C) [Unpublished instrument]. University of Coimbra.
  3. Altomari, N., & Valenti, A. (2023). Gamification as a tool for learning and assessment of soft skills at school. Form@re–Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 23(1), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.36253/form-13765
  4. *Andreoli, R., Corolla, A., Faggiano, A., Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., Ranaldi, M., Santangelo, G., & Scarano, V. (2017). A framework to design, develop, and evaluate immersive and collaborative serious games in cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 11(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064644
  5. Andrews-Todd, J., & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, Article 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025
  6. Bergeron, B. (2006). Developing serious games. Thomson Delmar Learning.
  7. *Bossavit, B., & Parsons, S. (2018). Outcomes for design and learning when teenagers with autism codesign a serious game: A pilot study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12242
  8. Breuer, J., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6111
  9. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189-194). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  10. *Buchinger, D., & da Silva Hounsell, M. (2018). Guidelines for designing and using collaborative-competitive serious games. Computers & Education, 118, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.007
  11. *Calabor, M., Mora, A., & Moya, S. (2018). Acquisition of competencies with serious games in the accounting field: An empirical analysis. Revista de Contabilidad, 21(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2016.11.001
  12. *Capatina, A., Bleoju, G., Rancati, E., & Hoareau, E. (2018). Tracking precursors of learning analytics over serious game team performance ranking. Behavior & Information Technology, 37(10-11), 1008-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1474949
  13. Carenys, J., & Moya, S. (2016). Digital game-based learning in accounting and business education. Accounting education, 25(6), 598-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1241951
  14. CASEL. (2015). CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs–Middle and high school edition. Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org/
  15. Cesareni, D., & Cacciamani, S. (2015). Role taking and conversational functions in a blended university course. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 23(3), 139-147. https://ijet.itd.cnr.it/index.php/td/article/view/814
  16. Chai, H., Hu, T., & Wu, L. (2024). Computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving skills: A systematic review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 43, Article 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100591
  17. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper-Row.
  19. *Cuccurullo, S., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2013). A 3D serious city building game on waste disposal. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 11(4), 112-135. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2013100108
  20. *D’Aprile, G., Di Bitonto, P., De Asmundis, R., & Ulloa Severino, A. (2015). Social, constructivist and informal learning processes: Together on the edge for designing digital game-based learning environments. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 23-39. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/151923/
  21. Dan, N. N., Trung, L. T. B. T., Nga, N. T., & Dung, T. M. (2024). Digital game-based learning in mathematics education at the primary school level: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), Article em2423. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14377
  22. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  23. *de Beer, E. E., Groeneveld, S. S., & Jukema, J. S. J. (2023). Perceived contribution of a hybrid serious game to the development of collaborative problem solving among undergraduate nursing students: A mixed method design. Nurse Education in Practice, 73, Article 103794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103794
  24. *Den Haan, R. J., van der Voort, M. C., Baart, F., Berends, K. D., Van den Berg, M. C., Straatsma, M. W., Geenen A. J. P., & Hulscher, S. J. M. H. (2020). The virtual river game: Gaming using models to collaboratively explore river management complexity. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, Article 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104855
  25. Din, S. U., Baig, M. Z., & Khan, M. K. (2023). Serious games: An updated systematic literature review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.03098
  26. Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238444705_Educational_Video_Game_Design_A_Review_of_the_Literature
  27. Driscoll, M. P., & Vergara, A. (1997). Nuevas tecnologías y su impacto en la educación del futuro [New technologies and their impact on the education of the future]. Pensamiento Educativo, 21, 81-99. https://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/pel/article/view/24589
  28. Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735-745). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59
  29. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  30. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  31. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research, 1, 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731
  32. Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
  33. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607
  34. Georgiou, K., Gouras, A., & Nikolaou, I. (2019). Gamification in employee selection: The development of a gamified assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(2), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12240
  35. Gjeraa, K., Spanager, L., Konge, L., Peterson, R. H., & Østergaard, D. (2016). Non-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery team: A systematic review. Surgical Endoscopy, 30, 5185-5199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4890-1
  36. *Goumopoulos, C., Skikos, G., & Frounta, M. (2023). Feasibility and effects of cognitive training with the Cogniplat game platform in elderly with mild cognitive impairment: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Games for Health Journal, 12(5), 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0029
  37. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
  38. Hamalainen, R., Manninen, T., Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2006). Learning to collaborate: Designing collaboration in a 3-D game environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.12.004
  39. Helmreich, R. (1990). Reinforcing and evaluating crew resource management: Evaluator/LOS instructor reference manual. NASA.
  40. Holt, S., & Yuill, N. (2014). Facilitating other-awareness in low-functioning children with autism and typically-developing preschoolers using dual control technology. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(1), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1868-x
  41. *Hummel, H. G., Geerts, W., Slootmaker, A., Kuipers, D., & Westera, W. (2015). Collaboration scripts for mastership skills: Online game about classroom dilemmas in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 670-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.789063
  42. *Hummel, H. G., Van Houcke, J., Nadolski, R. J., Van der Hiele, T., Kurvers, H., & Löhr, A. (2011). Scripted collaboration in serious gaming for complex learning: Effects of multiple perspectives when acquiring water management skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1029-1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01122.x
  43. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1994). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  44. *Jouan, J., De Graeuwe, M., Carof, M., Baccar, R., Bareille, N., Bastian, S., Brogna, D., Burgio, G., Couvreur, S., Cupial, M., Dumont, B., Jacquot, A.-L., Magagnoli, S., Makulska, J., Maréchal, K., Pérès, G., Ridier, A., Salou, T., Tombarkiewicz, B., ... Godinot, O. (2020). Learning interdisciplinarity and systems approaches in agroecology: experience with the serious game SEGAE. Sustainability, 12(11), 4351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114351
  45. Kagan, S., Comoglio, M., & Angeloni, B. (2000). L’apprendimento cooperativo: L’approccio strutturale [Cooperative learning: The structural approach]. Edizioni Lavoro.
  46. Kara, N. (2021). A systematic review of the use of serious games in science education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), Article ep295. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9608
  47. Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1-31). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch001
  48. Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9418-1
  49. Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance & Instruction, 26(9-10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4160260902
  50. Keller, J. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 6(2), 79-104. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A5%3A12225669/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A34393165&crl=c&link_origin=www.google.com
  51. Kleba, M. E., & Wendausen, A. (2009). Empoderamento: Processo de fortalecimento dos sujeitos nos espaços de participaç ao social e democratizaç ao política [Empowerment: The process of strengthening individuals within spaces of social participation and political democratization]. Saúde Social, 18(4), 733-743. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902009000400016
  52. Kong, Q., Wong, N., & Lam, C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15, 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217366
  53. Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & Von Korflesch, H. F. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, Article 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963
  54. Laamarti, F., Eid, M., & El Saddik, A. (2014). An overview of serious games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/358152
  55. Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040
  56. Launiala, A. (2009). How much can a KAP survey tell us about people’s knowledge, attitudes and practices? Some observations from medical anthropology research on malaria in pregnancy in Malawi, Anthropology Matters, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22582/am.v11i1.31
  57. Lim-Fei, V., Woo, H. M., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Serious games to develop social and emotional learning in students. In T. Marsh, M. Ma, M. Oliveira, J. Baalsrud Hauge, & S. Göbel (Eds.), Serious games. JCSG 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9894 (pp. 3-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45841-0_1
  58. *Luz, S., Masoodian, M., Cesario, R. R., & Cesario, M. (2016). Using a serious game to promote community- based awareness and prevention of neglected tropical diseases. Entertainment Computing, 15, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2015.11.001
  59. *Malegiannaki, I. A., Daradoumis, T., & Retalis, S. (2020). Teaching cultural heritage through a narrative-based game. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 13(4), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3414833
  60. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and Instruction: Volume 3: Conative and affective process analyses: Vol. 1987 (pp. 221-253). Erlbaum.
  61. Martí-Parreño, J., Galbis-Córdova, A., & Currás-Pérez, R. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs about gamification and competencies development: A concept mapping approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1683464
  62. Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. H. Wilder Foundation.
  63. *Meij, H., Veldkamp, S., & Leemkuil, H. (2020). Effects of scripting on dialogues, motivation and learning outcomes in serious games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12851
  64. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, Article e1000097 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  65. Nazry, N. N. M., & Romano, D. M. (2017). Mood and learning in navigation-based serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 596-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.040
  66. *Nicolaidou, I., Antoniades, A., Constantinou, R., Marangos, C., Kyriacou, E., Bamidis, P., Dafli, E., & Pattichis, C. S. (2015). A virtual emergency telemedicine serious game in medical training: A quantitative, professional feedback-informed evaluation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), Article e150. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3667
  67. OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
  68. OECD. (2019). Assessing students’ social and emotional skills through triangulation of assessment methods. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/assessing-students-social-and-emotional-skills-through-triangulation-of-assessment-methods_717ad7f2-en.html
  69. *Oksanen, K., & Hämäläinen, R. (2013). Perceived sociability and social presence in a collaborative serious game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 3(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2013010103
  70. Oliveri, M. E., Lawless, R., & Molloy, H. (2017). A literature review on collaborative problem solving for college and workforce readiness. ETS Research Report Series, 2017, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12133
  71. *Oo, A. M., & Vallabhajosyula, R. (2023). Perceived effectiveness of an innovative mobile-based serious game on the improvement of soft skills in minimally invasive surgical training. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 16(1), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13115
  72. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  73. Parsons, S. (2015). Learning to work together: Designing a multi-user virtual reality game for social collaboration and perspective-taking for children with autism. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 6, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.002
  74. Parsons, S., & Cobb, S. (2014). Reflections on the role of the ‘users’: Challenges in a multi-disciplinary context of learner-centred design for children on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.890584
  75. Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R. (2012). Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. Applied Ergonomics, 43(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009
  76. *Pellas, N. (2014). Exploring interrelationships among high school students’ engagement factors in introductory programming courses via a 3D multi-user serious game created in open sim. JUCS–Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(12), 1608-1628. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-020-12-1608
  77. *Perry, B. (2021). Gamified mobile collaborative location-based language learning. Frontiers in Education, 6. Article 689599. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.689599
  78. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
  79. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
  80. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). QCM: A questionnaire to assess current motivation in learning situations. Diagnostica, 47(2), 57-66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247398603_FAM_Ein_Fragebogen_zur_Erfassung_aktuller_Motivation_in_Lern-_und_Leistungssituationen
  81. Rocha, J. B., Mascarenhas, S., & Prada, R. (2008). Game mechanics for cooperative games. In Proceedings of the ZON Digital Games (pp. 72-80).
  82. *Romero, M., & Usart, M. (2013). The impact of students’ temporal perspectives on time-on-task and learning performance in game based learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 3(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2013010106
  83. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  84. *Saitua-Iribar, A., Corral-Lage, J., & Peña-Miguel, N. (2020). Improving knowledge about the sustainable development goals through a collaborative learning methodology and serious game. Sustainability, 12(15), Article 6169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156169
  85. Salen, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
  86. *Sánchez, J., & Olivares, R. (2011). Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1943-1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.012
  87. *Sánchez, J., Mendoza, C., Salinas, A. (2009). Mobile serious games for collaborative problem solving. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,144, 193–197 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-017-9-193
  88. Sánchez, J. (2001). Aprendizaje visible, tecnología invisible [Visible learning, invisible technology]. Dolmen Ediciones.
  89. Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in formal and informal education between potentialities and reality. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 20(1), 4-10. https://ijet.itd.cnr.it/index.php/td/article/view/174
  90. Sisson, L. (2011). Examining the attitudes and outcomes of students enrolled in a developmental mathematics course at a central Florida community college, graduate school [PhD thesis, University of South Florida]. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/3348/
  91. *Terzidou, T., Tsiatsos, T., Miliou, C., & Sourvinou, A. (2016). Agent supported serious game environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2521649
  92. Van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00019-6
  93. van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
  94. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
  95. Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9017-0
  96. Wang, C., & Huang, L. (2021). A systematic review of serious games for collaborative learning: Theoretical framework, game mechanic and efficiency assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(6), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i06.18495
  97. *Wendel, V., Gutjahr, M., Göbel, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2013). Designing collaborative multiplayer serious games: Escape from Wilson Island—A multiplayer 3D serious game for collaborative learning in teams. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9244-6
  98. Weiss, P. L., Gal, E., Zancanaro, M., Giusti, L., Cobb, S., Millen, L., & Eden, S. (2011). Usability of technology supported social competence training for children on the autism spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2011.5971867
  99. *Wong, J. Y. H., Ko, J., Nam, S., Kwok, T., Lam, S., Cheuk, J., & Wai, A. K. C. (2022). Virtual ER, a serious game for interprofessional education to enhance teamwork in medical and nursing undergraduates: Development and evaluation study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(3), Article e35269. https://doi.org/10.2196/35269
  100. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001
  101. Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
  102. *Xavier, A., Vagos, P., Palmeira, L., Menezes, P., Patrão, B., Mendes, S. A., & Tavares, M. (2023). The me and the us of emotions: A cluster-randomized controlled trial of the feasibility and efficacy of a compassion-based social-emotional learning program for children. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Article 1196457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196457
  103. Yoo, S. J., & Pyon, H. T. (2026). Is digital inclination associated with lifelong learning in aging South Korea? Educational Point, 3(1), Article e145. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17846
  104. Zhonggen, Y. (2019). A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4797032
  105. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham. C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media.
  106. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271