Research Article

Digital competence of Thai EFL pre-service teachers: Perceptions, classroom integration, and influencing factors

Sasithida Saraiwang 1 , Kusuma Pitukwong 1 *
More Detail
1 Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, Nakhon Pathom, THAILAND* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), July 2026, ep669, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18869
Published: 29 June 2026
OPEN ACCESS   1081 Views   512 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Effective digital competence and technology integration have become increasingly important for English as a foreign language (EFL) pre-service teachers (PSTs); however, they often confront various challenges, especially in the practical usage of digital technology in class. The purposes of this study were to investigate the levels of perceived digital competence of Thai EFL PSTs, to explore their digital integration in actual classroom practice, and to examine the factors contributing to their digital competence. Self-assessment questionnaires administered to 32 Thai EFL PSTs revealed a marked contrast between the highest- and lowest-rated items within the personal-ethical dimension. In classroom observations, most PSTs demonstrated a developing level of digital competence. Multimedia creation was rated at the expert level, ranking highest among the observed areas of technology integration. Lastly, the findings from semi-structured interviews revealed that supportive factors influencing their digital competence were contextual enablers, technological familiarity, personal behavior, and mentorship/peer support. In contrast, challenging factors involved institutional support, personal behaviors, insufficient digital skills, inadequate ongoing training, and difficulties in student-technology interaction. These findings emphasize the importance of a supportive school ICT culture and tiered training programs for PSTs, ranging from beginner to advanced levels, to promote digitally competent, confident, and innovative PSTs who are fully prepared for the dynamic demands of modern education.
Keywords: teacher digital competence, EFL pre-service teachers, technology integration, personal-ethical competencies, personal-professional competencies

CITATION (APA)

Saraiwang, S., & Pitukwong, K. (2026). Digital competence of Thai EFL pre-service teachers: Perceptions, classroom integration, and influencing factors. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(3), ep669. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18869

REFERENCES

  1. Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st century skills: Understanding the depth and width of the challenges to shape proactive teacher education programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), Article 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097365
  2. Almithqal, E. A., & John, T. (2025). Exploring Jordanian university lecturers’ TPACK knowledge: Integrating ICT for teaching English pronunciation. Pedagogical Research, 10(1), Article 0227. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15588
  3. Alshehri, M. (2025). Experiences and perceptions of Saudi EFL teachers on professional development in technology integration into teaching. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 5(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-09-2024-0058
  4. Althubyani, A. R. (2024). Digital competence of teachers and the factors affecting their competence level: A nationwide mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 16(7), Article 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072796
  5. Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, Article 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
  6. Aydin, M. K., Yildirim, T., & Kus, M. (2024). Teachers’ digital competences: A scale construction and validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356573
  7. Bekoe, S. O., Mahama, I., Amoako, B. M., Antwi, T., & Amos, P. M. (2025). Teachers’ characteristics and technological efficacy in applying the standard-based curriculum in Ghana: A mixed-method study. Educational Point, 2(2), Article e138. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17655
  8. Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093
  9. Cao, J., Bhuvaneswari, G., Arumugam, T., & Aravind, B. R. (2023). The digital edge: Examining the relationship between digital competency and language learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187909
  10. Cendani, I. A. S. A., & Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2023). Exploring challenges of peer feedback in an EFL micro teaching class. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 5(3), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i3.15651
  11. Chiu, T. K. F., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W. L., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, Article 105017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105017
  12. Chu, J., Lin, R., Qin, Z., Chen, R., Lou, L., & Yang, J. (2023). Exploring factors influencing pre-service teacher’s digital teaching competence and the mediating effects of data literacy: Empirical evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 508. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02016-y
  13. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of pre K-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  15. Demissie, E. B., Labiso, T. O., & Thuo, M. W. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies and technology integration in education: Insights from secondary schools in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), Article 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100355
  16. Dias-Trindade, S., & Ferreira, A. G. (2020). Digital teaching skills: DigCompEdu CheckIn as an evolution process from literacy to digital fluency. Revista de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 18(2), 162-187. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i2.1519
  17. Dias-Trindade, S., Moreira, J. A., Huertas, J. G. G., Pintado, P. G., & Miguel, A. M. (2023). Teachers’ digital competences in higher education in Portugal and Spain. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep463. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13604
  18. Eslit, E. R. (2023). 21st century teaching: Updates, challenges, and best practices. St. Michael’s College. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21864.65284
  19. Fadillah, R., & Purnawarman, A. A. (2024). The use of cell phones in accessing social media by students during learning process in English classroom. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 13(2), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v13i2.14398
  20. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Education Technology Research & Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
  21. Fang, Z. (2024). Research on the impact of education funding on education digitalization. In Z. Zhan, S. H. Halili, & R. A. Razak (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Technology and Educational Informatization. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-11-2023.2343632
  22. Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
  23. Fenández, C. J. O. (2020). Special session—XR education 21th: Are we ready for XR disruptive ecosystems in education? In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (pp. 424-426). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN47897.2020.9155215
  24. Foster, N. (2023). Teacher digital competences: Formal approaches to their development. In S. Vincent-Lancrin (Ed.), OECD digital education outlook 2023. Towards an effective digital education ecosystem (pp. 179-208). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
  25. Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., & Álvarez-García, F. J. (2020). A study on the actual use of digital competence in the practicum of education degree. Technology Knowledge Learning, 25, 667-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9390-z
  26. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  27. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
  28. Holm, P. (2025). Impact of digital literacy on academic achievement: Evidence from an online anatomy and physiology course. E-Learning and Digital Media, 22(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241232489
  29. International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE standards for educators: A guide for teachers and other professionals. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
  30. Jimarkon, P., Wanphet, P., & Dikilitas, K. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ digital experiences through digital pedagogical practices in Norway. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 5(4), 86-103. http://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4230
  31. Kaçar, I. G. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers as digital material designers: A case study into the TPACK development in the Turkish context. Teaching English with Technology, 22(3-4), 107-130.
  32. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176-198.
  33. Marais, E. (2023). The development of digital competencies in pre-service teachers. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(3), 134-154. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.28
  34. Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2024). Technology acceptance model: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), TheoryHub book (pp. 244-262). Newcastle University Press.
  35. McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2021). Exploring the digital competence of pre-service teachers on entry onto an initial teacher education programme in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1800501
  36. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  37. Mohammadpour, E., & Maroofi, Y. (2025). The disparity between performance-based and self-reported measures of TPACK: Implications for teacher education and professional development. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, Article 100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100554
  38. Moorhouse, B. L., & Yan, L. (2023). Use of digital tools by English language schoolteachers. Education Sciences, 13(3), Article 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030226
  39. Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Llorente-Cejudo, C., Lucas, M., & Bem-Haja, P. (2025). Macroevaluación de la competencia digital docente. Estudio DigCompEdu en España y Portugal [Macro-assessment of teachers’ digital competence. DigCompEdu study in Spain and Portugal]. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(1), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.1.41379
  40. Pérez-Navío, E., Ocaña-Moral, M. T., & Martínez-Serrano, M. d. C. (2021). University graduate students and digital competence: Are future secondary school teachers digitally competent? Sustainability, 13(15), Article 8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158519
  41. Phan, Q.-N., & Nguyen, Q.-T. (2024). Reflective teaching: Voices from Vietnamese pre-service EFL teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 34(2), 666-681.
  42. Pitukwong, K., & Saraiwang, S. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students’ writing. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep519. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14808
  43. Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Hippasus. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
  44. Rodafinos, A., Barkoukis, V., Tzafilkou, K., Ourda, D., Economides, A., & Perifanou, M. (2024). Exploring the impact of digital competence and technology acceptance on academic performance in physical education and sports science students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.28945/5309
  45. Sakhieva, R. G., Grishnova, E. E., Zhukova, M. A., Sokolova, E. G., Lapidus, N. I., & Khlusyanov, O. V. (2025). Use and adoption of ICTs oriented to university student learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), Article ep604. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17429
  46. Saraiwang, S., & Worawong, K. (2023). The use of task-based and game-based learning in English learning at small primary schools in Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. PASAA, 67, 101-138. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.67.1.4
  47. Sarva, E., Lāma, G., Olesika, A., Daniela, L., & Rubene, Z. (2023). Development of education field student digital competences—Student and stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 9895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139895
  48. Scheel, L., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2022). The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students’ acceptance of digital learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w
  49. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
  50. Tomczyk, Ł. (2021). Declared and real level of digital skills of future teaching staff. Education Sciences, 11(10), Article 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100619
  51. Tomczyk, Ł. (2024). Digital competence among pre-service teachers: A global perspective on curriculum change as viewed by experts from 33 countries. Evaluation and Program Planning, 105, Article 102449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102449
  52. van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
  53. Wild, S., & Heuling, L. S. (2020). How do the digital competences of students in vocational schools differ from those of students in cooperative higher education institutions in Germany? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 12, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-020-00091-y
  54. Yang, L., García-Holgado, A., & Martínez-Abad, F. (2023). Digital competence of K-12 pre-service and in-service teachers in China: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09888-4
  55. Zhao, Y., Gómez, M. C. S., Llorente, A. M. P., & Zhao, L. (2021). Digital competence in higher education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 12184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112184
  56. Zheng, Q., Yuan, Z., & Pan, X. (2024). Examining the influencing effect of EFL students’ digital literacy on their online learning power: The mediating role of perceived teacher support. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2404669