Research Article

Bridging the digital divide: Promoting inclusive education for students with disabilities in Ethiopian schools

Merih Welay Welesilassie 1 2 * , Berhane Gerencheal 2 , Seifu Berihu 2
More Detail
1 University of Szeged, Szeged, HUNGARY2 Aksum University, Aksum, ETHIOPIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), October 2025, ep605, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17452
Published: 26 November 2025
OPEN ACCESS   329 Views   342 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Digital inclusion is crucial for providing equitable educational opportunities for students with disabilities. However, significant barriers remain prevalent in low-resource contexts. This study is a beacon of understanding, examining the acceptance, perceptions, and obstacles related to educational technology engagement among young Ethiopian students with physical disabilities. Utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 87 students, followed by in-depth interviews with 12 participants to gain deeper insights into their experiences. The results indicated a strong acceptance and perceived usefulness of digital tools for promoting independent learning and productivity. Nevertheless, students encountered substantial challenges, including a lack of digital readiness support, inadequate infrastructure, high costs, and insufficient teacher training. Structural equation modeling analysis revealed that digital readiness support, acceptance, and trust were significant predictors of students’ willingness to adopt digital technologies. Qualitative findings further illuminated socio-cultural barriers, such as stigma and social exclusion, which hinder effective digital engagement. Utilizing the technology acceptance model in conjunction with the digital divide theory, the findings of this study provide significant insights into the challenges of digital access in Ethiopian educational institutions. The proposed inclusive framework seeks to address critical infrastructural and cultural barriers, thereby promoting equity for students with disabilities. This research underscores the importance of developing and implementing strategies that enhance digital accessibility and inclusion within the educational landscape.
Keywords: digital inclusion, students with disabilities, technology acceptance model, digital divide theory, inclusive education

CITATION (APA)

Welesilassie, M. W., Gerencheal, B., & Berihu, S. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Promoting inclusive education for students with disabilities in Ethiopian schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), ep605. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17452

REFERENCES

  1. Abdul-Kareem, A. K., & Oladimeji, K. A. (2024). Cultivating the digital citizen: Trust, digital literacy and e-government adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2023-0196
  2. Abebe, S. M., Shitu, K., Liulseged, T., Abera, M., Fentie, M., Mekonnen, F., Batorowicz, B., Xu, X., Efedi, N. A., & Aldersey, H. M. (2023). Understanding barriers and facilitators to inclusive education for grade 7–9 students with disabilities in Ethiopia and Ghana: A qualitative study. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development, 34(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.20372/dcidj.671
  3. Burningham, O., Chen, A., Genovesi, E., Belay, W., Ahmed, I., Ayele, M., Girma, F., Lakew, L. T., Hanlon, C., & Hoekstra, R. A. (2024). Inclusive education for children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia: Stakeholder views on benefits, disadvantages and priorities for action. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06549-2
  4. Choi, B., & Ji, S. (2015). Investigating the factors influencing trust in AI-based systems. Information & Management, 52(3), 456–467.
  5. Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust and ethics in AI. AI & Society, 38(2), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01473-4
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  7. Dabi, G. K., & Golga, D. N. (2023). Digital inclusion: Lived experiences of students with visual impairment accessibility to web-based information in higher education institutions of Ethiopia. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(3), 794–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231187558
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739
  10. Franck, B., & Joshi, D. K. (2016). Including students with disabilities in education for all: Lessons from Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1197320
  11. Geleta, A. D. (2019). School principals and teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education in Sebeta Town primary government schools, Sebeta, Ethiopia. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 8(1), 1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2019.0166
  12. Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2021). Conceptualising inclusive education: The role of teacher training and teacher’s attitudes towards inclusion of children with disabilities in Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(9), 1042–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1879958
  13. Hankebo, T. A. (2018). Inclusive education as an approach to reduce inequitable access to education: Exploring the practices of Jegnoch Metasebiya Primary School in Harar Town, Ethiopia. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(2), 123–138.
  14. Hoyos Muñoz, J. A., & Cardona Valencia, D. (2023). Trends and challenges of digital divide and digital inclusion: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Information Science, 51(4), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221148366
  15. Kaarakainen, M. T., & Saikkonen, L. (2023). Remark on digital accessibility: Educational disparities define digital inclusion from adolescence onwards. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(4), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00908-5
  16. Khanlou, N., Khan, A., Vazquez, L. M., & Zangeneh, M. (2020). Digital literacy, access to technology and inclusion for young adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09738-w
  17. Lu, C., Zheng, T., & Huang, R. (2024). Educators’ readiness to adopt AI tools: A framework for analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 45–63.
  18. Manzoor, M., & Vimarlund, V. (2018). Digital technologies for social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Health and Technology, 8(5), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0239-1
  19. Mavrou, K., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Kärki, A., Sallinen, M., & Hoogerwerf, E. J. (2017). Opportunities and challenges related to ICT and ICT-AT use by people with disabilities: An explorative study into factors that impact the digital divide. Technology and Disability, 29(1–2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-170174
  20. Mawena, J., & Sorkpor, R. S. (2024). Enhancing inclusive physical activity for students with disabilities: Patterns and opportunities. Aquademia, 8(1), Article ep24002. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/14430
  21. Newman, L., Browne-Yung, K., Raghavendra, P., Wood, D., & Grace, E. (2016). Applying a critical approach to investigate barriers to digital inclusion and online social networking among young people with disabilities. Information Systems Journal, 27(5), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12106
  22. Nouraldeen, R. M. (2023). The impact of technology readiness and use perceptions on students’ adoption of artificial intelligence: The moderating role of gender. Development and Learning in Organizations, 37(3), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-07-2022-0133
  23. Pérez-Escolar, M., & Canet, F. (2023). Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: Toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(4), 1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x
  24. Peruzzo, F., & Allan, J. (2024). Rethinking inclusive (digital) education: Lessons from the pandemic to reconceptualize inclusion through convivial technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2131817
  25. Sudaryanto, M. R., Aditya, H. M., & Tommy, A. (2023). The effect of technology readiness, digital competence, perceived usefulness, and ease of use on accounting students artificial intelligence adoption. E3S Web of Conferences, 388, Article 04055. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804055
  26. Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-005
  27. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
  28. Tsatsou, P. (2019). Digital inclusion of people with disabilities: A qualitative study of intra-disability diversity in the digital realm. Behavior and Information Technology, 39(9), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1636136
  29. Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046
  30. van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
  31. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  32. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  33. Welesilassie, M. W., & Gerencheal, B. (2024). “Only Amharic or leave quick!”: Linguistic genocide in the Western Tigray Region of Ethiopia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38, 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10113-7
  34. Welesilassie, M. W., & Gerencheal, B. (2025). Digital language instruction in Ethiopian high schools: Digital literacy, utilization, and challenges. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 6(1), Article e02501. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/15722
  35. Welesilassie, M. W., & Nikolov, M. (2024a). L2 anxiety, proficiency, and communication across the classroom, non-classroom, and digital settings: Insights from Ethiopian preparatory schools. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241288792
  36. Welesilassie, M. W., & Nikolov, M. (2024b). The relationship among EFL learners’ motivational self-system, willingness to communicate, and self-assessed proficiency at an Ethiopian preparatory high school. Heliyon, 10(2), Article e24171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24171
  37. Yeshanew, Y. T., Xu, T., & Yuan, W. (2023). Perceptions on their own social participation: A qualitative exploration of Ethiopian secondary students with visual impairments. Healthcare, 11(4), Article 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040605
  38. Zhang, J., Wang, X., & Li, Z. (2024). Enhancing trust in AI technologies through user engagement: A cross-cultural study. Technology in Society, 76, Article 101927.
  39. Zhang, P., Sun, H., & Chen, H. (2019). Understanding individual user resistance and switching behaviors to new IT technologies. Communications of the ACM, 62(3), 54–61.