Research Article

ARGeo Math: An alternative media to improve students’ mathematical creative thinking skills on geometry topics

Yulia Maftuhah Hidayati 1 * , Muhammad Noor Kholid 1 , Anton Adi Suryo Kusuma 1 , Achmad Januar Arifin 1 , Anatri Desstya 1 , Fitri Puji Rahmawati 1
More Detail
1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), April 2026, ep648, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18320
Published: 06 April 2026
OPEN ACCESS   299 Views   260 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Mathematical creativity is a crucial component of 21st century education, yet limited research has examined how augmented reality (AR) can systematically enhance this ability in elementary mathematics. Grounded in the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) and constructivist perspectives, this study investigates the effectiveness of ARGeo Math, an AR-based learning application that transforms abstract geometry concepts into interactive 3D visualizations to foster creative mathematical thinking. A quasi-experimental design involving 49 fifth-grade students in Indonesia was conducted, with one class serving as the control group and another as the experimental group using ARGeo Math. Quantitative analyses using normalized gain (N-gain) and t-tests revealed a significant improvement in students’ creative thinking skills in the experimental group (N-gain = 76.84%, effective category). Beyond statistical gains, ARGeo Math supported cognitive engagement, flexible problem-solving, and deeper understanding by linking visual and symbolic representations. The findings extend educational technology theory by demonstrating a clear mechanism through which CTML principles particularly integrated multimodal cues can be operationalized to stimulate generative mathematical reasoning. This study offers practical, scalable insights for designing AR-enhanced STEM learning in primary education, and its theoretical model provides a distinct contribution for guiding future creativity-oriented AR instructional design. Nonetheless, the quasi-experimental design with limited sample size and short intervention duration constrains the generalizability of results, indicating the need for longitudinal and multi-site research to further validate the model.
Keywords: augmented reality, elementary education, elementary students, geometry, mathematics education

CITATION (APA)

Hidayati, Y. M., Kholid, M. N., Kusuma, A. A. S., Arifin, A. J., Desstya, A., & Rahmawati, F. P. (2026). ARGeo Math: An alternative media to improve students’ mathematical creative thinking skills on geometry topics. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), ep648. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18320

REFERENCES

  1. AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Zaki Aboud, Y., & Alhayek, K. A. (2025). The effectiveness of using augmented reality technology in science education to enhance creative thinking skills among gifted eighth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), Article em2644. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16416
  2. Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), Article 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
  3. American Educational Research Association. (2019). Code of ethics. AERA. https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/AERA-Rules-Policies/Code-of-Ethics
  4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  5. Bendig, A. W. (1954). Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(1), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055647
  6. Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093
  7. Bödding, R., Bentler, D., & Maier, G. W. (2023). Augmented reality for constructivist learning at work: Current perspectives and future applications. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 54(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-023-00699-0
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  9. Buchner, J. (2022). Generative learning strategies do not diminish primary students’ attitudes towards augmented reality. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10445-y
  10. Cardoso, J. C. S., Perrotta, A., Silva, P. A., & Martins, P. (2023). Advances in tangible and embodied interaction for virtual and augmented reality. Electronics, 12(8), Article 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081893
  11. Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
  12. Cellupica, A., Cirelli, M., Giannini, O., & Valentini, P. P. (2024). Interactive modelling in augmented reality with subdivision surfaces and advanced user gesture recognition. Applied Sciences, 14(24), Article 11873. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411873
  13. Chang, H.-Y., Binali, T., Liang, J.-C., Chiou, G.-L., Cheng, K.-H., Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-) experimental studies to investigate the impact. Computers & Education, 191, Article 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  15. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  16. Czerkawski, B., & Berti, M. (2021). Learning experience design for augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2429
  17. de Morais Bicalho, R. N., Coll, C., Engel, A., & de Oliveira, M. C. S. L. (2023). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: Propositions to the SAMR model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x
  18. Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022). Exploring the effect of augmented reality on cognitive load, attitude, spatial ability, and stereochemical perception. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09957-0
  19. Garzón, J. (2021). An overview of twenty-five years of augmented reality in education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(7), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5070037
  20. Gulyaeva, T. I., Kolomeychenko, A. S., Polshakova, N. V., Shumetov, V. G., & Yakovlev, A. S. (2019). Experience of quantitative analysis of students’ questionnaires on education quality problems: Methodology, models and perspectives. Integration of Education, 23(2), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.095.023.201902.284-302
  21. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
  22. Harris, D. (2023). Spatial reasoning in context: Bridging cognitive and educational perspectives of spatial-mathematics relations. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1302099
  23. Hidajat, F. A. (2024). Augmented reality applications for mathematical creativity: A systematic review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 991-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00287-7
  24. Hidayat, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9257-9282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x
  25. İslim, Ö. F., Namlı, Ş., Sevim, N., Özçakır, B., & Lavicza, Z. (2024). Augmented reality in mathematics education: A systematic review. Participatory Educational Research, 11(4), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.52.11.4
  26. Koparan, T., Dinar, H., Koparan, E. T., & Haldan, Z. S. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into mathematics teaching and learning and examining its effectiveness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101245
  27. Krüger, J. M., & Bodemer, D. (2022). Application and investigation of multimedia design principles in augmented reality learning environments. Information, 13(2), Article 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020074
  28. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  29. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), Article 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  30. Leong, Y. H., Ho, W. K., & Cheng, L. P. (2015). Concrete-pictorial-abstract: Surveying its origins and charting its future. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 1-18.
  31. Li, F., Wang, X., He, X., Cheng, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). How augmented reality affected academic achievement in K-12 education a meta-analysis and thematic-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5582-5600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012810
  32. Mayer, R. E. (2001). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (pp. 41-62). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603.004
  33. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007
  34. Mayer, R. E. (2022). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 57-72). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008
  35. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  36. Moser, S., & Lewalter, D. (2024). The impact of instructional support via generative learning strategies on the perception of visual authenticity, learning outcomes, and satisfaction in AR-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(4), 3437-3462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00813-w
  37. Newton, D., Wang, Y. (Linda), & Newton, L. (2022). ‘Allowing them to dream’: Fostering creativity in mathematics undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(10), 1334-1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2075719
  38. Nikolarakis, A., & Koutsabasis, P. (2024). Mobile AR interaction design patterns for storytelling in cultural heritage: A systematic review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(6), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8060052
  39. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press. https://archive.org/details/scienceofeducati00piag
  40. PISA. (2024). PISA 2022 results (volume III). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
  41. Prasetiyo, W. H., Sari, B. I., Naidu, N. B. M., Sa’diyah, H., Saputri, R. N., Dewantara, J. A., & Patmisari. (2022). Dataset of TPACK in teaching practice: Adversity quotient, attitude computer technology and self-efficacy among Indonesian teachers. Data in Brief, 45, Article 108749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108749
  42. Pujiastuti, H., & Haryadi, R. (2024). The effectiveness of using augmented reality on the geometry thinking ability of junior high school students. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 1738-1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.180
  43. Rebollo, C., Remolar, I., Rossano, V., & Lanzilotti, R. (2022). Multimedia augmented reality game for learning math. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(11), 14851-14868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10821-3
  44. Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (the comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
  45. Richardo, R., Wijaya, A., Rochmadi, T., Abdullah, A. A., Nurkhamid, Astuti, A. W., & Hidayah, K. N. (2023). Ethnomathematics augmented reality: Android-based learning multimedia to improve creative thinking skills on geometry. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(4), 731-737. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.4.1860
  46. Ropawandi, D., Halim, L., & Husnin, H. (2022). Augmented reality (AR) technology-based learning: The effect on physics learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1596
  47. Schutera, S., Schnierle, M., Wu, M., Pertzel, T., Seybold, J., Bauer, P., Teutscher, D., Raedle, M., Heß-Mohr, N., Röck, S., & Krause, M. J. (2021). On the potential of augmented reality for mathematics teaching with the application cleARmaths. Education Sciences, 11(8), Article 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080368
  48. Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
  49. Sulistyanto, H., Anif, S., Sutama, Narimo, S., Sutopo, A., Haq, M. I., & Nasir, G. A. (2022). Education application testing perspective to empower students’ higher order thinking skills related to the concept of adaptive learning media. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 4(3), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i3.19432
  50. Sulistyanto, H., Prayitno, H. J., Narimo, S., Anif, S., Sumardjoko, B., & Wardhani, N. W. (2024). A study of the use of augmented reality in learning: Impacts on increasing students’ critical thinking skills. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(2), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i2.27093
  51. Surya, K. A., Sayekti, I. C., & Ali, S. R. B. (2022). Analysis of the implementation of 21st-century skills based on 2013 curriculum in primary level. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v9i1.16293
  52. Thom, J. S., McGarvey, L. M., & Markle, J. (2024). Projective geometry and spatial reasoning for STEM learning. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1312845
  53. Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
  54. UNESCO. (2024). Transforming education towards SDG 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000390204
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  56. Walkington, C., Nathan, M. J., Hunnicutt, J., Washington, J., & Zhou, M. (2024). New kinds of embodied interactions that arise in augmented reality dynamic geometry software. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 75, Article 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101175
  57. Walkington, C., Nathan, M. J., Washington, J., Hunnicutt, J., Darwin, T., Daughrity, L., & Schenck, K. (2025). Comparing learning geometry using a tablet to head-mounted display augmented reality: How and when dimensionality matters. Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 5397-5426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13008-z
  58. Wen, Y., Wu, L., He, S., Ng, N. H.-E., Teo, B. C., Looi, C. K., & Cai, Y. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into inquiry-based learning approach in primary science classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1631-1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10235-y
  59. Wu, J., Jiang, H., Long, L., & Zhang, X. (2024). Effects of AR mathematical picture books on primary school students’ geometric thinking, cognitive load and flow experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24627-24652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12768-y
  60. Yang, Y., Du, W., Mavrikis, M., & Geraniou, E. (2025). Spatial skill development through augmented reality in mathematics education: A scoping review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00187-8